Kambic Tim, Božič Mijovski Mojca, Jug Borut, Hadžić Vedran, Lainscak Mitja
Cardiac Rehabilitation Unit, General Hospital Murska Sobota, 9000, Murska Sobota, Slovenia.
Faculty of Sport, University of Ljubljana, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2023 Mar 15;15(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s13098-023-01017-w.
The effect of resistance training (RT) in cardiac rehabilitation (CR) on insulin resistance remains elusive. We examined whether the addition of high-load (HL) or low loads (LL) RT has any effect on the levels of insulin resistance and lipids versus aerobic training (AT) alone in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD).
Seventy-nine CAD patients were randomised to HL-RT [70-80% of one repetition maximum (1-RM)] and AT, LL-RT (35-40% of 1-RM) and AT or AT (50-80% of maximal power output), and 59 patients [75% males, 15% diabetics, age: 61 (8) years, left ventricular ejection fraction: 53 (9) %] completed the study. Plasma levels of glucose, insulin, blood lipids [total cholesterol, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein (LDL)] cholesterol and body composition were measured at baseline and post-training (36 training sessions).
Training intervention had only time effect on lean mass (p = 0.002), total and LDL cholesterol levels (both p < 0.001), and no effects on levels of glucose and insulin resistance (homeostatic assessment 2-insulin resistance). Total and LDL cholesterols levels decreased following AT [mean difference (95% confidence interval); total cholesterol: - 0.4 mmol/l (- 0.7 mmol/l, - 0.1 mmol/l), p = 0.013; LDL: - 0.4 mmol/l (- 0.7 mmol/l, - 0.1 mmol/l), p = 0.006] and HL-RT [total cholesterol: - 0.5 mmol/l (- 0.8 mmol/l, - 0.2 mmol/l), p = 0.002; LDL: - 0.5 mol/l (- 0.7 mmol/l, - 0.2 mmol/l), p = 0.002]. No associations were observed between post-training change in body composition and post-training change in blood biomarkers.
RT when combined with AT had no additional effect beyond AT alone on fasting glucose metabolism, blood lipids and body composition in patients with CAD. Trial registration number NCT04638764.
心脏康复(CR)中的阻力训练(RT)对胰岛素抵抗的影响仍不明确。我们研究了在冠状动脉疾病(CAD)患者中,与单独进行有氧训练(AT)相比,增加高负荷(HL)或低负荷(LL)RT对胰岛素抵抗水平和血脂是否有任何影响。
79例CAD患者被随机分为HL-RT组[一组重复最大值(1-RM)的70-80%]加AT组、LL-RT组(1-RM的35-40%)加AT组或AT组(最大功率输出的50-80%),59例患者[75%为男性,15%为糖尿病患者,年龄:61(8)岁,左心室射血分数:53(9)%]完成了研究。在基线和训练后(36次训练课程)测量血浆葡萄糖、胰岛素、血脂[总胆固醇、甘油三酯、高密度脂蛋白(HDL)胆固醇和低密度脂蛋白(LDL)胆固醇]水平以及身体成分。
训练干预仅对瘦体重(p = 0.002)、总胆固醇和LDL胆固醇水平(均p < 0.001)有时间效应,对葡萄糖和胰岛素抵抗水平(稳态评估2-胰岛素抵抗)无影响。AT组[平均差异(95%置信区间);总胆固醇:-0.4 mmol/l(-0.7 mmol/l,-0.1 mmol/l),p = 0.013;LDL:-0.4 mmol/l(-0.7 mmol/l,-0.1 mmol/l),p = 0.006]和HL-RT组[总胆固醇:-0.5 mmol/l(-0.8 mmol/l,-0.2 mmol/l),p = 0.002;LDL:-0.5 mmol/l(-0.7 mmol/l,-0.2 mmol/l),p = 0.002]的总胆固醇和LDL胆固醇水平下降。未观察到训练后身体成分变化与训练后血液生物标志物变化之间的关联。
在CAD患者中,RT与AT联合使用对空腹血糖代谢、血脂和身体成分的影响并不比单独使用AT更大。试验注册号NCT04638764。