Suppr超能文献

半月板挤出是决定部分内侧半月板后根撕裂关节镜治疗的一个诱发因素。

Meniscus extrusion is a predisposing factor for determining arthroscopic treatments in partial medial meniscus posterior root tears.

作者信息

Furumatsu Takayuki, Kintaka Keisuke, Higashihara Naohiro, Tamura Masanori, Kawada Koki, Xue Haowei, Ozaki Toshifumi

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2-5-1 Shikatacho, Kitaku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan.

出版信息

Knee Surg Relat Res. 2023 Mar 14;35(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s43019-023-00182-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with partial medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs) sometimes require arthroscopic pullout repair because of their intolerable/repeated knee pains and continuous disturbance in gait during activities of daily living. However, the predisposing factors for future knee surgery in patients with partial MMPRTs remain unclear. We compared the findings of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) between patients who underwent pullout repair and nonoperative management following partial MMPRTs.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients who required arthroscopic repair for partial MMPRTs and 23 patients who were managed nonoperatively were evaluated during a mean follow-up period of 27.1 months. Sex, age, height, body weight, body mass index, duration from onset to initial MRI, MRI findings, and medial meniscus (MM) extrusion were compared between the two groups. Linear regression analysis was used to assess the correlation between MM extrusion and duration from onset to MRI examination.

RESULTS

No significant differences were observed between the pullout repair and nonoperative management groups in terms of patient demographics and the positive ratio of MRI-based root tear signs. However, absolute MM extrusion in the pullout repair group (3.49 ± 0.82 mm) was larger than that in the nonoperative management group (2.48 ± 0.60 mm, P < 0.001). Extrusion of the MM (> 3 mm) was detected more frequently in the pullout repair group than in the nonoperative management group (P < 0.001). The odds ratio in the pullout repair and MM extrusion > 3 mm cases was 9.662. Linear regression analysis revealed a fair correlation between the duration from onset to MRI and MM extrusion only in the pullout repair group (0.462 mm/month increase in MM extrusion).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that more severe MM extrusions were observed in the pullout repair group than in the nonoperative management group. Major extrusion (> 3 mm) was also observed more in the pullout repair group than in the nonoperative group. Assessing MM extrusion and its severity can help determine a valid treatment for patients with partial MMPRTs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, Retrospective comparative study.

摘要

背景

部分内侧半月板后根撕裂(MMPRT)患者有时因难以忍受的/反复的膝关节疼痛以及日常生活活动中持续的步态干扰而需要进行关节镜下拔出修复。然而,部分MMPRT患者未来膝关节手术的诱发因素仍不清楚。我们比较了部分MMPRT患者接受拔出修复与非手术治疗后的磁共振成像(MRI)结果。

方法

对25例因部分MMPRT需要进行关节镜修复的患者和23例接受非手术治疗的患者进行了平均27.1个月的随访评估。比较了两组患者的性别、年龄、身高、体重、体重指数、从发病到初次MRI的时间、MRI结果以及内侧半月板(MM)挤出情况。采用线性回归分析评估MM挤出与从发病到MRI检查时间之间的相关性。

结果

在患者人口统计学特征和基于MRI的根部撕裂体征阳性率方面,拔出修复组与非手术治疗组之间未观察到显著差异。然而,拔出修复组的绝对MM挤出量(3.49±0.82mm)大于非手术治疗组(2.48±0.60mm,P<0.001)。拔出修复组中MM挤出(>3mm)的检出频率高于非手术治疗组(P<0.001)。拔出修复组与MM挤出>3mm病例的比值比为9.662。线性回归分析显示,仅在拔出修复组中,从发病到MRI的时间与MM挤出之间存在中等程度的相关性(MM挤出每月增加0.462mm)。

结论

本研究表明,拔出修复组比非手术治疗组观察到更严重的MM挤出。拔出修复组中主要挤出(>3mm)的情况也比非手术组更多。评估MM挤出及其严重程度有助于确定部分MMPRT患者的有效治疗方法。

证据级别

IV,回顾性比较研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3569/10012578/ece5492bc33a/43019_2023_182_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验