• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助手术与开放性手术在小肾肿瘤部分肾切除术治疗中的成本效益比较。

Cost-effectiveness of robotic-assisted surgery vs open surgery in the context of partial nephrectomy for small kidney tumors.

机构信息

Urology Department, Nancy University Hospital, Site de Brabois, rue du Morvan, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.

Centre for Clinical Epidemiology CIC 1433 Inserm, Nancy University Hospital, Site de Brabois, Nancy, France.

出版信息

J Robot Surg. 2023 Aug;17(4):1571-1578. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01552-8. Epub 2023 Mar 15.

DOI:10.1007/s11701-023-01552-8
PMID:36918464
Abstract

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of robotic-assisted surgery compared to open surgery in the context of partial nephrectomy for small kidney tumor management. This is a retrospective study using data from 395 patients operated on by either robot-assisted surgery (RAPN) or by open partial nephrectomy (OPN); one hospital performed RAPN exclusively and the second hospital, OPN exclusively. Cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted from the perspective of the National Health Insurance System (NHIS) by considering the costs of the initial hospital stay and the cost of complications. Clinical outcome was defined by the avoidance of major complications during the 12 months postoperatively. Major complications were absent in 82% of patients in the OPN group and 93% of patients in the RAPN group, with 11% in favor of robotic assistance (p < 0.001). The average cost per patient, including the costs of complications, were, respectively, 9637 € and 8305 € for the OPN and RAPN groups. Robotic assistance was associated with a 1332 € lower cost (p < 0.001). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) is estimated at - 12,039 €. From the perspective of the public payer, robotic assistance was associated with a lower rate of postoperative complications and a lower average cost per patient. Robotic-assisted surgery was an efficient alternative to open surgery in partial nephrectomy. Trial registration number: NCT05089006 (October 22, 2021).

摘要

评估机器人辅助手术与开放手术在小肾肿瘤管理的部分肾切除术方面的成本效益。这是一项回顾性研究,使用了 395 名接受机器人辅助手术(RAPN)或开放部分肾切除术(OPN)治疗的患者的数据;一家医院专门进行 RAPN,另一家医院专门进行 OPN。成本效益分析从国家健康保险系统(NHIS)的角度进行,考虑了初始住院费用和并发症费用。临床结果定义为避免术后 12 个月内发生重大并发症。OPN 组 82%的患者和 RAPN 组 93%的患者无重大并发症,机器人辅助组有 11%的患者受益(p<0.001)。包括并发症费用在内,OPN 和 RAPN 组的每位患者平均费用分别为 9637 欧元和 8305 欧元。机器人辅助治疗的成本降低了 1332 欧元(p<0.001)。增量成本效益比(ICER)估计为-12039 欧元。从公共支付者的角度来看,机器人辅助治疗与术后并发症发生率降低和每位患者平均成本降低有关。机器人辅助手术是部分肾切除术的一种有效替代开放手术的方法。试验注册号:NCT05089006(2021 年 10 月 22 日)。

