Martino Simone, Kenter Jasper O
Department of Environment and Geography, University of York, York, YO10 5NG UK.
The James Hutton Institute, AB15 8QH Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen, Scotland.
Eur J Wildl Res. 2023;69(2):32. doi: 10.1007/s10344-023-01658-2. Epub 2023 Mar 10.
This paper reviews concepts and methods for the economic valuation of nature in the context of wildlife conservation and questions them in light of alternative approaches based on deliberation. Economic valuations have been used to set priorities, consider opportunity costs, assess co-benefits of conservation, support the case for conservation in public awareness and advocacy, and drive novel schemes to change incentives. We discuss the foundational principles of mainstream economic valuation in terms of its assumptions about values, markets, and human behaviour; propose a list of valuation studies in relation to wildlife protection; and explain the methods used. We then review critiques of these approaches focusing on the narrow way in which economics conceives of values, and institutional, power, and equity concerns. Finally, we complement conventional approaches commonly used for wildlife valuation with two forms of deliberative valuation: deliberated preferences and deliberative democratic monetary valuation. These are discussed in terms of their potential to address the drawbacks of mainstream economics and to realise the potential of valuation in bridging conservation of nature for its own sake and its important contributions to human well-being.
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10344-023-01658-2.
本文回顾了野生动物保护背景下自然的经济价值评估概念和方法,并根据基于审议的替代方法对其提出质疑。经济价值评估已被用于确定优先事项、考虑机会成本、评估保护的协同效益、在公众意识和宣传中支持保护理由,以及推动改变激励措施的新方案。我们从主流经济价值评估对价值、市场和人类行为的假设方面讨论其基本原则;提出一系列与野生动物保护相关的价值评估研究;并解释所使用的方法。然后,我们回顾对这些方法的批评,重点关注经济学对价值的狭隘理解方式以及制度、权力和公平问题。最后,我们用两种审议性价值评估形式补充野生动物价值评估常用的传统方法:审议偏好和审议性民主货币价值评估。讨论了它们在解决主流经济学缺点以及实现价值评估在将出于自身目的的自然保护与其对人类福祉的重要贡献联系起来方面的潜力。
在线版本包含可在10.1007/s10344-023-01658-2获取的补充材料。