Suppr超能文献

非工作时间入院对疑似感染的急诊科患者液体治疗的影响;一项多中心事后分析。

Effect of Out-Of-Hour Admission on Fluid Treatment of Emergency Department Patients with Suspected Infection; a Multicenter Post-Hoc Analysis.

作者信息

Jessen Marie Kristine, Drescher Petersen Anna, Kirkegaard Hans

机构信息

Research Center for Emergency Medicine, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2023 Jan 31;11(1):e21. doi: 10.22037/aaem.v11i1.1839. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Sepsis is a life-threatening and common cause of Emergency department (ED) referrals. Out-of-hour staffing is limited in ED, which may potentially affect fluid administration. This study aimed to investigate fluid volume variation in out-of-hour vs. routine-hour admissions.

METHODS

The present study is a post-hoc analysis of a multicentre, prospective, observational study investigating fluid administration in ED patients with suspected infection, from Jan 20 - March 2 2020. Patient groups were "routine-hours" (RH): weekdays 07:00-18:59 or "out-of-hours" (OOH): weekdays 19:00-06:59 or Friday 19:00-Monday 06:59. Primary outcome was 24-hour total fluid volumes (oral + intravenous (IV)). Secondary outcomes were total fluids 0-6 hours, oral fluids 0-6 and 0-24 hours, and IV fluids 0-6 and 0-24 hours. Linear regression adjusted for site and illness severity was used.

RESULTS

734 patients had suspected infection; 449 were admitted during RH and 287 during OOH. Mean (95% CI) total 24-hour fluid volumes were equal in simple infection and sepsis regardless of admission time: Simple infection RH: 3640 (3410 - 3871) ml and OOH: 3681 (3451 - 3913) ml. Sepsis RH: 3671 (3443;3898) ml and OOH: 3896 (3542;4250) ml. Oral fluids 0-6h were reduced in simple infection and sepsis among OOH vs. RH. Sepsis patients received more 0-6-hour IV fluid when admitted OOH vs. RH. There were no associations between admission time and 0-24-hour oral or IV volumes in simple infection or sepsis.

CONCLUSION

Admission time did not have an association with 24-hour total fluid volumes. Sepsis patients admitted during OOH received more 0-6-hour IV fluids than RH patients, and simple infection and sepsis patients received less oral fluid in 0-6 hours if admitted during OOH vs. RH.

摘要

引言

脓毒症是急诊科转诊的常见且危及生命的病因。急诊科非工作时间的人员配备有限,这可能会对液体输注产生潜在影响。本研究旨在调查非工作时间与常规时间入院患者的液体量变化。

方法

本研究是一项多中心、前瞻性、观察性研究的事后分析,该研究调查了2020年1月20日至3月2日急诊科疑似感染患者的液体输注情况。患者分组为“常规时间”(RH):工作日07:00 - 18:59,或“非工作时间”(OOH):工作日19:00 - 06:59或周五19:00至周一06:59。主要结局是24小时总液体量(口服 + 静脉注射(IV))。次要结局是0 - 6小时的总液体量、0 - 6小时和0 - 24小时的口服液体量以及0 - 6小时和0 - 24小时的静脉注射液体量。使用对地点和疾病严重程度进行调整的线性回归分析。

结果

734例患者疑似感染;449例在常规时间入院,287例在非工作时间入院。无论入院时间如何,单纯感染和脓毒症患者24小时总液体量的均值(95%CI)相等:单纯感染常规时间:3640(3410 - 3871)ml,非工作时间:3681(3451 - 3913)ml。脓毒症常规时间:3671(3443;3898)ml,非工作时间:3896(3542;4250)ml。非工作时间入院的单纯感染和脓毒症患者0 - 6小时的口服液体量低于常规时间入院患者。脓毒症患者非工作时间入院时0 - 6小时接受的静脉注射液体量多于常规时间入院患者。单纯感染或脓毒症患者的入院时间与0 - 24小时口服或静脉注射液体量之间无关联。

结论

入院时间与24小时总液体量无关。非工作时间入院的脓毒症患者比常规时间入院的患者0 - 6小时接受的静脉注射液体量更多,并且非工作时间入院的单纯感染和脓毒症患者0 - 6小时的口服液体量少于常规时间入院患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b018/10008217/d4f0a80458c3/aaem-11-e21-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验