Yan Hongxia, He Fang, Wei Jianjian, Zhang Qiuxiang, Guo Chunguang, Ni Jinnv, Yang Fangyu, Chen Yingtai
Department of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Department of Clinical Nutrition, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Front Oncol. 2023 Feb 27;13:1058187. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1058187. eCollection 2023.
Currently, the supporting evidence for dietary counseling is insufficient. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of individualized dietary counseling on nutritional outcomes and quality of life (QOL) in patients undergoing surgery for gastric cancer.
This study was a prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial. The patients after surgery for gastric cancer were randomly assigned (1:1) to the intervention group and the control group. In the intervention group, patients receive individualized dietary counseling based on individual calorie needs and symptom assessment at 24 h before discharge, 14, 21, 30, and 60 days postoperatively. Patients in the control group received routine dietary counseling. The primary endpoint was body mass index (BMI) loss at 30, 60, and 90 days after surgery; the secondary endpoints were calorie and protein intake at 30 and 60 days after surgery, blood parameters, the 90-day readmission rate, and QOL at 90 days after surgery.
One hundred thirty patients were enrolled; 67 patients were assigned to the intervention group and 63 patients to the control group. Compared with the control group, patients in the intervention group were significantly less BMI loss at 30 days (-0.84 ± 0.65 vs. -1.29 ± 0.83), 60 days (-1.29 ± 0.92 vs. -1.77 ± 1.13), and 90 days (-1.37 ± 1.05 vs. -1.92 ± 1.66) after surgery (all 0.05). Subgroups analysis by surgery type showed that the intervention could significantly reduce BMI loss in patients undergoing total and proximal gastrectomy at 30 days (-0.75 ± 0.47 vs. -1.55 ± 1.10), 60 days (-1.59 ± 1.02 vs. -2.55 ± 1.16), and 90 days (-1.44 ± 1.19 vs. -3.26 ± 1.46) after surgery (all 0.05). At 60 days after surgery, calorie goals were reached in 35 patients (77.8%) in the intervention group and 14 patients (40.0%) in the control group ( = 0.001), and protein goals were reached in 40 patients (88.9%) in the intervention group and 17 patients (48.6%) in the control group ( 0.001). Regarding the QOL at 90 days after surgery, the patients in the intervention group had a significantly lower level of fatigue, shortness of breath and stomach pain, better physical function, and cognitive function ( 0.05).
Post-discharge individualized dietary counseling is an effective intervention to reduce post-gastrectomy patient weight loss and to elevate calorie intake, protein intake, and QOL.
目前,饮食咨询的支持证据不足。本研究旨在评估个体化饮食咨询对胃癌手术患者营养结局和生活质量(QOL)的影响。
本研究为一项前瞻性、单中心、随机对照试验。胃癌手术后的患者被随机(1:1)分配至干预组和对照组。干预组患者在出院前24小时、术后14天、21天、30天和60天,根据个人热量需求和症状评估接受个体化饮食咨询。对照组患者接受常规饮食咨询。主要终点为术后30天、60天和90天的体重指数(BMI)下降情况;次要终点为术后30天和60天的热量和蛋白质摄入量、血液参数、90天再入院率以及术后90天的生活质量。
共纳入130例患者;67例患者被分配至干预组,63例患者被分配至对照组。与对照组相比,干预组患者在术后30天(-0.84±0.65 vs. -1.29±0.83)、60天(-1.29±0.92 vs. -1.77±1.13)和90天(-1.37±1.05 vs. -1.92±1.66)的BMI下降明显更少(均P<0.05)。按手术类型进行的亚组分析显示,干预可显著降低全胃切除术和近端胃切除术患者在术后30天(-0.75±0.47 vs. -1.55±1.10)、60天(-1.59±1.02 vs. -2.55±1.16)和90天(-1.44±1.19 vs. -3.26±1.46)的BMI下降(均P<0.05)。术后60天,干预组35例患者(77.8%)达到热量目标,对照组14例患者(40.0%)达到热量目标(P = 0.001);干预组40例患者(88.9%)达到蛋白质目标,对照组17例患者(48.6%)达到蛋白质目标(P<0.001)。关于术后90天的生活质量,干预组患者的疲劳、呼吸急促和胃痛水平显著更低,身体功能和认知功能更好(P<0.05)。
出院后个体化饮食咨询是一种有效的干预措施,可减少胃切除术后患者的体重减轻,并提高热量摄入、蛋白质摄入和生活质量。