• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

应用射频热融合技术和库欣连续缝合术行马空肠吻合术的体外评估。

Ex vivo evaluation of a technique for equine jejunocecal anastomosis using radiofrequency thermofusion and a Cushing oversew.

机构信息

Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

出版信息

Vet Surg. 2023 May;52(4):545-553. doi: 10.1111/vsu.13946. Epub 2023 Mar 15.

DOI:10.1111/vsu.13946
PMID:36922367
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe a technique for a side-to-side jejunocecal anastomosis in horses using radiofrequency thermofusion (TF) of the intestines supported by a Cushing oversew and to compare this anastomosis to handsewn and stapled techniques.

STUDY DESIGN

Ex vivo study.

SAMPLE POPULATION

Intestinal tracts from 24 slaughtered horses.

METHODS

A radiofrequency device was used to perform a jejunocecal anastomosis (Group RFA). The construction time and bursting pressure of this construct were compared with those of a hand-sewn double layer (Group HS) and stapled anastomoses (Group ST) without oversew of the staple line. Histology was also performed for the TF anastomoses to evaluate the extent of the thermal damage.

RESULTS

The median (range) construction time (min) for the TF (15.8 [14.4-16.8]) was not significantly different from that for the HS (25.5 [24.2-26.3]) and ST (10.8 [9.7-12.5]) groups (p = .07). The construction time for ST was shorter than that for HS group (p < .001). The average (standard deviation) bursting pressure (mmHg) for HS (153.1 +/- 17.5) was higher than that for RFA (76 +/- 15) and ST groups (48 +/- 13; p < .001). The bursting pressure of the RFA was higher than that of the ST anastomoses (p = .001). The thermal damage caused by the device was within the suture oversew in the deeper layers, whereas it extended a few mm beyond the suture line in the serosa.

CONCLUSION

Radiofrequency assisted anastomoses provide similar construction times to current techniques and have a higher bursting pressure than ST anastomoses.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Radiofrequency-assisted anastomoses with a suture oversew demonstrated comparable bursting pressures to ST anastomoses. The use of the radiofrequency device on the intestine is extra label and causes serosal tissue damage, which may increase the risk of adhesions.

摘要

目的

描述一种使用射频热融合(TF)对马的空肠回肠吻合术的技术,该技术通过库欣缝合线来支撑肠道,并将其与手工缝合和吻合器吻合技术进行比较。

研究设计

离体研究。

样本人群

24 头屠宰马的肠道。

方法

使用射频设备进行空肠回肠吻合术(RFA 组)。比较该构建的构建时间和爆破压力与手工双层(HS 组)和无吻合线库欣缝合线的吻合器吻合术(ST 组)的构建时间和爆破压力。还对 TF 吻合术进行了组织学检查,以评估热损伤的程度。

结果

TF 组(15.8[14.4-16.8])的中位数(范围)构建时间(min)与 HS 组(25.5[24.2-26.3])和 ST 组(10.8[9.7-12.5])差异无统计学意义(p=0.07)。ST 组的构建时间短于 HS 组(p<0.001)。HS 组(153.1+/-17.5)的平均(标准差)爆破压力(mmHg)高于 RFA 组(76+/-15)和 ST 组(48+/-13;p<0.001)。RFA 组的爆破压力高于 ST 吻合术组(p=0.001)。该设备引起的热损伤位于深层缝线缝合线上,而在浆膜层中则延伸到缝线几毫米之外。

结论

射频辅助吻合术与当前技术的构建时间相似,并且其爆破压力高于 ST 吻合术。带有缝线缝合线的射频辅助吻合术与 ST 吻合术具有相似的爆破压力。在肠道上使用射频设备是超说明书使用的,会造成浆膜组织损伤,这可能会增加粘连的风险。

相似文献

1
Ex vivo evaluation of a technique for equine jejunocecal anastomosis using radiofrequency thermofusion and a Cushing oversew.应用射频热融合技术和库欣连续缝合术行马空肠吻合术的体外评估。
Vet Surg. 2023 May;52(4):545-553. doi: 10.1111/vsu.13946. Epub 2023 Mar 15.
2
Comparison of hand-sewn and oversewn stapled jejunojejunal anastomoses in horses.马手工缝合与吻合器缝合空肠空肠吻合术的比较。
Can Vet J. 2018 Jan;59(1):67-73.
3
In vitro description of a new technique for stapled side-to-side jejunocecal anastomosis in horses and CT scan anatomical comparison with other techniques.马的吻合器侧侧空肠回肠吻合新技术的体外描述及与其他技术的CT扫描解剖学比较
BMC Vet Res. 2014;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S9. doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-10-S1-S9. Epub 2014 Jul 7.
4
Comparison of skin staples with sutures for anastomosis of the small intestine in dogs.犬小肠吻合术中皮肤钉合器与缝线的比较。
Vet Surg. 2000 Jul-Aug;29(4):293-302. doi: 10.1053/jvet.2000.7539.
5
Ex vivo comparison of three hand sewn end-to-end anastomoses in normal equine jejunum.正常马空肠三种手工端对端吻合术的体外比较。
Equine Vet J Suppl. 2011 Aug(39):76-80. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2011.00423.x.
6
Effect of three different needle holders on gastrointestinal anastomosis construction time and bursting pressure in equine jejunal segments.三种不同持针器对马空肠段胃肠吻合时间和爆破压力的影响。
BMC Vet Res. 2021 Apr 15;17(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s12917-021-02871-4.
7
Evaluation of suture reinforcement for stapled intestinal anastomoses: 77 dogs (2008-2018).吻合器肠道吻合术中缝线加固的评估:77只犬(2008 - 2018年)
Vet Surg. 2019 Oct;48(7):1188-1193. doi: 10.1111/vsu.13274. Epub 2019 Jul 4.
8
Bipolar radiofrequency-induced thermofusion of intestinal anastomoses--feasibility of a new anastomosis technique in porcine and rat colon.双极射频诱导肠吻合的热融合——一种新的猪和大鼠结肠吻合技术的可行性。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2011 Apr;396(4):529-33. doi: 10.1007/s00423-011-0756-0. Epub 2011 Feb 24.
9
Gastrointestinal thickness, duration, and leak pressure of five intestinal anastomosis techniques in cats.猫的五种肠吻合技术的胃肠道厚度、持续时间和泄漏压力。
Vet Surg. 2024 Feb;53(2):384-394. doi: 10.1111/vsu.14043. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
10
Ex vivo comparison of the biomechanical properties of hand-sewn and stapled jejunoileal anastomoses in horses.马的手工缝合与吻合器吻合空肠回肠吻合口生物力学特性的体外比较
Vet Surg. 2014 May;43(4):451-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2014.12188.x. Epub 2014 Apr 11.