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of robotic-assisted surgery vs open surgery in the context of partial nephrectomy for small kidney tumors.机器人辅助手术与开放性手术在小肾肿瘤部分肾切除术治疗中的成本效益比较。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Aug;17(4):1571-1578. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01552-8. Epub 2023 Mar 15.
2
Nurse-led coordinated surgical care pathways for cost optimization of robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy: medico-economic analysis of the UroCCR-25 AMBU-REIN study.以护士为主导的机器人辅助部分肾切除术成本优化的协调手术护理路径:UroCCR-25 AMBU-REIN研究的药物经济学分析
World J Urol. 2023 Feb;41(2):325-333. doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-04066-4. Epub 2022 Jun 21.
3
Short-term Outcomes and Costs Following Partial Nephrectomy in England: A Population-based Study.英国部分肾切除术的短期预后和成本:一项基于人群的研究。
Eur Urol Focus. 2018 Jul;4(4):579-585. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.03.010. Epub 2017 Apr 8.
4
Comparing open and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy - a single institution report.比较开放性和机器人辅助部分肾切除术-单机构报告。
BMC Urol. 2024 Sep 9;24(1):197. doi: 10.1186/s12894-024-01586-6.
5
Open Partial Nephrectomy vs. Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy for a Renal Tumor Larger than 4 cm: a Propensity Score Matching Analysis.开放部分肾切除术与机器人辅助部分肾切除术治疗大于 4cm 的肾肿瘤:倾向评分匹配分析。
J Korean Med Sci. 2021 May 24;36(20):e135. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e135.
6
Cost-effectiveness analysis of robot-assisted vs. open partial nephrectomy.机器人辅助与开放性部分肾切除术的成本效益分析。
Int J Med Robot. 2018 Aug;14(4):e1920. doi: 10.1002/rcs.1920. Epub 2018 May 28.
7
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies Reporting Perioperative Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy Versus Open Partial Nephrectomy.机器人辅助部分肾切除术与开放性部分肾切除术围手术期结果比较研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Endourol. 2017 Sep;31(9):893-909. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0351. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
8
Robotic-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy for Kidney Cancer: A Health Technology Assessment.机器人辅助肾癌部分肾切除术:一项卫生技术评估
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2023 Oct 10;23(7):1-77. eCollection 2023.
9
Evolution of Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy: Techniques and Outcomes from the Transatlantic Robotic Nephron-sparing Surgery Study Group.机器人辅助部分肾切除术的演变:来自跨大西洋机器人肾部分切除术研究组的技术和结果。
Eur Urol. 2019 Aug;76(2):222-227. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.11.038. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
10
A propensity score-matched comparison of surgical precision obtained by using volumetric analysis between robot-assisted laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy for T1 renal cell carcinoma: a retrospective non-randomized observational study of initial outcomes.一项倾向评分匹配比较:机器人辅助腹腔镜与开放性部分肾切除术治疗T1期肾细胞癌时通过容积分析获得的手术精度——一项关于初始结局的回顾性非随机观察性研究
Int Urol Nephrol. 2016 Oct;48(10):1585-91. doi: 10.1007/s11255-016-1323-y. Epub 2016 Jun 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Intraindividual Perception of Open versus Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy (PERCEPTION Trial): An Important Complementing Perspective to Randomized Controlled Trials.个体对开放性与机器人辅助部分肾切除术的感知(PERCEPTION试验):对随机对照试验的一个重要补充视角。
Urol Int. 2025 Apr 6:1-10. doi: 10.1159/000545583.
2
Robot-Assisted Urachal Excision and Partial Cystectomy for Urachal Pathologies: Systematic Review with Insights from Single-Center Experience.机器人辅助脐尿管切除及部分膀胱切除术治疗脐尿管疾病:基于单中心经验的系统评价
J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 14;14(4):1273. doi: 10.3390/jcm14041273.
3
Economic Evaluations of Robotic-Assisted Surgery: Methods, Challenges and Opportunities.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical and oncological outcomes of open partial nephrectomy versus robot assisted partial nephrectomy over 15 years.开放部分肾切除术与机器人辅助部分肾切除术15年的临床及肿瘤学结局
J Robot Surg. 2023 Apr;17(2):519-526. doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01446-1. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
2
Open versus robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: A longitudinal comparison of 880 patients over 10 years.开放与机器人辅助部分肾切除术:10 年 880 例患者的纵向比较。
Int J Med Robot. 2021 Feb;17(1):1-8. doi: 10.1002/rcs.2167. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
3
Is Robot-assisted Surgery Contraindicated in the Case of Partial Nephrectomy for Complex Tumours or Relevant Comorbidities? A Comparative Analysis of Morbidity, Renal Function, and Oncologic Outcomes.
机器人辅助手术的经济评估:方法、挑战与机遇
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2025 Jan;23(1):35-49. doi: 10.1007/s40258-024-00920-1. Epub 2024 Sep 27.
4
A systematic review of full economic evaluations of robotic-assisted surgery in thoracic and abdominopelvic procedures.机器人辅助手术在胸腹部手术中的全经济评估的系统评价。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Dec;17(6):2671-2685. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01731-7. Epub 2023 Oct 16.
5
New multiport robotic surgical systems: a comprehensive literature review of clinical outcomes in urology.新型多端口机器人手术系统:泌尿外科临床结果的全面文献综述
Ther Adv Urol. 2023 Jun 5;15:17562872231177781. doi: 10.1177/17562872231177781. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
6
Last Resort from Nursing Shortage? Comparative Cost Analysis of Open vs. Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomies with a Focus on the Costs of Nursing Care.护理短缺的最后手段?开放性与机器人辅助部分肾切除术的成本比较分析,重点关注护理成本。
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Apr 14;15(8):2291. doi: 10.3390/cancers15082291.
机器人辅助手术是否不适合用于复杂肿瘤或相关合并症的部分肾切除术?对发病率、肾功能和肿瘤学结果的比较分析。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2018 May;1(1):61-68. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.01.001. Epub 2018 May 15.
4
Cost-effectiveness analysis of robot-assisted vs. open partial nephrectomy.机器人辅助与开放性部分肾切除术的成本效益分析。
Int J Med Robot. 2018 Aug;14(4):e1920. doi: 10.1002/rcs.1920. Epub 2018 May 28.
5
Functional and oncological outcomes of open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a multicentre comparative matched-pair analyses with a median of 5 years' follow-up.开放、腹腔镜和机器人辅助部分肾切除术的功能和肿瘤学结果:一项多中心配对比较分析,中位随访时间为 5 年。
BJU Int. 2018 Oct;122(4):618-626. doi: 10.1111/bju.14250. Epub 2018 May 24.
6
Impact of hospital volume and surgeon volume on robot-assisted partial nephrectomy outcomes: a multicentre study.医院和外科医生手术量对机器人辅助部分肾切除术结果的影响:一项多中心研究。
BJU Int. 2018 Jun;121(6):916-922. doi: 10.1111/bju.14175. Epub 2018 Mar 25.
7
Long-term oncological outcomes after robotic partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: a prospective multicentre study.机器人辅助部分肾切除术治疗肾细胞癌的长期肿瘤学结果:一项前瞻性多中心研究。
World J Urol. 2018 Jun;36(6):897-904. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2208-8. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
8
Short-term Outcomes and Costs Following Partial Nephrectomy in England: A Population-based Study.英国部分肾切除术的短期预后和成本:一项基于人群的研究。
Eur Urol Focus. 2018 Jul;4(4):579-585. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.03.010. Epub 2017 Apr 8.
9
Perioperative and long-term renal functional outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a multicenter matched-pair comparison.机器人辅助与腹腔镜下肾部分切除术的围手术期及长期肾功能结局:一项多中心配对比较研究
World J Urol. 2015 Oct;33(10):1579-84. doi: 10.1007/s00345-015-1488-5. Epub 2015 Jan 14.
10
The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience.手术并发症的Clavien-Dindo分类:五年经验
Ann Surg. 2009 Aug;250(2):187-96. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2.