Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Vet Surg. 2023 May;52(4):545-553. doi: 10.1111/vsu.13946. Epub 2023 Mar 15.
To describe a technique for a side-to-side jejunocecal anastomosis in horses using radiofrequency thermofusion (TF) of the intestines supported by a Cushing oversew and to compare this anastomosis to handsewn and stapled techniques.
Ex vivo study.
Intestinal tracts from 24 slaughtered horses.
A radiofrequency device was used to perform a jejunocecal anastomosis (Group RFA). The construction time and bursting pressure of this construct were compared with those of a hand-sewn double layer (Group HS) and stapled anastomoses (Group ST) without oversew of the staple line. Histology was also performed for the TF anastomoses to evaluate the extent of the thermal damage.
The median (range) construction time (min) for the TF (15.8 [14.4-16.8]) was not significantly different from that for the HS (25.5 [24.2-26.3]) and ST (10.8 [9.7-12.5]) groups (p = .07). The construction time for ST was shorter than that for HS group (p < .001). The average (standard deviation) bursting pressure (mmHg) for HS (153.1 +/- 17.5) was higher than that for RFA (76 +/- 15) and ST groups (48 +/- 13; p < .001). The bursting pressure of the RFA was higher than that of the ST anastomoses (p = .001). The thermal damage caused by the device was within the suture oversew in the deeper layers, whereas it extended a few mm beyond the suture line in the serosa.
Radiofrequency assisted anastomoses provide similar construction times to current techniques and have a higher bursting pressure than ST anastomoses.
Radiofrequency-assisted anastomoses with a suture oversew demonstrated comparable bursting pressures to ST anastomoses. The use of the radiofrequency device on the intestine is extra label and causes serosal tissue damage, which may increase the risk of adhesions.
描述一种使用射频热融合(TF)对马的空肠回肠吻合术的技术,该技术通过库欣缝合线来支撑肠道,并将其与手工缝合和吻合器吻合技术进行比较。
离体研究。
24 头屠宰马的肠道。
使用射频设备进行空肠回肠吻合术(RFA 组)。比较该构建的构建时间和爆破压力与手工双层(HS 组)和无吻合线库欣缝合线的吻合器吻合术(ST 组)的构建时间和爆破压力。还对 TF 吻合术进行了组织学检查,以评估热损伤的程度。
TF 组(15.8[14.4-16.8])的中位数(范围)构建时间(min)与 HS 组(25.5[24.2-26.3])和 ST 组(10.8[9.7-12.5])差异无统计学意义(p=0.07)。ST 组的构建时间短于 HS 组(p<0.001)。HS 组(153.1+/-17.5)的平均(标准差)爆破压力(mmHg)高于 RFA 组(76+/-15)和 ST 组(48+/-13;p<0.001)。RFA 组的爆破压力高于 ST 吻合术组(p=0.001)。该设备引起的热损伤位于深层缝线缝合线上,而在浆膜层中则延伸到缝线几毫米之外。
射频辅助吻合术与当前技术的构建时间相似,并且其爆破压力高于 ST 吻合术。带有缝线缝合线的射频辅助吻合术与 ST 吻合术具有相似的爆破压力。在肠道上使用射频设备是超说明书使用的,会造成浆膜组织损伤,这可能会增加粘连的风险。