Suppr超能文献

定量血流比与仅血管造影指导下的 STEMI 患者 PCI:一年心血管结局。

Quantitative flow ratio vs. angiography-only guided PCI in STEMI patients: one-year cardiovascular outcomes.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.

Institute of Cardiology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.

出版信息

BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2023 Mar 14;23(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12872-023-03153-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Coronary physiology-guided PCIs are recommended worldwide. However, invasive coronary physiology methods prolong the procedure, create additional risks for the patients, and prolong the fluoroscopy time for an interventional cardiologist. Otherwise, there is a noninvasive coronary physiology evaluation method, QFR, that can be safely used even in STEMI patients.

METHODS

A total of 198 patients admitted with STEMI and at least one intermediate (35-75%) diameter stenosis other than the culprit artery between July 2020 and June 2021 were prospectively included in this single-center study. All patients were randomized into one of two groups (1 - QFR-guided PCI; 2 - visual-estimation-only guided PCI). A 12-month follow-up with echocardiography, exercise stress test, and quality of life evaluation was performed in all included patients. For the QOF evaluation, the Seattle Angina Score Questionnaire was chosen. Statistical analysis was performed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, Student's t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, Pearson's chi-squared test and Kaplan-Meier estimator.

RESULTS

Ninety-eight (49.5%) patients were randomized to the first group, and 100 (50.5%) patients were included in the second group. Statistically, significantly more patients had a medical history of dyslipidemia (98 vs. 91, p = 0.002) and slightly better left ventricular ejection fraction (42.21 ± 7.88 vs. 39.45 ± 9.62, p = 0.045) in the QFR group. Six fewer patients required non-culprit artery revascularization within the 12-month FU in the QFR group (1.02% vs. 6%, p = 0.047). Survival analysis proved that patients in the Angio group had a more than 6-fold greater risk for death within a 12-month period after MI (OR 6.23, 95% CI 2.20-17.87, p = 0.006), with the highest mortality risk within the first two months after initial treatment.

CONCLUSION

Using QFR in non-culprit lesions in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction reduces mortality and revascularization at the 12-month follow-up and improves the quality of life of the patient.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was approved by the Regional Bioethical Committee and conducted under the principles of the Helsinki Declaration and local laws and regulations.

摘要

背景

全球范围内都推荐采用基于冠状动脉生理学的 PCI。然而,有创的冠状动脉生理学方法会延长手术时间,为患者带来额外的风险,并延长介入心脏病专家的透视时间。另外,还有一种非侵入性的冠状动脉生理学评估方法,即 QFR,可以安全地用于 STEMI 患者。

方法

本研究为单中心前瞻性研究,共纳入 2020 年 7 月至 2021 年 6 月期间因 STEMI 入院且罪犯动脉以外的至少一支中间直径狭窄(35-75%)的 198 例患者。所有患者均随机分为两组(1 - QFR 指导 PCI;2 - 仅视觉评估指导 PCI)。所有纳入患者均进行 12 个月的超声心动图、运动负荷试验和生活质量评估随访。在 QOF 评估中,选择了西雅图心绞痛问卷。使用 Kolmogorov-Smirnov 检验、学生 t 检验、Mann-Whitney U 检验、Pearson 卡方检验和 Kaplan-Meier 估计进行统计分析。

结果

98 例(49.5%)患者被随机分配到第一组,100 例(50.5%)患者被分配到第二组。统计学上,QFR 组有更多的患者有血脂异常病史(98 例比 91 例,p=0.002),左心室射血分数略好(42.21±7.88 比 39.45±9.62,p=0.045)。QFR 组在 12 个月的 FU 期间,需要非罪犯动脉血运重建的患者少 6 例(1.02%比 6%,p=0.047)。生存分析证明,在 MI 后 12 个月内,Angio 组患者死亡的风险是前者的 6 倍以上(OR 6.23,95%CI 2.20-17.87,p=0.006),在初始治疗后的头两个月内,死亡风险最高。

结论

在 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的非罪犯病变中使用 QFR 可降低 12 个月时的死亡率和血运重建率,并提高患者的生活质量。

试验注册

该研究得到了区域生物伦理委员会的批准,并根据赫尔辛基宣言和当地法律法规的原则进行。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4d1/10015917/625c7c47b67b/12872_2023_3153_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验