Suppr超能文献

HiRes Ultra 系列召回:故障率和修复后语音识别结果。

HiRes Ultra Series Recall: Failure Rates and Revision Speech Recognition Outcomes.

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

Department of Hearing and Speech Science, Vanderbilt Bill Wilkerson Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.

出版信息

Otol Neurotol. 2022 Aug 1;43(7):e738-e745. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003598.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To report Advanced Bionics (AB) Ultra (V1) and Ultra 3D (V1) cochlear implant (CI) electrode failures and revision speech recognition outcomes for patients at a large CI program.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

Patients receiving Ultra (V1) or Ultra 3D (V1) devices as of September 21, 2021.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Failure rate, revision surgery, speech recognition scores.

RESULTS

To data, 65 (21.1%) of the 308 implanted devices are known failures, with 63 (20.5%) associated with the recent voluntary field corrective action (FCA). Average time to failure was 2.2 ± 1.1 years. Fifty-two patients (82.5%) elected for revision surgery. Among adults, immediate prerevision scores demonstrated a significant decrease from best-achieved scores with the faulty implant, with mean difference of -15.2% (p = 0.0115) for consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) and -27.3% (p < 0.0001) for AzBio in quiet. By 3 months postactivation of the revised device, CNC (p = 0.9766) and AzBio in quiet (p = 0.9501) scores were not significantly different than best prerevision scores. Overall, 15 of 19 patients regained or improved their best prerevision CNC score. The current trajectory for FCA device failures is approximately 6% per year.

CONCLUSION

Compared to manufacturer reporting, a high number of patients experienced hard failures of the Ultra (V1) and Ultra 3D (V1) devices. Early identification of failures is possibly because of the diligent use of electrical field imaging testing. Most patients affected by the FCA regain or exceed their prefailure speech recognition score as soon as 3 months after revision surgery.

摘要

目的

报告在一个大型人工耳蜗植入(CI)项目中,患者使用先进仿生公司(AB)Ultra(V1)和 Ultra 3D(V1)耳蜗植入电极的失败情况和修正后的言语识别结果。

研究设计

回顾性病例系列研究。

设置

三级转诊中心。

患者

截至 2021 年 9 月 21 日,接受 Ultra(V1)或 Ultra 3D(V1)设备的患者。

主要观察指标

失败率、修正手术、言语识别评分。

结果

截至目前,308 例植入设备中已知有 65 例(21.1%)出现故障,其中 63 例(20.5%)与最近的自愿现场纠正行动(FCA)有关。平均故障时间为 2.2±1.1 年。52 例患者(82.5%)选择进行修正手术。在成年人中,与有故障植入物的最佳表现相比,即刻修正前评分显著下降,差异均值为-15.2%(p=0.0115)用于辅音-核-辅音(CNC),-27.3%(p<0.0001)用于安静时的 AzBio。在修正设备激活后 3 个月,CNC(p=0.9766)和安静时的 AzBio(p=0.9501)评分与最佳修正前评分无显著差异。总体而言,19 例患者中有 15 例恢复或提高了最佳修正前 CNC 评分。目前 FCA 设备故障的轨迹约为每年 6%。

结论

与制造商报告相比,大量患者经历了 Ultra(V1)和 Ultra 3D(V1)设备的严重故障。故障的早期识别可能是因为 diligent 使用了电场成像测试。大多数受 FCA 影响的患者在修正手术后 3 个月内即可恢复或超过修正前的言语识别评分。

相似文献

1
HiRes Ultra Series Recall: Failure Rates and Revision Speech Recognition Outcomes.
Otol Neurotol. 2022 Aug 1;43(7):e738-e745. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003598.
2
Pediatric Failure Rates and Speech Outcomes in the HiRes Ultra and Ultra 3D Series Recall.
Otol Neurotol. 2024 Oct 1;45(9):1012-1015. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000004295. Epub 2024 Aug 27.
3
Failure in HiRes Ultra Series Recall Devices Does Not Necessarily Lead to Decrement in Performance.
Otol Neurotol. 2024 Jul 1;45(6):651-655. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000004212.
4
Voluntary Field Recall of Advanced Bionics HiRes Cochlear Implants: A Single-Institution Experience.
Otol Neurotol. 2022 Dec 1;43(10):e1094-e1099. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003711. Epub 2022 Oct 6.
5
HiRes ultra series cochlear implant field recall: failure rates and early outcomes.
Cochlear Implants Int. 2023 Mar;24(2):87-94. doi: 10.1080/14670100.2022.2145689. Epub 2022 Nov 21.
6
Impedance Change as an Indicator of Cochlear Implant Failure.
Otol Neurotol. 2023 Apr 1;44(4):e211-e215. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003819. Epub 2023 Feb 10.
7
Speech Recognition Performance Differences Between Precurved and Straight Electrode Arrays From a Single Manufacturer.
Otol Neurotol. 2022 Dec 1;43(10):1149-1154. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003703. Epub 2022 Oct 6.
8
Investigating the Minimal Clinically Important Difference for AzBio and CNC Speech Recognition Scores.
Otol Neurotol. 2024 Oct 1;45(9):e639-e643. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000004319.
9
Association of Self-Reported Coping Strategies With Speech Recognition Outcomes in Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
Otol Neurotol. 2022 Sep 1;43(8):e888-e894. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003621.
10
Assessment of Speech Understanding After Cochlear Implantation in Adult Hearing Aid Users: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Oct 1;146(10):916-924. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2020.1584.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Speech Recognition and Hearing Preservation Outcomes Between the Mid-Scala and Lateral Wall Electrode Arrays.
Otol Neurotol. 2024 Jan 1;45(1):52-57. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000004064. Epub 2023 Nov 22.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验