Suppr超能文献

各种临床因素对陶瓷/玻璃聚合物基CAD-CAM材料最终颜色的影响。

Impact of various clinical factors on the final color of ceramic/glass-polymer based CAD-CAM materials.

作者信息

Yilmaz Sebnem, Egilmez Ferhan

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.

Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey,

出版信息

Am J Dent. 2023 Feb;36(1):8-14.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of material type, material thickness and cement shade on the final color of two different ceramic/glass-polymer-based CAD-CAM blocks over colored abutments.

METHODS

Tested blocks (Vita Enamic-VE and Cerasmart-Cs) were cut in three different thicknesses (1, 1.5 and 2 mm), and cemented on two different shaded (B1 and C3) resin discs with three shades (A2-Universal, W-White, T-Translucent) of a self-adhesive resin cement. An additional 10 specimens were prepared for control (n= 370). 36 subgroups were formed to simulate different clinical conditions (n= 10). The final color difference (ΔE₀₀) was recorded as the difference between material-cement-resin composite assembly and control specimens on a black background according to the CIEΔE 2000 color difference formula. Clinical perceptibility (0.80) and acceptability thresholds (1.80) were used to evaluate the results. Data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis and the Mann-Whitney U non-parametric tests at P< 0.05 significance level.

RESULTS

ΔE₀₀ results were influenced by the polymer-based CAD-CAM material type, material thickness, and cement shade (P< 0.05) over both abutment shades. VE exhibited lower ΔE₀₀ values than Cs over B1 and C3 shaded abutments (for each abutment P< 0.001). Specimens of 1 mm thickness exhibited significantly higher ΔE₀₀ than the 2 mm or 1.5 mm specimens (P< 0.001), and W cement shade demonstrated higher ΔE₀₀ than T or A2 shades (P< 0.001) over both shaded abutments.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

The final color of the polymer-based CAD-CAM restoration can be improved by the suitable combination of material/material thickness/cement shade to achieve the desired esthetic outcomes within clinically acceptable limits. Regardless of the type of polymer-based CAD-CAM material chosen, at least 1.5 mm restoration thickness with the use of Translucent or A2 cement shade is recommended for masking whitened or darkened shaded abutment teeth in clinical practice.

摘要

目的

评估材料类型、材料厚度和粘结剂色度对两种不同陶瓷/玻璃聚合物基CAD-CAM块在有色基台上最终颜色的影响。

方法

将测试块(维他易美-VE和赛拉玛特-Cs)切割成三种不同厚度(1、1.5和2毫米),并用三种色度(A2通用型、W白色、T半透明型)的自粘结树脂粘结剂粘结在两种不同色度(B1和C3)的树脂圆盘上。另外制备10个样本作为对照(n = 370)。形成36个亚组以模拟不同临床情况(n = 10)。根据CIEΔE 2000色差公式,将最终色差(ΔE₀₀)记录为材料-粘结剂-树脂复合材料组件与黑色背景下对照样本之间的差异。使用临床可察觉性阈值(0.80)和可接受性阈值(1.80)来评估结果。在P<0.05显著性水平下,使用Kruskal-Wallis和Mann-Whitney U非参数检验对数据进行分析。

结果

在两种基台色度上,ΔE₀₀结果受聚合物基CAD-CAM材料类型、材料厚度和粘结剂色度影响(P<0.05)。在B1和C3色度的基台上,VE的ΔE₀₀值低于Cs(每种基台P<0.001)。1毫米厚的样本的ΔE₀₀显著高于2毫米或1.5毫米厚的样本(P<0.001),在两种色度的基台上,W粘结剂色度的ΔE₀₀高于T或A2色度(P<0.001)。

临床意义

通过材料/材料厚度/粘结剂色度的合适组合,可以改善聚合物基CAD-CAM修复体的最终颜色,以便在临床可接受的范围内实现预期的美学效果。在临床实践中,无论选择何种聚合物基CAD-CAM材料类型,对于掩盖变色的基台牙,建议使用半透明型或A2粘结剂色度且修复体厚度至少为1.5毫米。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验