Science Department, Unmind Ltd, London, UK.
School of Psychology,University of Sussex, East Sussex, UK.
Sleep. 2023 Jul 11;46(7). doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsad053.
Many adults without a diagnosed sleep disorder report poor sleep. Recently, there has been a dramatic increase in the use of app-based audio tools to aid sleep by the general public, yet there is a paucity of evidence on whether such tools are efficacious. This study evaluated the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of two categories of audio tools, comprising music and narrated stories, featured on the Unmind app.
We conducted an online, parallel, multi-arm, external pilot randomized controlled trial, with two intervention arms and a waitlist (WL) control group. Participants were working adults who were screened for poor sleep. Feasibility was assessed via objective and self-report measures. Preliminary efficacy was evaluated via self-report measures of sleep disturbance, work productivity, and other mental health outcomes, captured at baseline (t0) and following a 4-week intervention period (t1), and analyzed using mixed effects models with intention-to-treat principles.
Three hundred participants were randomized, and 92% were retained at t1. 90.5% of participants completed at least one intervention session. 82.1% reported being "satisfied" or "very satisfied" with their intervention, and 84.3% rated their intervention as "good" or "excellent." The between-group Hedges' g effect size for sleep disturbance was 0.92 [0.63-1.22] and 1.09 [0.80-1.39] for the two interventions compared to the WL group.
Both interventions are feasible and acceptable. Preliminary efficacy findings suggest that audio tools designed to aid sleep could have widespread financial and public health implications, and should be investigated in a definitive trial.
International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN), 12614821, http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN12614821.
许多没有被诊断出睡眠障碍的成年人都报告睡眠质量差。最近,公众越来越多地使用基于应用程序的音频工具来辅助睡眠,但这些工具是否有效却缺乏证据。本研究评估了 Unmind 应用程序上的两类音频工具(音乐和有声读物)的可行性和初步疗效。
我们进行了一项在线、平行、多臂、外部先导随机对照试验,包括两个干预组和一个等待名单(WL)对照组。参与者是被筛选出睡眠质量差的在职成年人。通过客观和自我报告的措施评估可行性。通过自我报告的睡眠障碍、工作效率和其他心理健康结果的措施评估初步疗效,在基线(t0)和 4 周干预期(t1)后进行评估,并使用混合效应模型和意向治疗原则进行分析。
300 名参与者被随机分配,92%在 t1 时保留。90.5%的参与者完成了至少一次干预。82.1%的人报告对他们的干预“满意”或“非常满意”,84.3%的人将他们的干预评为“好”或“优秀”。与 WL 组相比,两种干预措施的睡眠障碍的组间 Hedges' g 效应大小分别为 0.92[0.63-1.22]和 1.09[0.80-1.39]。
两种干预措施都是可行和可接受的。初步疗效发现表明,设计用于辅助睡眠的音频工具可能具有广泛的财务和公共卫生意义,应该在一项确定的试验中进行研究。
国际标准随机对照试验编号(ISRCTN),12614821,http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN12614821。