• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Ecogeography of group size suggests differences in drivers of sociality among cooperatively breeding fairywrens.群体大小的生态地理学表明,合作繁殖的仙鹟在社会性驱动因素方面存在差异。
Proc Biol Sci. 2023 Mar 29;290(1995):20222397. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2022.2397. Epub 2023 Mar 15.
2
Resolving the Paradox of Environmental Quality and Sociality: The Ecological Causes and Consequences of Cooperative Breeding in Two Lineages of Birds.解决环境质量与社会性之间的悖论:两种鸟类合作繁殖的生态原因和后果。
Am Nat. 2019 Aug;194(2):207-216. doi: 10.1086/704090. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
3
The ecology of cooperative breeding behaviour.合作繁殖行为的生态学
Ecol Lett. 2017 Jun;20(6):708-720. doi: 10.1111/ele.12774. Epub 2017 May 7.
4
Context-dependent social benefits drive cooperative predator defense in a bird.情境依赖的社会益处推动鸟类的合作捕食防御。
Curr Biol. 2021 Sep 27;31(18):4120-4126.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.06.070. Epub 2021 Jul 23.
5
Ecological and demographic correlates of helping behaviour in a cooperatively breeding bird.一种合作繁殖鸟类中帮助行为的生态和人口统计学关联因素
J Anim Ecol. 2013 Mar;82(2):486-94. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12017. Epub 2013 Jan 24.
6
Plasticity in social behaviour varies with reproductive status in an avian cooperative breeder.鸟类合作繁殖者的社会行为可塑性随繁殖状态而变化。
Proc Biol Sci. 2022 May 11;289(1974):20220355. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2022.0355. Epub 2022 May 4.
7
Individual dispersal delays in a cooperative breeder: Ecological constraints, the benefits of philopatry and the social queue for dominance.个体在合作繁殖者中的扩散延迟:生态约束、恋家优势的好处和社会等级队列。
J Anim Ecol. 2018 Sep;87(5):1227-1238. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12814. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
8
Environmental quality mediates the ecological dominance of cooperatively breeding birds.环境质量调节了具有合作繁殖行为的鸟类的生态优势。
Ecol Lett. 2023 Jul;26(7):1145-1156. doi: 10.1111/ele.14226. Epub 2023 May 1.
9
Spatiotemporal environmental variation, risk aversion, and the evolution of cooperative breeding as a bet-hedging strategy.时空环境变化、风险规避与作为避险策略的合作繁殖的进化。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jun 28;108 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):10816-22. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1100303108. Epub 2011 Jun 20.
10
Population level consequences of facultatively cooperative behaviour in a stochastic environment.在随机环境中,具有合作行为的种群的群体水平后果。
J Anim Ecol. 2022 Jan;91(1):224-240. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13618. Epub 2021 Nov 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Climate fluctuations influence variation in group size in a cooperative bird.气候波动影响合作鸟类群体大小的变化。
Curr Biol. 2022 Oct 10;32(19):4264-4269.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2022.07.057. Epub 2022 Aug 22.
2
The evolution of cooperative breeding by direct and indirect fitness effects.通过直接和间接适合度效应实现的合作繁殖的进化。
Sci Adv. 2022 May 27;8(21):eabl7853. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abl7853.
3
Should I use fixed effects or random effects when I have fewer than five levels of a grouping factor in a mixed-effects model?在混合效应模型中,如果分组因素有少于 5 个水平,我应该使用固定效应还是随机效应?
PeerJ. 2022 Jan 20;10:e12794. doi: 10.7717/peerj.12794. eCollection 2022.
4
Meerkat helpers buffer the detrimental effects of adverse environmental conditions on fecundity, growth and survival.高跷羚助手缓冲了不利环境条件对繁殖力、生长和存活的不利影响。
J Anim Ecol. 2021 Mar;90(3):641-652. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13396. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
5
Survival Benefits of Group Living in a Fluctuating Environment.群体生活在波动环境中的生存获益。
Am Nat. 2020 Jun;195(6):1027-1036. doi: 10.1086/708496. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
6
When to start and when to stop: Effects of climate on breeding in a multi-brooded songbird.何时开始,何时结束:气候对多窝繁殖鸣禽繁殖的影响。
Glob Chang Biol. 2020 Feb;26(2):443-457. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14831. Epub 2019 Oct 3.
7
Rapid plastic breeding response to rain matches peak prey abundance in a tropical savanna bird.快速的繁殖对策对降雨的反应与热带稀树草原鸟类的猎物丰度峰值相匹配。
J Anim Ecol. 2019 Nov;88(11):1799-1811. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13068. Epub 2019 Aug 12.
8
Resolving the Paradox of Environmental Quality and Sociality: The Ecological Causes and Consequences of Cooperative Breeding in Two Lineages of Birds.解决环境质量与社会性之间的悖论:两种鸟类合作繁殖的生态原因和后果。
Am Nat. 2019 Aug;194(2):207-216. doi: 10.1086/704090. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
9
Individual dispersal delays in a cooperative breeder: Ecological constraints, the benefits of philopatry and the social queue for dominance.个体在合作繁殖者中的扩散延迟:生态约束、恋家优势的好处和社会等级队列。
J Anim Ecol. 2018 Sep;87(5):1227-1238. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12814. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
10
What drives cooperative breeding?是什么驱动了合作繁殖?
PLoS Biol. 2017 Jun 23;15(6):e2002965. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2002965. eCollection 2017 Jun.

