Suppr超能文献

一次性使用软性输尿管镜:发展中国家的更新与展望。叙述性综述。

Single-use flexible ureteroscopes: update and perspective in developing countries. A narrative review.

机构信息

Seção de Endourologia, Divisão de Urologia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo - FMUSP, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.

Division of Urology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Int Braz J Urol. 2022 May-Jun;48(3):456-467. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2021.0475.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Flexible ureteroscopy is a well-established method for treatment of urinary stones but flexible ureteroscopes are expensive and fragile devices with a very limited lifetime. Since 2006 with the advent of digital flexible ureteroscopes a great evolution has occurred. The first single-use flexible ureteroscope was launched in 2011 and new models are coming to the market. The aim of this article is to review the characteristics of these devices, compare their results with the reusable devices and evaluate the cost-benefits of adopting single-use flexible ureteroscopes in developing countries.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

an extensive review of articles listed at PubMed and published between 2000 and 2021 was performed.

RESULTS

Single-use flexible ureteroscopes have a shaft with 65 to 68cm length and weight between 119 and 277g. Their deflection goes up to 300 degrees. Their stone-free rates vary between 60 and 95% which is comparable to reusable scopes and operative times ranges from 54 to 86 minutes which are lower when compared to reusable flexible scopes. Their costs vary between 800 and 3180 US dollars.

CONCLUSION

single-use flexible ureteroscopes are lighter and have superior quality of image when compared to fiberoptic ones. There are no definite data showing a higher stone-free rate or less complications with the use of single-use flexible ureteroscopes. Each institution must perform a cost-benefit analysis before making the decision of adopting or not such devices depending on the local circumstances.

摘要

未加标签

软性输尿管镜是治疗尿路结石的一种成熟方法,但软性输尿管镜是昂贵且易碎的设备,使用寿命非常有限。自 2006 年数字软性输尿管镜问世以来,发生了巨大的发展。第一款一次性使用软性输尿管镜于 2011 年推出,新的型号也不断推向市场。本文旨在回顾这些设备的特点,比较它们与可重复使用设备的结果,并评估在发展中国家采用一次性使用软性输尿管镜的成本效益。

材料与方法

对 2000 年至 2021 年在 PubMed 上列出的文章进行了广泛的回顾。

结果

一次性使用软性输尿管镜的镜体长度为 65 至 68cm,重量在 119 至 277g 之间。其弯曲度可达 300 度。其无石率在 60%至 95%之间,与可重复使用的输尿管镜相当,手术时间为 54 至 86 分钟,与可重复使用的软性输尿管镜相比有所降低。其成本在 800 至 3180 美元之间。

结论

与纤维输尿管镜相比,一次性使用软性输尿管镜更轻,图像质量更高。目前尚无明确的数据表明一次性使用软性输尿管镜具有更高的无石率或更少的并发症。每个机构都必须根据当地情况进行成本效益分析,然后再决定是否采用此类设备。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79cd/9060176/35710b7aa212/1677-6119-ibju-48-03-0456-gf01.jpg

相似文献

1
Single-use flexible ureteroscopes: update and perspective in developing countries. A narrative review.
Int Braz J Urol. 2022 May-Jun;48(3):456-467. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2021.0475.
2
Comparison of single-use flexible ureteroscopes with a reusable ureteroscope for the management of paediatric urolithiasis.
J Pediatr Urol. 2023 Jun;19(3):248.e1-248.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2023.01.009. Epub 2023 Jan 19.
6
Comparing outcomes of single-use vs reusable ureteroscopes: a systematic review and meta analysis.
Urolithiasis. 2024 Feb 28;52(1):37. doi: 10.1007/s00240-024-01537-8.
8
Current Disposable Ureteroscopes: Performance and Limitations in a Standardized Kidney Model.
J Endourol. 2020 Oct;34(10):1015-1020. doi: 10.1089/end.2020.0185. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
9
Evaluation of a Novel Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscope.
J Endourol. 2021 Jun;35(6):903-907. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0237. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
10
Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscopes: How Do They Compare with Reusable Ureteroscopes?
J Endourol. 2019 Feb;33(2):71-78. doi: 10.1089/end.2018.0785. Epub 2019 Feb 4.

引用本文的文献

3
Single-use flexible ureteroscopes: practice patterns, attitudes, and preferences for next-generation concepts.
Front Surg. 2024 Jul 4;11:1419682. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1419682. eCollection 2024.
6
Single use flexible ureteroscopes: Current status and future directions.
BJUI Compass. 2023 Jul 5;4(6):613-621. doi: 10.1002/bco2.265. eCollection 2023 Nov.
8
RIRS with disposable or reusable scopes: does it make a difference? Results from the multicenter FLEXOR study.
Ther Adv Urol. 2023 Mar 11;15:17562872231158072. doi: 10.1177/17562872231158072. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
10
Will the advances in retrograde intrarenal surgery extinguish percutaneous nephrolithotomy for stones larger than 2 cm?
Int Braz J Urol. 2023 Jan-Feb;49(1):143-149. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2022.0533.

本文引用的文献

2
Benchtop Assessment of a New Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscope.
J Endourol. 2021 Jun;35(6):755-760. doi: 10.1089/end.2020.0836. Epub 2020 Dec 22.
3
Cost comparison of single-use versus reusable flexible ureteroscope: A systematic review.
Turk J Urol. 2020 Nov;46(Supp. 1):S40-S45. doi: 10.5152/tud.2020.20223. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
4
Staghorn renal stones: what the urologist needs to know.
Int Braz J Urol. 2020 Nov-Dec;46(6):927-933. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.99.07.
6
Endoscopic treatment of lower pole stones: is a disposable ureteroscope preferable? Results of a prospective case-control study.
Cent European J Urol. 2019;72(3):280-284. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2019.1962. Epub 2019 Sep 16.
8
Single use versus reusable digital flexible ureteroscopes: A prospective comparative study.
Int J Urol. 2019 Oct;26(10):999-1005. doi: 10.1111/iju.14091. Epub 2019 Aug 25.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验