• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助手术在胸腹部手术中的全经济评估的系统评价。

A systematic review of full economic evaluations of robotic-assisted surgery in thoracic and abdominopelvic procedures.

机构信息

Department of Health Economic and Outcomes Research, Medtronic ULC, 99 Hereford St., Brampton, ON, L6Y 0R3, Canada.

Champlain Regional Cancer Program Depts OB/GYN, Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, 501 Smyth Rd, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada.

出版信息

J Robot Surg. 2023 Dec;17(6):2671-2685. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01731-7. Epub 2023 Oct 16.

DOI:10.1007/s11701-023-01731-7
PMID:37843673
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10678817/
Abstract

This study aims to conduct a systematic review of full economic analyses of robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) in adults' thoracic and abdominopelvic indications. Authors used Medline, EMBASE, and PubMed to conduct a systematic review following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. Fully published economic articles in English were included. Methodology and reporting quality were assessed using standardized tools. Majority of studies (28/33) were on oncology procedures. Radical prostatectomy was the most reported procedure (16/33). Twenty-eight studies used quality-adjusted life years, and five used complication rates as outcomes. Nine used primary and 24 studies used secondary data. All studies used modeling. In 81% of studies (27/33), RAS was cost-effective or potentially cost-effective compared to comparator procedures, including radical prostatectomy, nephrectomy, and cystectomy. Societal perspective, longer-term time-horizon, and larger volumes favored RAS. Cost-drivers were length of stay and equipment cost. From societal and payer perspectives, robotic-assisted surgery is a cost-effective strategy for thoracic and abdominopelvic procedures.Clinical trial registration This study is a systematic review with no intervention, not a clinical trial.

摘要

本研究旨在对成人胸腹部适应证的机器人辅助手术(RAS)的全经济分析进行系统评价。作者使用 Medline、EMBASE 和 PubMed 按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)2020 指南进行了系统评价。纳入了全英文发表的经济文章。使用标准化工具评估方法学和报告质量。大多数研究(33 项中的 28 项)为肿瘤学手术。根治性前列腺切除术是报告最多的手术(33 项中的 16 项)。28 项研究使用了质量调整生命年,5 项研究使用了并发症发生率作为结果。9 项研究使用了初级数据,24 项研究使用了次级数据。所有研究均使用建模。在 81%的研究(33 项中的 27 项)中,与比较手术(包括根治性前列腺切除术、肾切除术和膀胱切除术)相比,RAS 具有成本效益或潜在成本效益。从社会角度看,更长的时间范围和更大的手术量有利于 RAS。成本驱动因素是住院时间和设备成本。从社会和支付者的角度来看,机器人辅助手术是胸腹部手术的一种具有成本效益的策略。临床试验注册 本研究是一项系统评价,没有干预措施,不属于临床试验。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af3c/10678817/d34f782147c6/11701_2023_1731_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af3c/10678817/d34f782147c6/11701_2023_1731_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af3c/10678817/d34f782147c6/11701_2023_1731_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A systematic review of full economic evaluations of robotic-assisted surgery in thoracic and abdominopelvic procedures.机器人辅助手术在胸腹部手术中的全经济评估的系统评价。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Dec;17(6):2671-2685. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01731-7. Epub 2023 Oct 16.
2
Systematic review and economic modelling of the relative clinical benefit and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery and robotic surgery for removal of the prostate in men with localised prostate cancer.系统评价和经济建模研究腹腔镜手术和机器人手术治疗局限性前列腺癌患者前列腺的相对临床获益和成本效益。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(41):1-313. doi: 10.3310/hta16410.
3
Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy for the treatment of localised prostate cancer.腹腔镜及机器人辅助与开放根治性前列腺切除术治疗局限性前列腺癌的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 12;9(9):CD009625. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009625.pub2.
4
Economic evaluation of treatments for patients with localized prostate cancer in Europe: a systematic review.欧洲局限性前列腺癌患者治疗的经济学评估:一项系统评价
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Oct 3;16(1):541. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1781-z.
5
Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠癌的临床疗效与成本效益:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Nov;10(45):1-141, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10450.
6
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
7
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
8
Adefovir dipivoxil and pegylated interferon alfa-2a for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B: a systematic review and economic evaluation.阿德福韦酯与聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2a治疗慢性乙型肝炎:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Aug;10(28):iii-iv, xi-xiv, 1-183. doi: 10.3310/hta10280.
9
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
10
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.静脉注射硫酸镁和索他洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280.

引用本文的文献

1
Telementoring for surgical training in low-resource settings: a systematic review of current systems and the emerging role of 5G, AI, and XR.资源匮乏地区外科手术培训的远程指导:对当前系统以及5G、人工智能和扩展现实的新兴作用的系统评价
J Robot Surg. 2025 Aug 28;19(1):525. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02703-9.
2
Hysterectomy for oncological and non-oncological reasons in patients over 70 years.70岁以上患者因肿瘤及非肿瘤原因进行子宫切除术。
J Robot Surg. 2025 Aug 27;19(1):517. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02721-7.
3
Costing methodologies in robotic ventral hernia repair: a scoping review.

