Longhurst Hilary J, Valerieva Anna
Department of Medicine, University of Auckland and Department of Immunology, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
Department of Allergology, Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria.
J Asthma Allergy. 2023 Mar 9;16:269-277. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S396338. eCollection 2023.
Through its fluctuating disease activity and unpredictable attacks, hereditary angioedema (HAE) imposes a substantial patient burden. To minimize HAE burden and improve quality of life, treatment should involve individualized management strategies that address on-demand therapy and short-term/long-term prophylaxis. Goals of long-term prophylaxis include reducing the number, severity, and burden of HAE attacks. The best characterized forms of HAE arise from deficiency or dysfunction of C1-inhibitor (C1-INH; types I/II), and C1-INH replacement therapy is a first-line intervention for on-demand (acute) treatment of HAE attacks, short-term prophylaxis before high-risk procedures, and long-term prophylaxis. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trials have shown dose-dependent efficacy with plasma-derived C1-INH (pdC1-INH) 40-60 IU/kg subcutaneously, pdC1-INH 1000 U intravenously, and recombinant human C1-INH (rhC1-INH) 50 IU/kg (maximum 4200 IU) intravenously, all administered twice weekly, as long-term prophylaxis in patients with a history of 2 to ≥4 attacks/month. Overall, up to 83% (pdC1-INH 60 IU/kg) of patients experienced an HAE attack reduction threshold of ≥70%, and up to 58% (pdC1-INH 60 IU/kg) achieved an attack reduction threshold of ≥90%. Lower-dose intravenous pdC1-INH therapy (1000 U) was seemingly less effective, with 45% of 22 patients experiencing an HAE attack reduction threshold of ≥70%, and up to 23% achieving an attack reduction threshold of ≥90%. Higher-dose intravenous rhC1-INH 50 IU/kg (maximum, 4200 IU) twice weekly was of intermediate benefit. Despite a baseline mean attack frequency of 17.9 (during the 3 months prior to study treatment) and a mean attack frequency during a 4-week placebo period of 7.2, 52% of 23 patients experienced ≥70% reduction in attack frequency and 26% of 23 patients experienced ≥90% reduction in attack frequency. The increasing patient percentages treated with C1-INH replacement therapy as long-term prophylaxis meeting these high thresholds reinforces hopes and expectations that "attack freedom" is achievable, including for those with moderate or severe disease.
遗传性血管性水肿(HAE)因其疾病活动波动和发作不可预测,给患者带来了沉重负担。为了将HAE负担降至最低并提高生活质量,治疗应采用个性化管理策略,包括按需治疗以及短期/长期预防。长期预防的目标包括减少HAE发作的次数、严重程度和负担。最典型的HAE形式是由C1抑制剂(C1-INH;I/II型)缺乏或功能障碍引起的,C1-INH替代疗法是HAE发作按需(急性)治疗、高风险手术前短期预防以及长期预防的一线干预措施。随机、双盲、安慰剂对照交叉试验表明,皮下注射40 - 60 IU/kg血浆源性C1-INH(pdC1-INH)、静脉注射1000 U pdC1-INH以及静脉注射50 IU/kg(最大4200 IU)重组人C1-INH(rhC1-INH)均具有剂量依赖性疗效,所有这些给药方案均为每周两次,用于有每月发作2至≥4次病史的患者进行长期预防。总体而言,高达83%(pdC1-INH 60 IU/kg)的患者发作减少阈值≥70%,高达58%(pdC1-INH 60 IU/kg)的患者发作减少阈值≥90%。较低剂量的静脉注射pdC1-INH疗法(1000 U)似乎效果较差,22名患者中有45%的发作减少阈值≥70%,高达23%的患者发作减少阈值≥90%。较高剂量的静脉注射rhC1-INH 50 IU/kg(最大,4200 IU)每周两次具有中等益处。尽管研究治疗前3个月的基线平均发作频率为17.9次,4周安慰剂期的平均发作频率为7.2次,但23名患者中有52%的发作频率降低≥70%,23名患者中有26%的发作频率降低≥90%。接受C1-INH替代疗法作为长期预防且达到这些高阈值的患者比例不断增加,增强了人们对实现“无发作”的希望和期望,包括对那些患有中度或重度疾病的患者。