Department of Psychology, Truman State University, Kirksville, Missouri, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Psychother Psychosom. 2023;92(2):133-138. doi: 10.1159/000529784. Epub 2023 Mar 14.
In research and treatment of mood disorders, "euthymia" traditionally denotes the absence of clinically significant mood disturbance. A newer, expanded definition of euthymia also includes positive affect and psychological well-being.
We aimed to test this comprehensive model of euthymia and estimate the coherence and predictive power of each factor in the model.
Community-dwelling adults (N = 601), including both mental health outpatients and non-patients at high risk for personality pathology, completed a battery of interviews and questionnaires at time 1. Most (n = 497) were reassessed on average 8 months later (time 2). We modeled euthymia using standard mood, personality, and psychosocial functioning assessments rather than measures designed specifically for euthymia.
The hypothesized model of euthymia was supported by confirmatory factor analysis: specific measures loaded on three lower order factors (mood disturbance, positive affect, and psychological well-being) that reflected general euthymia at time 1. Each factor (general euthymia plus lower order factors) demonstrated moderately strong concurrent (time 1) and predictive (time 1-2) correlations with outcomes, including employment status, income, mental health treatment consumption, and disability. Compared to positive affect and psychological well-being, mood disturbance had stronger incremental (i.e., nonoverlapping) relations with these outcomes.
Support for a comprehensive model of euthymia reinforces efforts to improve assessment and treatment of mood and other disorders. Beyond dampening of psychological distress, euthymia-informed treatment goals encompass full recovery, including enjoyment and meaning in life.
在心境障碍的研究和治疗中,“稳定状态”传统上表示没有临床显著的情绪障碍。对稳定状态的一个新的、扩展的定义还包括积极的情绪和心理健康。
我们旨在测试这种全面的稳定状态模型,并估计模型中每个因素的一致性和预测能力。
包括心理健康门诊患者和有患人格障碍风险的非患者在内的社区居民成年人(N=601)在第 1 次就诊时完成了一系列访谈和问卷调查。大多数(n=497)在平均 8 个月后(第 2 次就诊)进行了重新评估。我们使用标准的情绪、人格和心理社会功能评估来构建稳定状态模型,而不是使用专门为稳定状态设计的测量方法。
通过验证性因素分析,稳定状态的假设模型得到了支持:特定的测量指标加载到三个较低阶的因素(情绪障碍、积极情绪和心理健康)上,反映了第 1 次就诊时的一般稳定状态。每个因素(一般稳定状态加上较低阶因素)都表现出与结局(包括就业状况、收入、心理健康治疗消费和残疾)具有中等强度的同时(第 1 次就诊)和预测(第 1 次就诊-第 2 次就诊)相关性。与积极情绪和心理健康相比,情绪障碍与这些结局的关系更为密切(即,非重叠)。
对全面的稳定状态模型的支持加强了改善情绪和其他障碍的评估和治疗的努力。除了减轻心理困扰之外,稳定状态指导的治疗目标还包括全面康复,包括享受生活和生活的意义。