本文引用的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence-Aided Colonoscopy for Adenoma Detection in Colon Cancer Screening.人工智能辅助结肠镜检查在结肠癌筛查中检测腺瘤的成本效益
J Can Assoc Gastroenterol. 2023 Apr 7;6(3):97-105. doi: 10.1093/jcag/gwad014. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
Cost-effectiveness of robotic-assisted surgery vs open surgery in the context of partial nephrectomy for small kidney tumors.机器人辅助手术与开放性手术在小肾肿瘤部分肾切除术治疗中的成本效益比较。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Aug;17(4):1571-1578. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01552-8. Epub 2023 Mar 15.
3
Robotic Surgery: A Narrative Review.
机器人腹疝修补术的成本核算方法:一项范围综述
Hernia. 2025 May 23;29(1):182. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03358-z.
4
Implementation of a robotic-assisted thoracic surgery program for anatomical lung resections, a single surgeon's experience.实施机器人辅助胸外科解剖性肺切除术计划:一位外科医生的经验
J Thorac Dis. 2025 Mar 31;17(3):1335-1348. doi: 10.21037/jtd-24-1182. Epub 2025 Mar 20.
5
Current status and prospects of robotic surgery adoption in obstetrics and gynecology: insights from a nationwide survey.妇产科机器人手术应用的现状与前景:来自一项全国性调查的见解
J Robot Surg. 2025 Feb 12;19(1):67. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02197-x.
6
Comparative Evaluation of Major Robotic Systems in Microanastomosis Procedures: A Systematic Review of Current Capabilities and Future Potential.显微吻合手术中主要机器人系统的比较评估:当前能力与未来潜力的系统评价
Brain Sci. 2024 Dec 9;14(12):1235. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14121235.
7
Minimally Invasive Management of Inguinal Lymph Nodes in Penile Cancer: Recent Progress and Remaining Challenges.阴茎癌腹股沟淋巴结的微创管理:最新进展与尚存挑战
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Aug 23;16(17):2935. doi: 10.3390/cancers16172935.
8
Is It the Best Option? Robotic Surgery for Endometriosis.这是最佳选择吗?子宫内膜异位症的机器人手术
Life (Basel). 2024 Aug 5;14(8):982. doi: 10.3390/life14080982.
9
Initial experience with robotic technology for thoracic surgery using the da Vinci Xi system in Tibet, China.中国西藏地区使用达芬奇 Xi 系统进行胸外科手术的机器人技术初步经验。
Front Surg. 2024 May 30;11:1415704. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1415704. eCollection 2024.
10
Cost analysis of new robotic competitors: a comparison of direct costs for initial hospital stay between Da Vinci and Hugo RAS for radical prostatectomy.新型机器人竞争者的成本分析:达芬奇与 Hugo RAS 根治性前列腺切除术初始住院费用的直接成本比较。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Jun 13;18(1):251. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01930-w.
机器人手术:一篇叙述性综述。
Cureus. 2022 Sep 15;14(9):e29179. doi: 10.7759/cureus.29179. eCollection 2022 Sep.
4
First Canadian experience with same-day discharge after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.加拿大首例机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后当日出院的经验。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2023 Feb;17(2):39-43. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.7914.
5
Systematic literature review of cost-effectiveness analyses of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy for localised prostate cancer.系统评价机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术治疗局限性前列腺癌的成本效益分析。
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 20;12(9):e058394. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058394.
6
Novel Strategies for Managing Retropharyngeal Lymph Node Metastases in Head and Neck and Thyroid Cancer with Transoral Robotic Surgery (TORS).经口机器人手术(TORS)治疗头颈部和甲状腺癌咽后淋巴结转移的新策略。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Nov;29(12):7881-7890. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-12208-6. Epub 2022 Jul 16.
7
Should Robotic Surgery Training Become a General Surgery Residency Requirement? A National Survey of Program Directors in Surgery.机器人手术培训是否应成为普通外科住院医师培训的要求?一项针对外科项目主任的全国性调查。
J Surg Educ. 2022 Nov-Dec;79(6):e242-e247. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2022.06.010. Epub 2022 Jul 10.
8
More work is needed on cost-utility analyses of robotic-assisted surgery.还需要更多关于机器人辅助手术成本效用分析的工作。
J Evid Based Med. 2022 Jun;15(2):77-96. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12475. Epub 2022 Jun 18.
9
Outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic surgery for benign gynaecological disease: a systematic review.机器人和腹腔镜手术治疗良性妇科疾病的结果:系统评价。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Aug;42(6):1635-1641. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2022.2070732. Epub 2022 Jun 13.
10
Robot-Assisted Surgery vs Robotic Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Prostate Cancer: A Cost-Utility Analysis.机器人辅助手术与机器人立体定向体部放疗在前列腺癌治疗中的成本效益分析
Front Oncol. 2022 May 24;12:834023. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.834023. eCollection 2022.