Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, 550 16th St, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA.
Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Mar 14;23(1):254. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09261-6.
Person-centered maternity care (PCMC) has become a priority in the global health discourse on quality of care due to the high prevalence of disrespectful and lack of responsive care during facility-based childbirth. Although PCMC is generally sub-optimal, there are significant disparities. On average, women of low socioeconomic status (SES) tend to receive poorer PCMC than women of higher SES. Yet few studies have explored factors underlying these inequities. In this study, we examined provider implicit and explicit biases that could lead to inequitable PCMC based on SES.
Data are from a cross-sectional survey with 150 providers recruited from 19 health facilities in the Upper East region of Ghana from October 2020 to January 2021. Explicit SES bias was assessed using situationally-specific vignettes (low SES and high SES characteristics) on providers' perceptions of women's expectations, attitudes, and behaviors. Implicit SES bias was assessed using an Implicit Association Test (IAT) that measures associations between women's SES characteristics and providers' perceptions of women as 'difficult' or 'good'. Analysis included descriptive statistics, mixed-model ANOVA, and bivariate and multivariate linear regression.
The average explicit bias score was 18.1 out of 28 (SD = 3.60) for the low SES woman vignette and 16.9 out of 28 (SD = 3.15) for the high SES woman vignette (p < 0.001), suggesting stronger negative explicit bias towards the lower SES woman. These biases manifested in higher agreement to statements such as the low SES woman in the vignette is not likely to expect providers to introduce themselves and is not likely to understand explanations. The average IAT score was 0.71 (SD = 0.43), indicating a significant bias in associating positive characteristics with high SES women and negative characteristics with low SES women. Providers with higher education had significantly lower explicit bias scores on the low SES vignette than those with less education. Providers in private facilities had higher IAT scores than those in government hospitals.
The findings provide evidence of both implicit and explicit SES bias among maternity providers. These biases need to be addressed in interventions to achieve equity in PCMC and to improve PCMC for all women.
由于在医疗机构分娩过程中普遍存在不尊重和缺乏响应性护理的情况,以产妇为中心的产时护理(PCMC)已成为全球护理质量话语中的一个优先事项。尽管 PCMC 通常不太理想,但存在着显著的差异。平均而言,社会经济地位(SES)较低的女性往往比 SES 较高的女性接受较差的 PCMC。然而,很少有研究探讨导致这些不平等现象的背后因素。在这项研究中,我们研究了基于 SES 的提供者的内隐和外显偏见,这些偏见可能导致 PCMC 的不公平。
数据来自于 2020 年 10 月至 2021 年 1 月期间在加纳上东部地区的 19 个卫生机构招募的 150 名提供者的横断面调查。通过特定情境的情景模拟(SES 较低和较高的特征)评估了提供者对女性期望、态度和行为的外显 SES 偏见。使用内隐联想测验(IAT)评估了内隐 SES 偏见,该测验测量了女性 SES 特征与提供者对女性“困难”或“良好”的感知之间的关联。分析包括描述性统计、混合模型方差分析以及单变量和多变量线性回归。
低 SES 女性情景模拟的平均外显偏见得分为 18.1 分(28 分制,标准差=3.60),高 SES 女性情景模拟的平均外显偏见得分为 16.9 分(28 分制,标准差=3.15)(p<0.001),这表明对 SES 较低的女性的负面外显偏见更强。这些偏见表现为对情景模拟中的低 SES 女性的更高一致性,例如,该女性不太可能期望提供者自我介绍,也不太可能理解解释。IAT 的平均得分为 0.71(标准差=0.43),表明在将积极特征与 SES 较高的女性相关联和将消极特征与 SES 较低的女性相关联方面存在显著偏见。受教育程度较高的提供者在低 SES 情景模拟中的外显偏见得分明显低于受教育程度较低的提供者。私立机构的提供者的 IAT 得分高于政府医院的提供者。
研究结果为产妇提供者中存在的内隐和外显 SES 偏见提供了证据。在干预措施中需要解决这些偏见,以实现 PCMC 的公平性,并改善所有女性的 PCMC。