Amir-Ud-Din Rafi, Idrees Rubina, Farooqui Javaria, Abbasi Abdus Sattar
Department of Economics, COMSATS University Islamabad, Lahore Campus, Lahore, Pakistan.
Department of Humanities, COMSATS University Islamabad, Lahore Campus, Lahore, Pakistan.
Womens Health (Lond). 2024 Jan-Dec;20:17455057241310289. doi: 10.1177/17455057241310289.
Intimate partner violence (IPV) is widespread and is influenced by individual-specific factors. However, the impact of spousal sociodemographic disparities (age, earnings, education) remains understudied.
This study investigates the relationship between spousal sociodemographic disparities and women's IPV experiences in 29 developing countries in South Asia, Sub-Saharan Africa, and the Middle East and North Africa.
We used a cross-sectional design, analyzing data from the Integrated Public Use Microdata Series-Demographic and Health Surveys (IPUMS-DHS).
We conducted logistic regression to assess associations between spousal disparities and four forms of IPV including less severe physical violence (LSPV), severe physical violence (SPV), emotional violence (EV), and sexual violence (SV) based on spousal age, earnings, and education disparities.
The analysis revealed that spousal education disparities are significantly associated with increased IPV odds. Women with more educated husbands faced higher odds of LSPV (OR = 1.044, 95% CI = 1.01, 1.08; < 0.05) and SV (OR = 1.085, 95% CI = 1.04, 1.14; < 0.01), with no significant association for SPV or EV. Larger spousal age gaps were consistently associated with a reduced probability of all IPV forms, particularly LSPV (OR = 0.765, 95% CI = 0.72, 0.81; < 0.001) and SV (OR = 0.656, 95% CI = 0.58, 0.74; < 0.001). Earnings disparities also played a crucial role: women earning more than their husbands faced higher odds of LSPV (OR = 1.361, 95% CI = 1.23, 1.50; < 0.001), EV (OR = 1.573, 95% CI = 1.42, 1.74; < 0.001), and SV (OR = 1.624, 95% CI = 1.42, 1.86; < 0.001). When husbands earned more, women also faced higher odds of IPV, although these associations were weaker.
The findings underscore the need for targeted policies to prevent IPV, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, by addressing spousal disparities in age, earnings, and education to promote gender equality.
亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)普遍存在,且受个体特定因素影响。然而,配偶社会人口学差异(年龄、收入、教育程度)的影响仍未得到充分研究。
本研究调查了南亚、撒哈拉以南非洲以及中东和北非29个发展中国家配偶社会人口学差异与女性IPV经历之间的关系。
我们采用横断面设计,分析了综合公共使用微观数据系列-人口与健康调查(IPUMS-DHS)的数据。
我们进行了逻辑回归,以评估基于配偶年龄、收入和教育程度差异的配偶差异与四种形式的IPV之间的关联,这四种形式包括不太严重的身体暴力(LSPV)、严重身体暴力(SPV)、情感暴力(EV)和性暴力(SV)。
分析表明,配偶教育程度差异与IPV几率增加显著相关。丈夫受教育程度较高的女性面临LSPV(OR = 1.044,95%CI = 1.01,1.08;<0.05)和SV(OR = 1.085,95%CI = 1.04,1.14;<0.01)的几率更高,而与SPV或EV无显著关联。较大的配偶年龄差距始终与所有形式的IPV发生概率降低相关,尤其是LSPV(OR = 0.765,95%CI = 0.72,0.81;<0.001)和SV(OR = 0.656,95%CI = 0.58,0.74;<0.001)。收入差异也起着关键作用:收入高于丈夫的女性面临LSPV(OR = 1.361,95%CI = 1.23,1.50;<0.001)、EV(OR = 1.573,95%CI = 1.42,1.74;<0.001)和SV(OR = 1.624,95%CI = 1.42,1.86;<0.001)的几率更高。当丈夫收入更高时,女性面临IPV的几率也更高,尽管这些关联较弱。
研究结果强调了制定针对性政策以预防IPV的必要性,特别是在低收入和中等收入国家,通过解决配偶在年龄、收入和教育方面的差异来促进性别平等。