Department of Population & Development, International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai, 400088, Maharashtra, India.
Department of Mathematical Demography & Statistics, International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai, 400088, Maharashtra, India.
BMC Womens Health. 2023 Mar 14;23(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02252-z.
Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) is one of the most common forms of violence against women. IPV against adolescents and young adult married women (15-19 years only) is poorly understood and not much researched as compared to their adult counterparts. The present study investigates the changes in multiple forms of IPV and tries to understand its association with different individual factors.
The study used longitudinal data from Understanding the lives of Adolescent and Young Adults study (UDAYA), conducted in 2015-16 (wave 1) and 2018-19 (wave 2). The survey was done in two Indian states namely, Uttar Pradesh and Bihar. The sample size of the present study was 4,254 married adolescent girls aged 15-19 years. Multiple forms of IPV were the outcome variables of this study. A random effect regression analysis was used to estimate the association of changes in physical, sexual, and emotional violence with decision-making power and mobility restrictions along with other covariates.
Findings show that physical and emotional violence have increased from wave 1 to wave 2. Furthermore, married adolescent girls who took decisions alone/with others were less likely to suffer from IPV (β=-0.02; p < 0.05). Adolescent girls who agreed with the perception about wife-beating were more likely to report physical (β = 0.07; p < 0.05), sexual (β = 0.13; p < 0.05), and emotional violence (β = 0.14; p < 0.05). The risk of IPV was significantly more among adolescent girls whose family paid dowry compared to those who did not pay it (β = 0.04; p < 0.05).
Interventions against those social norms that harm any female adolescents' status in society and negatively impact their educational attainment should be adopted, simultaneously, with programs that promote gender equality in all aspects of their life.
亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)是针对妇女的最常见暴力形式之一。与成年同龄人相比,针对青少年和年轻已婚妇女(仅 15-19 岁)的 IPV 认识不足,研究也较少。本研究调查了多种形式的 IPV 的变化,并试图了解其与不同个体因素的关联。
本研究使用了 2015-16 年(第 1 波)和 2018-19 年(第 2 波)进行的青少年和年轻成年人理解生活研究(UDAYA)的纵向数据。调查在印度的北方邦和比哈尔邦两个邦进行。本研究的样本量为 4254 名 15-19 岁的已婚青少年女孩。本研究的因变量是多种形式的 IPV。使用随机效应回归分析来估计物理、性和情感暴力变化与决策权和行动限制之间的关联,以及其他协变量。
研究结果表明,从第 1 波到第 2 波,身体和情感暴力有所增加。此外,独自/与他人共同做出决定的已婚少女遭受 IPV 的可能性较小(β=-0.02;p<0.05)。同意打老婆观念的少女更有可能报告身体暴力(β=0.07;p<0.05)、性暴力(β=0.13;p<0.05)和情感暴力(β=0.14;p<0.05)。与没有支付嫁妆的少女相比,支付嫁妆的少女遭受 IPV 的风险明显更高(β=0.04;p<0.05)。
应采取干预措施,反对那些损害任何少女在社会中的地位并对其教育程度产生负面影响的社会规范,同时开展促进其生活各个方面性别平等的方案。