Suppr超能文献

使用一次性或可重复使用输尿管镜的逆行性肾盂内手术:有区别吗?多中心FLEXOR研究的结果

RIRS with disposable or reusable scopes: does it make a difference? Results from the multicenter FLEXOR study.

作者信息

Gauhar Vineet, Chai Chu Ann, Chew Ben H, Singh Abhishek, Castellani Daniele, Tailly Thomas, Emiliani Esteban, Keat William Ong Lay, Ragoori Deepak, Lakmichi Mohamed Amine, Teoh Jeremy Yuen-Chun, Traxer Olivier, Somani Bhaskar Kumar

机构信息

Department of Urology, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Singapore.

Urology Unit, Department of Surgery, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

出版信息

Ther Adv Urol. 2023 Mar 11;15:17562872231158072. doi: 10.1177/17562872231158072. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

With several single-use ureteroscopes now available, our aim was to analyze and compare data obtained globally from high-volume centers using both disposable and reusable flexible ureteroscopes and see if indeed in real-world practice either scope has a distinct advantage.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis was performed on the FLEXOR registry, which was created as a TOWER group (Team of Worldwide Endourological Researchers, research wing of the Endourological Society) endeavor. Patients who underwent retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for renal stones from January 2018 to August 2021 were enrolled from 20 centers globally. A total of 6663 patients whose data were available for analysis were divided into Group 1 (Reusable scopes, 4808 patients) Group 2 (Disposable scopes, 1855 patients).

RESULTS

The age and gender distribution were similar in both groups. The mean stone size was 11.8 mm and 9.6 mm in Groups 2 and 1, respectively ( < 0.001). Group 2 had more patients with >2 cm stones, lower pole stones and of higher Hounsfield unit. Thulium fiber laser (TFL) was used more in Group 2 ( < 0.001). Patients in Group 2 had a slightly higher stone-free rate (SFR) (78.22%) and a lower number of residual fragments (RFs) compared with Group 1 ( < 0.001). The need for further treatments for RF and overall complications was comparable between groups. On multivariate analysis, overall complications were more likely to occur in elderly patients, larger stone size, lower pole stones, and were also more when using disposable scopes with longer operative time. RFs were significantly higher ( < 0.001) for lower pole, larger, harder, multiple stones and in elderly.

CONCLUSION

Our real-world practice observations suggest that urologists choose disposable scopes for bigger, lower pole, and harder stones, and it does indeed help in improving the single-stage SFR if used correctly, with the appropriate lasers and lasing techniques in expert hands.

摘要

引言

随着现在有几种一次性使用的输尿管镜可供使用,我们的目的是分析和比较全球高容量中心使用一次性和可重复使用的软性输尿管镜获得的数据,看看在实际临床实践中,这两种输尿管镜是否真的有明显优势。

方法

对FLEXOR注册研究进行回顾性分析,该研究是作为TOWER小组(全球腔内泌尿外科研究团队,腔内泌尿外科协会的研究部门)的一项工作开展的。2018年1月至2021年8月期间因肾结石接受逆行性肾内手术(RIRS)的患者来自全球20个中心。共有6663例可获得分析数据的患者被分为第1组(可重复使用输尿管镜组,4808例患者)和第2组(一次性使用输尿管镜组,1855例患者)。

结果

两组患者的年龄和性别分布相似。第2组和第1组的平均结石大小分别为11.8毫米和9.6毫米(<0.001)。第2组中结石大于2厘米、位于下极以及亨氏单位较高的患者更多。第2组更多使用铥光纤激光(TFL)(<0.001)。与第1组相比,第2组患者的无石率(SFR)略高(78.22%),残留碎片(RFs)数量更少(<0.001)。两组之间对RFs进行进一步治疗的需求和总体并发症相当。多因素分析显示,总体并发症更易发生于老年患者、结石较大、位于下极的情况,并且使用一次性输尿管镜且手术时间较长时并发症也更多。下极、较大、较硬、多发结石以及老年患者的RFs显著更高(<0.001)。

结论

我们在实际临床实践中的观察表明,泌尿外科医生会为更大、位于下极和更硬的结石选择一次性输尿管镜,并且如果由专家正确使用并结合适当的激光和激光技术,它确实有助于提高一期SFR。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

8
Guideline of the guidelines: urolithiasis.指南指南:尿石症。
Curr Opin Urol. 2021 Mar 1;31(2):125-129. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000855.
9
High pressure endoscopic irrigation: impact on renal histology.高压内镜冲洗:对肾组织学的影响。
Int Braz J Urol. 2021 Mar-Apr;47(2):350-356. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.0248.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验