Artemis N, Karacostas D, Karoutas G, Milonas I, Logothetis J
B' Department of Neurology, Aristotelian University School of Medicine, Agios Dimitrios Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Funct Neurol. 1987 Jul-Sep;2(3):301-13.
Fifty-two patients with carotid transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) were subjected to subsequent compression of the common carotid and superficial temporal artery. An EEG recording was monitored simultaneously with plethysmograms from both supraorbital regions during the arterial compression period. All patients were angiographically classified as normal (Group A, n = 25) with less than 50% stenosis (Group B, n = 14) and with more than 50% stenosis (Group C, n = 13), according to the degree of internal carotid stenosis. The carotid compression test was positive in 6 (11%) of our 52 patients, corresponding to 1 (4%) patient from Group A, 1 (7%) from Group B and 4 (30%) from Group C. In contrast, supraorbital photoelectric plethysmography (SOPPL) yielded abnormal results in 17 (33%) of our 52 patients, corresponding to 3 (12%) patients from Group A, 4 (28%) from Group B and 10 (77%) from Group C. We conclude that in view of the false positive results (12%) obtained with the SOPPL technique, the clinician who interprets these findings should be careful and combine these tests with other tests, preferably hemodynamic, for a final decision about the patient's status.
52例颈动脉短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)患者随后接受了颈总动脉和颞浅动脉压迫。在动脉压迫期间,同时监测脑电图记录以及来自两个眶上区域的体积描记图。根据颈内动脉狭窄程度,所有患者经血管造影分类为正常(A组,n = 25)、狭窄小于50%(B组,n = 14)和狭窄大于50%(C组,n = 13)。在我们的52例患者中,6例(11%)颈动脉压迫试验呈阳性,分别对应A组1例(4%)、B组1例(7%)和C组4例(30%)。相比之下,眶上光电体积描记法(SOPPL)在我们的52例患者中有17例(33%)结果异常,分别对应A组3例(12%)、B组4例(28%)和C组10例(77%)。我们得出结论,鉴于SOPPL技术获得的假阳性结果(12%),解读这些结果的临床医生应谨慎,并将这些检查与其他检查(最好是血流动力学检查)相结合,以便对患者状况做出最终判断。