Hong Sung-Yup, Lee Seung-Jin, Hahm Hee-Bum, Chang Ji-Woo, Hyun Yoon-Suk
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Clin Shoulder Elb. 2023 Mar;26(1):71-81. doi: 10.5397/cise.2022.01382. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
This study evaluated the clinical and radiologic outcomes of onlay patch augmentation in rotator cuff repair for moderate-to-large tears in elderly patients.
We reviewed 24 patients who underwent onlay augmentation with dermal allograft after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair from January 2017 to March 2020. Inclusion criteria were patients aged >65 years with tears >2.5 cm, who were followed for >12 months after surgery, and patients who could raise their arms above 90° preoperatively. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Constant-Murley score, pain visual analog scale (VAS), and VAS for satisfaction were used as clinical outcomes. For the evaluation of cuff integrity, magnetic resonance imaging scans were performed every 3 months after surgery. The results were compared before and after surgery in all patients and between the retear and intact groups.
The average follow-up period was 16.38 months, and the mean age of patients was 71.05 years. All patients showed significant improvement in ASES score, Constant-Murley score, and pain VAS at the last evaluation. The average value of satisfaction VAS was 7.27/10. The retear rate was 25% (6/24) if Sugaya type 3 was categorized in the retear group, otherwise 16.7% (4/24), if Sugaya type 3 was categorized into the intact group. Irrespective of Sugaya type 3 being included in the retear group, there was no significant difference in outcome variables between the intact and retear groups during follow-up.
In moderate-to-large rotator cuff tear in elderly patients, onlay patch augmentation improved clinical outcomes. Retear did not adversely affect clinical outcomes.
本研究评估了老年患者中、大型肩袖撕裂修补术中使用补片增强的临床和影像学结果。
我们回顾了2017年1月至2020年3月期间接受关节镜下肩袖修补术后使用同种异体真皮补片增强的24例患者。纳入标准为年龄>65岁、撕裂>2.5 cm、术后随访>12个月且术前能将手臂举过90°的患者。采用美国肩肘外科医师(ASES)评分、Constant-Murley评分、疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)和满意度VAS作为临床结果指标。为评估肩袖完整性,术后每3个月进行磁共振成像扫描。比较所有患者手术前后以及再撕裂组和未撕裂组的结果。
平均随访期为16.38个月,患者平均年龄为7(1.05)岁。在最后一次评估时,所有患者的ASES评分、Constant-Murley评分和疼痛VAS均有显著改善。满意度VAS的平均值为7.27/10。如果将Sugaya 3型归类为再撕裂组,再撕裂率为25%(6/24);否则,如果将Sugaya 3型归类为未撕裂组,再撕裂率为16.7%(4/24)。无论Sugaya 3型是否包含在再撕裂组中,随访期间未撕裂组和再撕裂组的结局变量均无显著差异。
在老年患者中、大型肩袖撕裂中,补片增强改善了临床结果。再撕裂并未对临床结果产生不利影响。