• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

初级保健中医疗服务提供者连续性的评估:实际连续性与随机连续性及潜在连续性

Evaluation of provider continuity in primary care: actual versus random and potential continuity.

作者信息

Mattsson L G, Westman G

机构信息

Department of Mathematics, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Fam Pract. 1987 Dec;4(4):251-9. doi: 10.1093/fampra/4.4.251.

DOI:10.1093/fampra/4.4.251
PMID:3692034
Abstract

Continuity of care is an important factor in the quality of primary care. Unfortunately there is no common view about its definition, measurement, determinants or relationship to outcome. Using a visit-based approach to the measurement of continuity, the present study examines the effects of organizational changes, including the introduction of a new appointment system, on physician continuity at a Swedish primary health care centre. This allows the concepts of random and potential continuity to be introduced, providing norms against which the achieved levels of actual continuity can be rated. The results show that the actual physician continuity, although not particularly high, was considerably higher than what could be expected according to chance alone (random continuity). Moreover, actual continuity did appear to increase after the organizational changes were implemented--absolutely as well as in relation to potential continuity. The importance of reducing the mobility of physicians is emphasized in order to further improve the situation.

摘要

连续性医疗是初级医疗质量的一个重要因素。不幸的是,对于其定义、测量方法、决定因素或与结果的关系,并没有统一的看法。本研究采用基于就诊的方法来衡量连续性,考察了包括引入新预约系统在内的组织变革对瑞典一家初级医疗中心医生连续性的影响。这使得随机连续性和潜在连续性的概念得以引入,从而提供了可用于评估实际连续性达成水平的标准。结果表明,实际的医生连续性虽然不是特别高,但大大高于仅根据概率所预期的水平(随机连续性)。此外,在实施组织变革后,实际连续性确实出现了增加——无论是绝对水平还是相对于潜在连续性而言。为了进一步改善这种情况,强调了减少医生流动的重要性。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of provider continuity in primary care: actual versus random and potential continuity.初级保健中医疗服务提供者连续性的评估:实际连续性与随机连续性及潜在连续性
Fam Pract. 1987 Dec;4(4):251-9. doi: 10.1093/fampra/4.4.251.
2
The effects of primary care physician visit continuity on patients' experiences with care.基层医疗医生诊疗连续性对患者就医体验的影响。
J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Jun;22(6):787-93. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0182-8. Epub 2007 Apr 13.
3
Continuity of care during pregnancy: the effect of provider continuity on outcome.孕期的连续性照护:提供者连续性对结局的影响。
J Fam Pract. 1985 Nov;21(5):375-80.
4
Decreased continuity in a residency clinic: a consequence of open access scheduling.住院医师门诊连续性降低:开放预约排班的结果。
Fam Med. 2009 Jan;41(1):46-50.
5
Improving clinical access and continuity through physician panel redesign.通过医生小组重新设计来改善临床服务的可及性和连续性。
J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Oct;25(10):1109-15. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1417-7. Epub 2010 Jun 12.
6
Continuity of care indices under an urn model.瓮模型下的连续护理指数
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 1985;33(6):417-24.
7
Waiting room time in the assessment of an appointment system in primary care.
Scand J Prim Health Care. 1987 Feb;5(1):35-40. doi: 10.3109/02813438709024184.
8
Continuity-of-care measures. An analytic and empirical comparison.
Med Care. 1984 Mar;22(3):231-9. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198403000-00006.
9
Association between continuity and access in primary care: a retrospective cohort study.基层医疗中连续性与可及性之间的关联:一项回顾性队列研究。
CMAJ Open. 2020 Nov 16;8(4):E722-E730. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20200014. Print 2020 Oct-Dec.
10
[Continuity of care-measurement and evaluation].[连续性照护——测量与评估]
Lakartidningen. 1980 Apr 23;77(17):1624-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Using an integrated COC index and multilevel measurements to verify the care outcome of patients with multiple chronic conditions.采用综合 COC 指数和多层次测量方法来验证患有多种慢性病患者的护理结果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Nov 19;12:405. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-405.
2
Quality assessment or quality control?
J R Coll Gen Pract. 1989 Nov;39(328):477.