Cass Nathan D, Lindquist Nathan R, Bennett Marc L, Haynes David S
The Otology Group of Vanderbilt, Department of Otolaryngology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, U.S.A.
Laryngoscope. 2023 Apr;133(4):933-937. doi: 10.1002/lary.30323. Epub 2022 Aug 3.
To evaluate safety of monopolar electrosurgery (MES) in patients with cochlear implants (CIs) by reporting outcomes of a series of patients who underwent MES after CI.
Retrospective case series.
Tertiary referral center.
Patients with indwelling CI subsequently undergoing surgery with operative note specifically detailing MES use.
Adverse outcomes in post-operative audiology/otolaryngology documentation; speech recognition scores.
Thirty-five patients (10 with bilateral CI) experienced 63 unique MES exposure events, 85.7% below and 14.3% above the clavicle. No adverse events or decreased performance due to MES use were reported for any patient. Pre- and immediate postoperative speech recognition scores were not significantly different for patients using either consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC; n = 23, 68%-66%, p = 0.80) or AzBio (n = 15, 82%-88%, p = 0.60). For individual CNC performance, 21 (91%) patients demonstrated stability, 1 improved >15%, and 1 declined >15%, although this patient had become a non-user due to magnet issues and, after resolution of these issues, exceeded baseline pre-operative score. For individual AzBio performance, 12 (80%) patients demonstrated stability, 3 improved >15%, and none declined >15%.
No adverse events resulted from MES use in CI patients. Given the increased prevalence and expansion of indications for CIs, and widespread utility of MES, we suggest clarification and improved guidance from device manufacturers regarding safety and use of MES for patients with these devices. We hope that data regarding electrosurgery exposure events will better inform clinician decision-making with regards to relative benefits and risks for MES use for CI patients.
4 Laryngoscope, 133:933-937, 2023.
通过报告一系列在植入人工耳蜗(CI)后接受单极电外科手术(MES)的患者的结果,评估MES在CI患者中的安全性。
回顾性病例系列研究。
三级转诊中心。
植入CI且随后接受手术的患者,手术记录中详细记录了MES的使用情况。
术后听力学/耳鼻喉科记录中的不良结局;言语识别分数。
35例患者(10例为双侧CI)经历了63次独特的MES暴露事件,85.7%在锁骨以下,14.3%在锁骨以上。未报告任何患者因使用MES出现不良事件或性能下降。使用辅音-元音-辅音(CNC;n = 23,68% - 66%,p = 0.80)或AzBio(n = 15,82% - 88%,p = 0.60)的患者术前和术后即刻的言语识别分数无显著差异。对于个体CNC性能,21例(91%)患者表现稳定,1例改善>15%,1例下降>15%,尽管该患者因磁铁问题已不再使用CI,在这些问题解决后,其分数超过了术前基线水平。对于个体AzBio性能,12例(80%)患者表现稳定,3例改善>15%,无1例下降>15%。
CI患者使用MES未导致不良事件。鉴于CI的患病率增加、适应证扩大以及MES的广泛应用,我们建议设备制造商就这些设备患者使用MES的安全性和使用方法进行明确并提供更好的指导。我们希望关于电外科暴露事件的数据能更好地为临床医生在CI患者使用MES的相对益处和风险方面的决策提供参考。
4 《喉镜》,2023年,第133卷,第933 - 937页