Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Clin Ther. 2023 Mar;45(3):198-209. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2023.01.010. Epub 2023 Mar 14.
Rifaximin is indicated for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea (IBS-D) in adults. The current aim was to evaluate rifaximin efficacy on individual and composite IBS-D symptoms using definitions not previously examined.
Phase III post hoc analyses of two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials and the open-label phase of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial were conducted. Adults with IBS-D received a 2-week course of rifaximin 550 mg TID. Individual and composite responses for abdominal pain (mean weekly improvements from baseline of ≥30%, ≥40%, or ≥50%), bloating (mean weekly improvements from baseline of ≥1 or ≥2 points; or ≥30%, ≥40%, or ≥50%), stool consistency (mean weekly average stool consistency score <3 or <4), and urgency (improvement from baseline of ≥30% or ≥40% in percentage of days with urgency) for ≥2 of the first 4 weeks after treatment, and weekly for 12 weeks, were assessed.
Overall, 1258 patients from the double-blind trials (rifaximin [n = 624]; placebo [n = 634]) and 2438 from an open-label trial were analyzed. The percentage of bloating or urgency responders was significantly greater with double-blind rifaximin versus placebo (P ≤ 0.03). A significantly greater percentage of the double-blind group were composite abdominal pain and bloating responders versus placebo for all thresholds analyzed (P < 0.05). A significantly greater percentage of the double-blind group were tri-symptom composite end point responders (abdominal pain, bloating, and fecal urgency) versus placebo (P = 0.001). A significantly greater percentage of patients achieved response (≥30% composite tri-symptom threshold) with double-blind rifaximin versus placebo as early as 1 week posttreatment, with significance maintained through ≥5 weeks after treatment. Open-label results were consistent with those of the double-blind study.
Rifaximin significantly improved multiple, concurrent IBS-D symptoms, using clinically relevant definitions of treatment response. Using a novel tri-symptom composite end point (ie, abdominal pain, bloating, fecal urgency), adults with IBS-D treated with a 2-week course of rifaximin were significantly more likely to be composite end point responders than those receiving placebo (≥30% or ≥40% threshold) for the three symptoms. Thus, rifaximin not only met current standard thresholds used for adjudication of responders in clinical trials but also achieved higher thresholds for many of these symptoms, suggesting potential for even more robust clinical improvements.
gov identifiers: NCT00731679, NCT00724126, and NCT01543178.
利福昔明用于治疗成人肠易激综合征腹泻型(IBS-D)。本研究旨在使用先前未检验过的定义评估利福昔明对 IBS-D 个体和综合症状的疗效。
对两项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验的 III 期事后分析和一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验的开放标签期进行了分析。IBS-D 成人接受为期 2 周的利福昔明 550mg tid 治疗。治疗后第 4 周的前 4 周内每周至少有 2 次,并且每周至少有 12 次评估腹痛(从基线改善的平均值每周≥30%、≥40%或≥50%)、腹胀(从基线改善的平均值每周≥1 或≥2 点;或≥30%、≥40%或≥50%)、大便稠度(每周平均大便稠度评分<3 或<4)和急迫性(治疗后每周急迫性改善≥30%或≥40%)的个体和综合应答。
总体而言,对两项双盲试验(利福昔明[ n =624];安慰剂[ n =634])的 1258 例患者和一项开放标签试验的 2438 例患者进行了分析。与安慰剂相比,双盲利福昔明治疗组的腹胀或急迫性应答者比例显著更高(P≤0.03)。在所有分析的阈值下,与安慰剂相比,双盲组中更多的患者为综合腹痛和腹胀应答者(P<0.05)。与安慰剂相比,双盲组中有更多的患者达到三联症状综合终点应答(腹痛、腹胀和粪便急迫性)(P=0.001)。双盲组中,使用≥30%的复合三联症状阈值,治疗后第 1 周就有更多的患者开始出现应答,并且在治疗后至少 5 周内一直保持应答(P<0.05)。开放标签结果与双盲研究一致。
利福昔明显著改善了多种并发 IBS-D 症状,使用了治疗应答的临床相关定义。使用一种新的三联症状综合终点(即腹痛、腹胀、粪便急迫性),与接受安慰剂治疗的患者相比(≥30%或≥40%阈值),接受为期 2 周利福昔明治疗的 IBS-D 成人更有可能成为综合终点应答者。因此,利福昔明不仅满足了临床试验中用于判定应答者的当前标准阈值,而且还达到了许多这些症状的更高阈值,这表明可能会有更显著的临床改善。
gov 标识符:NCT00731679、NCT00724126 和 NCT01543178。