Stepping Hill Hospital, Stockport NHS Hospital Trust, Poplar grove, Stockport, UK.
Stepping Hill Hospital, Stockport NHS Hospital Trust, Poplar grove, Stockport, UK.
Foot (Edinb). 2023 Sep;56:101991. doi: 10.1016/j.foot.2023.101991. Epub 2023 Mar 5.
Various modalities of fixation have been proposed for Lisfranc injuries. Memory staple fixation offers a simple option for transarticular fixation in suitable fracture configuration with no diaphyseal extension. However there is little evidence available in the literature regarding its efficacy and patient reported outcomes. Aim of the study was to present the long term outcomes of Lisfranc injuries treated with memory staple fixation and patient reported outcomes at average follow-up of four years.
This was a retrospective analysis of all the patients who underwent fixation for Lisfranc injury using shape memory alloy (Nitinol) staples from December 2010 to October 2018. Patient demography, mechanism of injury, classification of Lisfranc injury, duration of followup, complication, revision surgery, implant removal and patient reported outcomes (AOFAS midfoot score) was noted.
31 patients satisfied the inclusion criteria. Mean age was 50 years and 17 patients were females. 54 % patients reported low to moderate energy trauma which included simple fall from standing height or twisting injury. 28 (90.3 %) had B2 type of fracture pattern. 13 had fixation with staples only, 15 with a staple and home run screw. No patient had primary fusion. One patient had superficial infection treated with antibiotics only. Three patients developed symptomatic arthritis, out of which one proceeded to fusion. Six had implant removal for hardware related symptoms. Average AOFAS midfoot score at average four years follow-up was 77.8 which are satisfactory.
This paper highlights good outcome following memory staple fixation for Lisfranc injuries. We believe staples are more suited for the dorsal buttressing that is typically required and provide stable, reproducible fixation Our findings also suggest less need for implant removal compared to transarticular screw or plate fixation though larger studies would be required to make definitive conclusions.
各种固定方式已被用于治疗 Lisfranc 损伤。记忆合金钉(Nitinol)提供了一种简单的经关节内固定选择,适用于无骨干延伸的特定骨折类型。然而,文献中关于其疗效和患者报告结果的证据很少。本研究旨在介绍采用记忆合金钉治疗 Lisfranc 损伤的长期结果和平均随访 4 年的患者报告结果。
这是一项回顾性分析,纳入 2010 年 12 月至 2018 年 10 月期间采用形状记忆合金(Nitinol)钉固定治疗 Lisfranc 损伤的所有患者。记录患者人口统计学、损伤机制、Lisfranc 损伤分类、随访时间、并发症、翻修手术、植入物取出和患者报告结果(AOFAS 中足评分)。
31 例患者符合纳入标准。平均年龄为 50 岁,女性 17 例。54%的患者报告为低至中度能量创伤,包括简单的站立高度摔倒或扭伤。28 例(90.3%)为 B2 型骨折模式。13 例仅用钉固定,15 例用钉和 Home Run 螺钉固定。没有患者进行了初次融合。1 例患者发生浅表感染,仅用抗生素治疗。3 例出现症状性关节炎,其中 1 例进行了融合。6 例因与植入物相关的症状取出植入物。平均随访 4 年时的 AOFAS 中足评分平均为 77.8,结果令人满意。
本文强调了记忆合金钉固定 Lisfranc 损伤的良好结果。我们认为,钉更适合通常需要的背侧支撑,提供稳定、可重复的固定。我们的发现还表明,与经关节螺钉或钢板固定相比,需要取出植入物的情况较少,尽管需要更大规模的研究才能得出明确的结论。