Suppr超能文献

《恐动症量表(Tampa 量表):肌肉骨骼疼痛人群中的心理测量特性系统评价》。

The Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia: A Systematic Review of Its Psychometric Properties in People With Musculoskeletal Pain.

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada.

Centre interdisciplinaire de recherche en réadaptation et intégration sociale (Cirris), Quebec City, Canada.

出版信息

Clin J Pain. 2023 May 1;39(5):236-247. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001104.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aims of this systematic review were to identify the different versions of the Tampa Scale of kinesiophobia (TSK) and to report on the psychometric evidence relating to these different versions for people experiencing musculoskeletal pain.

METHODS

Medline [Ovid] CINAHL and Embase databases were searched for publications reporting on the psychometric properties of the TSK in populations with musculoskeletal pain. Risks of bias were evaluated using the COSMIN risk of the bias assessment tool.

RESULTS

Forty-one studies were included, mainly with a low risk of bias. Five versions of the TSK were identified: TSK-17, TSK-13, TSK-11, TSK-4, and TSK-TMD (for temporomandibular disorders). Most TSK versions showed good to excellent test-retest reliability (intraclass coefficient correlation 0.77 to 0.99) and good internal consistency (ɑ=0.68 to 0.91), except for the TSK-4 as its reliability has yet to be defined. The minimal detectable change was lower for the TSK-17 (11% to 13% of total score) and the TSK-13 (8% of total score) compared with the TSK-11 (16% of total score). Most TSK versions showed good construct validity, although TSK-11 validity was inconsistent between studies. Finally, the TSK-17, -13, and -11 were highly responsive to change, while responsiveness has yet to be defined for the TSK-4 and TSK-TMD.

DISCUSSION

Clinical guidelines now recommend that clinicians identify the presence of kinesiophobia among patients as it may contribute to persistent pain and disability. The TSK is a self-report questionnaire widely used, but 5 different versions exist. Based on these results, the use of TSK-13 and TSK-17 is encouraged as they are valid, reliable, and responsive.

摘要

目的

本系统评价的目的是确定运动恐惧量表(TSK)的不同版本,并报告与患有肌肉骨骼疼痛人群相关的这些不同版本的心理测量证据。

方法

在 Medline [Ovid]、CINAHL 和 Embase 数据库中检索报告肌肉骨骼疼痛人群中 TSK 心理测量特性的出版物。使用 COSMIN 偏倚风险评估工具评估偏倚风险。

结果

共纳入 41 项研究,主要偏倚风险较低。确定了 TSK 的 5 个版本:TSK-17、TSK-13、TSK-11、TSK-4 和 TSK-TMD(用于颞下颌关节紊乱)。除 TSK-4 外,大多数 TSK 版本的测试-重测信度均较好(组内相关系数 0.77 至 0.99),内部一致性较好(α=0.68 至 0.91),其可靠性尚未确定。与 TSK-11(总评分的 16%)相比,TSK-17(总评分的 11%至 13%)和 TSK-13(总评分的 8%)的最小可检测变化较低。虽然 TSK-11 的有效性在研究之间不一致,但大多数 TSK 版本显示出良好的结构有效性。最后,TSK-17、-13 和 -11 对变化高度敏感,而 TSK-4 和 TSK-TMD 的反应性尚未确定。

讨论

临床指南现在建议临床医生识别患者是否存在运动恐惧症,因为它可能导致持续疼痛和残疾。TSK 是一种广泛使用的自我报告问卷,但存在 5 种不同的版本。基于这些结果,鼓励使用 TSK-13 和 TSK-17,因为它们是有效、可靠和敏感的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验