Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, İstanbul Medipol University, TEM Avrupa Otoyolu Göztepe çıkışı no:1, 34214, Bağcılar-Istanbul, Turkey.
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Gazi University, Emek-Ankara, Turkey.
Oral Radiol. 2023 Oct;39(4):646-653. doi: 10.1007/s11282-023-00679-6. Epub 2023 Mar 15.
The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare the radiopacity of 20 current dental resin composites with digital radiography.
Ten specimens, 10-mm in diameter and 1-mm thickness, were prepared and radiographed using phosphor plates close to Al step wedges and tooth sections. The mean grey values (MGVs) were measured using an ImageJ software program and converted to equivalent Al thickness. Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tamhane post hoc test (p < 0.05). Correlation between mean radiopacity and filler content (wt% and vol%) of the tested materials was analyzed with linear regression analysis.
The radiopacity of all composites ranged from 1.32 mm Al (Estellite Flow Quick) to 3.41 mm Al (Charisma Classic). All the tested materials, except four restorative materials, had a radiopacity equal or higher than the enamel (p < 0.05). Linear regression revealed low correlation between the radiopacity and filler content of the composite.
Majority of the materials has appropriate radiopacity for dental restorations. There was great variation in radiopacity level, may clinically affect the diagnosis.
本研究旨在评估和比较 20 种当前牙科树脂复合材料的射线可检测性,并与数字化射线照相进行比较。
制备了 10 个直径为 10mm、厚度为 1mm 的样本,并使用接近 Al 阶跃楔和牙齿切片的磷光板进行射线照相。使用 ImageJ 软件程序测量平均灰度值(MGV),并将其转换为等效 Al 厚度。使用单向方差分析(ANOVA)和 Tamhane 事后检验(p<0.05)对数据进行分析。使用线性回归分析分析测试材料的平均射线不透明度与填料含量(wt%和 vol%)之间的相关性。
所有复合材料的射线不透明度范围从 1.32mm Al(Estellite Flow Quick)到 3.41mm Al(Charisma Classic)。除了四种修复材料外,所有测试材料的射线不透明度均等于或高于牙釉质(p<0.05)。线性回归显示,复合材料的射线不透明度与填料含量之间相关性较低。
大多数材料具有适合牙科修复的射线不透明度。射线不透明度水平存在很大差异,可能会对临床诊断产生影响。