群体大小的生态地理学表明,合作繁殖的仙鹟在社会性驱动因素方面存在差异。

Ecogeography of group size suggests differences in drivers of sociality among cooperatively breeding fairywrens.

机构信息

School of Biological Sciences, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA.

Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA.

出版信息

Proc Biol Sci. 2023 Mar 29;290(1995):20222397. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2022.2397. Epub 2023 Mar 15.

DOI:10.1098/rspb.2022.2397
PMID:36919434
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10015324/
Abstract

Cooperatively breeding species exhibit a range of social behaviours associated with different costs and benefits to group living, often in association with different environmental conditions. For example, recent phylogenetic studies have collectively shown that the evolution and distribution of cooperative breeding behaviour is related to the environment. However, little is known about how environmental variation may drive differences in social systems across populations within species, and how the relationship between environmental conditions and sociality may differ across species. Here, we examine variation in social group size along a steep environmental gradient for two congeneric cooperatively breeding species of fairywrens (Maluridae) and show that they exhibit opposing ecogeographic patterns. Purple-backed fairywrens, a species in which helpers increase group productivity, have larger groups in hot, dry environments and smaller groups in cool, wet environments. By contrast, superb fairywrens, a species with helpers that do not increase group productivity despite the presence of alloparental care, exhibit the opposite trend. We suggest differences in the costs and benefits of sociality contribute to these opposing ecogeographical patterns and demonstrate that comparisons of intraspecific patterns of social variation across species can provide insight into how ecology shapes social systems.

摘要

共生繁殖物种表现出一系列与群体生活相关的社会行为,这些行为通常与不同的环境条件有关,具有不同的成本和收益。例如,最近的系统发育研究表明,共生繁殖行为的进化和分布与环境有关。然而,对于环境变化如何驱动物种内不同种群的社会系统差异,以及环境条件和社会性之间的关系如何在不同物种中有所不同,我们知之甚少。在这里,我们研究了两种共生繁殖的仙女鹟(Maluridae)在陡峭的环境梯度上的社会群体大小的变化,并表明它们表现出相反的生态地理模式。紫背仙鹟,一种帮助者增加群体生产力的物种,在炎热干燥的环境中群体较大,在凉爽潮湿的环境中群体较小。相比之下,尽管存在亲代照顾,但helper 没有增加群体生产力的超级仙鹟表现出相反的趋势。我们认为,社会性的成本和收益的差异导致了这些相反的生态地理模式,并表明对物种间社会变异的种内模式的比较可以深入了解生态学如何塑造社会系统。