Suppr超能文献

《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版人格功能水平:将人格障碍重新聚焦于人性的内涵

DSM-5 Level of Personality Functioning: Refocusing Personality Disorder on What It Means to Be Human.

作者信息

Sharp Carla, Wall Kiana

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Houston, Houston, Texas 77204, USA; email:

出版信息

Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2021 May 7;17:313-337. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-081219-105402. Epub 2020 Dec 11.

Abstract

Level of Personality Functioning (LPF) represents the entry criterion (Criterion A) of the Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD) in the fifth edition of the (DSM-5). It is defined as a dimensional general severity criterion common to all personality disorders and conceptually independent of personality types or traits, and it represents maladaptive self (identity and self-direction) and interpersonal (empathy and intimacy) functioning. We review the history, measurement, and significance of LPF. We show that the inclusion of LPF in the AMPD is well justified if it is defined as a general adaptive failure of a subjective intrapsychic system needed to fulfill adult life tasks. If so defined, LPF distinguishes itself from maladaptive traits (Criterion B of the AMPD) and captures the contribution humans make as agentic authors to the interpretation and management of the self. While Criterion B maladaptive traits provide important descriptive nuance to manifestations of personality pathology, maladaptive LPF is conditional to the diagnosis of personality disorder.

摘要

人格功能水平(LPF)是《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM-5)中人格障碍替代模型(AMPD)的准入标准(标准A)。它被定义为所有人格障碍共有的维度性一般严重程度标准,在概念上独立于人格类型或特质,代表适应不良的自我(身份认同和自我导向)和人际(共情和亲密关系)功能。我们回顾了LPF的历史、测量方法及其重要性。我们表明,如果将LPF定义为完成成人生活任务所需的主观心理系统的一般适应性失败,那么在AMPD中纳入LPF是有充分理由的。如果这样定义,LPF就与适应不良特质(AMPD的标准B)区分开来,并捕捉到人类作为能动主体对自我解释和管理所做的贡献。虽然标准B中的适应不良特质为人格病理学表现提供了重要的描述性细微差别,但适应不良的LPF是人格障碍诊断的条件。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验