• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种可扩展的共情心态干预措施可减少学校停学方面的群体差异。

A scalable empathic-mindset intervention reduces group disparities in school suspensions.

作者信息

Okonofua Jason A, Goyer J Parker, Lindsay Constance A, Haugabrook Johnetta, Walton Gregory M

机构信息

University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.

Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

出版信息

Sci Adv. 2022 Mar 25;8(12):eabj0691. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abj0691. Epub 2022 Mar 23.

DOI:10.1126/sciadv.abj0691
PMID:35319976
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8942350/
Abstract

Suspensions remove students from the learning environment at high rates throughout the United States. Policy and theory highlight social groups that face disproportionately high suspension rates-racial-minoritized students, students with a prior suspension, and students with disabilities. We used an active placebo-controlled, longitudinal field experiment ( = 66, = 5822) to test a scalable "empathic-mindset" intervention, a 45- to 70-min online exercise to refocus middle school teachers on understanding and valuing the perspectives of students and on sustaining positive relationships even when students misbehave. In preregistered analyses, this exercise reduced suspension rates especially for Black and Hispanic students, cutting the racial disparity over the school year from 10.6 to 5.9 percentage points, a 45% reduction. Significant reductions were also observed for other groups of concern. Moreover, reductions persisted through the next year when students interacted with different teachers, suggesting that empathic treatment with even one teacher in a critical period can improve students' trajectories through school.

摘要

在美国,停学措施使大量学生脱离学习环境。政策和理论强调了那些面临极高停学率的社会群体——少数族裔学生、有过停学记录的学生以及残疾学生。我们进行了一项积极的安慰剂对照纵向实地实验(n = 66,N = 5822),以测试一种可扩展的“共情心态”干预措施,这是一项时长45至70分钟的在线练习,旨在让中学教师重新关注理解和重视学生的观点,并即使在学生行为不端时也能维持积极的关系。在预先注册的分析中,这项练习尤其降低了黑人和西班牙裔学生的停学率,在整个学年中将种族差距从10.6个百分点降至5.9个百分点,降幅达45%。对于其他受关注的群体也观察到了显著下降。此外,当学生与不同教师互动时,这种下降在次年依然持续,这表明在关键时期与哪怕一位教师进行共情式对待都可以改善学生在学校的发展轨迹。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ca2/8942350/cf25fb1bf630/sciadv.abj0691-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ca2/8942350/028d763d8754/sciadv.abj0691-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ca2/8942350/cf25fb1bf630/sciadv.abj0691-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ca2/8942350/028d763d8754/sciadv.abj0691-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ca2/8942350/cf25fb1bf630/sciadv.abj0691-f2.jpg

相似文献

1
A scalable empathic-mindset intervention reduces group disparities in school suspensions.一种可扩展的共情心态干预措施可减少学校停学方面的群体差异。
Sci Adv. 2022 Mar 25;8(12):eabj0691. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abj0691. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
2
Brief intervention to encourage empathic discipline cuts suspension rates in half among adolescents.鼓励共情式管教的简短干预措施使青少年的停学率减半。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 May 10;113(19):5221-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1523698113. Epub 2016 Apr 25.
3
A values-aligned intervention fosters growth mindset-supportive teaching and reduces inequality in educational outcomes.一项价值观一致的干预措施可以促进成长型思维支持型教学,并减少教育成果的不平等。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Jun 20;120(25):e2210704120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2210704120. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
4
Targeted identity-safety interventions cause lasting reductions in discipline citations among negatively stereotyped boys.有针对性的身份安全干预措施会导致被负面刻板印象化的男孩受到的纪律处分减少。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2019 Aug;117(2):229-259. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000152. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
5
A Vicious Cycle: A Social-Psychological Account of Extreme Racial Disparities in School Discipline.一个恶性循环:学校纪律中极端种族差异的社会心理学解释。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2016 May;11(3):381-98. doi: 10.1177/1745691616635592.
6
The Theories of the Development of Students: A Factor to Shape Teacher Empathy From the Perspective of Motivation.学生发展理论:从动机角度看塑造教师同理心的一个因素
Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 16;12:736656. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.736656. eCollection 2021.
7
A Cluster Randomized Pilot Trial of the Equity-Explicit Establish-Maintain-Restore Program among High School Teachers and Students.一项针对高中教师和学生的公平明确的建立-维持-恢复计划的整群随机试点试验。
School Ment Health. 2022;14(4):951-966. doi: 10.1007/s12310-022-09516-3. Epub 2022 Apr 15.
8
An Internet-supported Physical Activity Intervention Delivered in Secondary Schools Located in Low Socio-economic Status Communities: Study Protocol for the Activity and Motivation in Physical Education (AMPED) Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.一项在社会经济地位较低社区的中学开展的互联网支持的体育活动干预:体育活动与动机(AMPED)整群随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Jan 6;16:17. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2583-7.
9
Disparities in Learning Mode Access Among K-12 Students During the COVID-19 Pandemic, by Race/Ethnicity, Geography, and Grade Level - United States, September 2020-April 2021.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,美国 K-12 学生在学习模式方面存在种族/族裔、地理位置和年级差异,2020 年 9 月至 2021 年 4 月。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021 Jul 2;70(26):953-958. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7026e2.
10
Are students with disabilities suspended more frequently than otherwise similar students without disabilities?残疾学生比非残疾学生更容易被停学吗?
J Sch Psychol. 2019 Feb;72:1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2018.11.001. Epub 2018 Dec 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Longitudinal within- and between-person effects of school discrimination on U.S. Latino/a adolescents' prosocial behaviors.学校歧视对美国拉丁裔青少年亲社会行为的纵向个体内和个体间影响。
Dev Psychol. 2025 May 12. doi: 10.1037/dev0001989.
2
Examining racial and ethnic differences in youth psychotherapy treatment engagement and outcomes.研究青少年心理治疗参与度和治疗效果中的种族和民族差异。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2024 Nov;92(11):769-778. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000919.
3
Provider implicit and explicit bias in person-centered maternity care: a cross-sectional study with maternity providers in Northern Ghana.

