School of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Nepean Blue Mountains Local Health District, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
J Clin Nurs. 2023 Sep;32(17-18):5693-5711. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16684. Epub 2023 Mar 15.
To critically synthesise the literature that explores the experiences of workplace gender discrimination from the perspective of registered nurses.
Integrative review.
Primary research articles reporting on the experience of workplace gender discrimination towards registered nurses in any setting were eligible for inclusion. Studies were critically appraised for methodological quality using a modified Critical Appraisal Skills Program list. The six phases of thematic analysis proposed by Braun and Clarke (2006) were used to guide the analysis. Data were extracted and coded, and themes were identified according to the review aims and significant findings of each study.
CINAHL, MEDLINE, SCOPUS, Cochrane Library, published between January 2012 and June 2022.
Twenty studies met the inclusion criteria. Major themes identified were (1) career progression, (2) career interruption, (3) positioning of men in nursing and (4) positioning of women in nursing.
This review shows that both men and women in nursing experience workplace gender discrimination; however, the forms and consequences of this discrimination differ substantially by gender.
It is important that the pursuit of greater numerical representation of men in nursing does not result in further reinforcing patriarchal advantage. Professional development for nurse leaders in managing gender issues is recommended.
This integrative review presents current issues on workplace gender discrimination for men and women in nursing. The findings suggest gender roles and norms have an effect on the careers of both men and women in nursing. The time has come to alter restrictive gender norms and to challenge notions of hegemonic masculinity and femininity.
We have adhered to relevant EQUATOR guidelines-PRISMA.
For this literature review on workplace gender discrimination for registered nurses, we did not engage members of the patient population, nor the general public.
批判性综合探索注册护士从职场性别歧视角度体验的文献。
综合评价。
符合条件的研究包括在任何环境下报告注册护士职场性别歧视经历的主要研究文章。使用修改后的批判性评价技能计划清单对方法质量进行批判性评价。使用 Braun 和 Clarke(2006 年)提出的主题分析的六个阶段来指导分析。根据审查目的和每项研究的重要发现提取和编码数据,并确定主题。
CINAHL、MEDLINE、SCOPUS、Cochrane 图书馆,发表时间为 2012 年 1 月至 2022 年 6 月。
符合纳入标准的研究有 20 项。确定的主要主题包括(1)职业发展,(2)职业中断,(3)男性在护理中的定位和(4)女性在护理中的定位。
这项综述表明,护理领域的男性和女性都经历了职场性别歧视;然而,这种歧视的形式和后果因性别而异。
重要的是,追求男性在护理中的人数增加不应导致进一步加强父权制优势。建议为护理领导者提供管理性别问题的专业发展。
这篇综合评价提出了当前护理领域男性和女性职场性别歧视的问题。研究结果表明,性别角色和规范对护理领域男女的职业发展都有影响。现在是时候改变限制性别规范,挑战霸权男性气质和女性气质的观念了。
我们遵守了相关的 EQUATOR 指南-PRISMA。
对于这篇关于注册护士职场性别歧视的文献综述,我们没有让患者群体或公众参与。