帕金森病残疾评估。临床评估与器械检查。

Evaluation of disability in Parkinson's disease. Clinical evaluation and instrumental tests.

作者信息

Junqué C, Peirò A, Tordesillas C, Grau-Veciana J M

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Sta. Creu i St. Pau Hospital, Autonomous University of Barcelona, School of Medicine, Spain.

出版信息

Funct Neurol. 1987 Jul-Sep;2(3):293-300.

PMID:3692273

Abstract

To investigate the relationship between instrumental and clinical tests and their validity for the evaluation of disability in Parkinson's disease, we studied 33 patients using three neuropsychological tests for speed and motor evaluation, as well as Yahr's Clinical and the Northwestern University Disability Scales for clinical purposes. Multiple regression analysis revealed that clinical measures explain 30% of disability variance and instrumental tests 34%, although without statistical significance. However, used simultaneously they may account for 98% (p less than 0.02). These results suggest that clinical and instrumental measures are complementary and should be used together in the evaluation of Parkinson's disease.

摘要

为了研究仪器测试与临床测试之间的关系及其在帕金森病残疾评估中的有效性，我们对33例患者进行了研究，使用了三项用于速度和运动评估的神经心理学测试，以及用于临床目的的雅尔临床分级和西北大学残疾量表。多元回归分析显示，临床测量解释了30%的残疾差异，仪器测试解释了34%，尽管无统计学意义。然而，同时使用时它们可能解释98%（P<0.02）。这些结果表明，临床和仪器测量是互补的，在帕金森病评估中应一起使用。