本文引用的文献

1
Lifting the Bar: A Relationship-Orienting Intervention Reduces Recidivism Among Children Reentering School From Juvenile Detention.提升成效:面向关系的干预措施减少了重返学校的少年拘留所少年的累犯率。
Psychol Sci. 2021 Nov;32(11):1747-1767. doi: 10.1177/09567976211013801. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
2
SCHOOL PUNISHMENT AND INTERPERSONAL EXCLUSION: REJECTION, WITHDRAWAL, AND SEPARATION FROM FRIENDS.学校惩罚与人际排斥:被朋友拒绝、回避及疏离
Criminology. 2020 Feb;58(1):35-69. doi: 10.1111/1745-9125.12227. Epub 2019 Sep 13.
3
Disproportionate School Punishment and Significant Life Outcomes: A Prospective Analysis of Black Youths.
以加纳北部的产妇服务提供者为对象的横断面研究:以人为中心的产妇护理中的提供者内隐和外显偏见。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Mar 14;23(1):254. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09261-6.
4
The Impact of Restorative Practices on the Use of Out-of-School Suspensions: Results from a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.《恢复性实践对校外停学使用的影响:一项整群随机对照试验的结果》。
Prev Sci. 2023 Jul;24(5):962-973. doi: 10.1007/s11121-023-01507-3. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
不成比例的学校惩罚与重要人生结果:对黑人青年的前瞻性分析。
Psychol Sci. 2021 Sep;32(9):1375-1390. doi: 10.1177/0956797621998308. Epub 2021 Aug 13.
4
Behavioural science is unlikely to change the world without a heterogeneity revolution.没有异质性革命,行为科学不太可能改变世界。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Aug;5(8):980-989. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01143-3. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
5
Exploring the School-to-Prison Pipeline: How School Suspensions Influence Incarceration During Young Adulthood.探索学校到监狱的通道:学校停学如何影响青年成年期的监禁情况。
Youth Violence Juv Justice. 2020 Jul;18(3):235-255. doi: 10.1177/1541204019880945. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
6
The Effect of School Discipline on Offending across Time.学校纪律对不同时期犯罪行为的影响。
Justice Q. 2020;37(4):739-760. doi: 10.1080/07418825.2019.1625428. Epub 2019 Jul 12.
7
UNPACKING THE DRIVERS OF RACIAL DISPARITIES IN SCHOOL SUSPENSION AND EXPULSION.剖析学校停学和开除处分中种族差异的驱动因素。
Soc Forces. 2020 Jun;98(4):1548-1577. doi: 10.1093/sf/soz095. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
8
When policy and psychology meet: Mitigating the consequences of bias in schools.当政策与心理学相遇:减轻学校中偏见的后果。
Sci Adv. 2020 Oct 16;6(42). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aba9479. Print 2020 Oct.
9
Seed and Soil: Psychological Affordances in Contexts Help to Explain Where Wise Interventions Succeed or Fail.种子与土壤:情境中的心理可供性有助于解释明智干预何时成功或失败。
Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2020 Jun;29(3):219-226. doi: 10.1177/0963721420904453. Epub 2020 Apr 14.
10
Health Equity, School Discipline Reform, and Restorative Justice.健康公平、学校纪律改革与恢复性司法。
J Law Med Ethics. 2019 Jun;47(2_suppl):47-50. doi: 10.1177/1073110519857316.