Suppr超能文献

新加坡一项全国性队列研究:SARS-CoV-2 感染和疫苗对有医疗记录的奥密克戎 BA.4、BA.5 和 XBB 再感染相关症状的保护免疫作用。

Protective immunity of SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccines against medically attended symptomatic omicron BA.4, BA.5, and XBB reinfections in Singapore: a national cohort study.

机构信息

Public Health Group, Ministry of Health, Singapore.

Public Health Group, Ministry of Health, Singapore; National Centre for Infectious Diseases, Singapore.

出版信息

Lancet Infect Dis. 2023 Jul;23(7):799-805. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(23)00060-9. Epub 2023 Mar 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite a large proportion of the population having been vaccinated and infected, Singapore had SARS-CoV-2 waves driven by the BA.5 and XBB sublineages of the omicron (B.1.1.529) variant. Data on the protective immunity against medically attended, symptomatic reinfections with omicron BA.4, BA.5, and XBB conferred by previous SARS-CoV-2 infections and vaccinations are scarce. We therefore aimed to derive information from Singapore's experience as one of the first countries with an XBB-driven wave.

METHODS

For this retrospective national cohort study, we used information from official databases of the Ministry of Health of Singapore to assess hybrid immunity (obtained from previous infection and vaccination) against medically attended, symptomatic BA.4 and BA.5 reinfections from Oct 1, 2022, to Nov 1, 2022, and medically attended, symptomatic XBB reinfections from Oct 18, 2022, to Nov 1, 2022, among Singapore citizens and permanent residents aged at least 18 years. All individuals with acute respiratory symptoms who presented at any health-care facility in Singapore between the stated dates were tested for SARS-CoV-2. Individuals were grouped into SARS-CoV-2-naive, pre-omicron, omicron BA.1, and omicron BA.2 groups according to their previous infection status. Data were also stratified by time from first infection to analyse the waning of immunity. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were measured by generalised linear Poisson regressions, with SARS-CoV-2-naive individuals as the reference group, and protective immunity was calculated as one minus the risk ratio multiplied by 100.

FINDINGS

2 456 791 individuals were included in the study, contributing 53·1 million person-days of observation for the SARS-CoV-2-naive group, 3·4 million person-days for the pre-omicron group, 6·6 million person-days for the BA.1 group, and 13·7 million person-days for the BA.2 group between Oct 1, 2022, and Nov 1, 2022. Compared with SARS-CoV-2-naive individuals, first infections with pre-omicron variants did not confer protection against reinfection with BA.4 or BA.5 (IRR 0·87 [95% CI 0·73-1·05] for pre-omicron infection with booster vaccination) or XBB (IRR 1·29 [1·23-1·35] for pre-omicron infection with booster vaccination). Previous BA.2 infection with booster provided the greatest protection against reinfection, but this was lower against reinfection with XBB (protective immunity 51%; 95% CI 49-53) than against reinfection with BA.4 or BA.5 (78%; 74-82). Protection conferred by previous BA.2 infection against XBB reinfection waned faster over time from first infection (from 74% [72-75] at 3-6 months to 49% [47-52] at 7-8 months) than protection against BA.4 or BA.5 reinfection (from 87% [82-90] at 3-6 months to 74% [66-80] at 7-8 months).

INTERPRETATION

Protection against XBB reinfection conferred by a previous omicron infection with vaccination was lower and waned faster than protection against BA.4 or BA.5 reinfection, which is indicative of the greater immune evasiveness of the XBB sublineage. Although severe COVID-19 is uncommon, populations remain vulnerable to future reinfection waves from emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants despite high rates of vaccination and infection, as reflected by substantially higher reinfection rates during Singapore's XBB wave than during the previous BA.5-driven wave. Policy makers could consider emerging public health interventions, such as omicron-adapted bivalent vaccines, to maintain population immunity against COVID-19.

FUNDING

None.

摘要

背景

尽管新加坡很大一部分人口已经接种了疫苗并感染了新冠病毒,但仍出现了由 omicron(B.1.1.529)变体的 BA.5 和 XBB 亚系驱动的 SARS-CoV-2 波。关于先前感染 SARS-CoV-2 和接种疫苗对 omicron BA.4、BA.5 和 XBB 引起的有症状再感染的保护免疫力的数据很少。因此,我们旨在从新加坡的经验中获取信息,新加坡是第一个受到 XBB 驱动波影响的国家之一。

方法

在这项回顾性全国队列研究中,我们使用了新加坡卫生部的官方数据库中的信息,评估了混合免疫力(通过先前的感染和接种获得),以对抗 2022 年 10 月 1 日至 2022 年 11 月 1 日期间出现的有症状的 BA.4 和 BA.5 再感染,以及 2022 年 10 月 18 日至 2022 年 11 月 1 日期间出现的有症状的 XBB 再感染,对象为至少 18 岁的新加坡公民和永久居民。在规定日期内,所有有急性呼吸道症状的人在任何医疗保健机构就诊时都接受了 SARS-CoV-2 检测。根据他们以前的感染状况,个体被分为 SARS-CoV-2 初染者、前 omicron 组、omicron BA.1 组和 omicron BA.2 组。还根据从首次感染到分析免疫力下降的时间进行了分层。通过广义线性泊松回归测量发病率比值(IRR),以 SARS-CoV-2 初染者为参考组,并计算保护免疫力为 1 减去风险比乘以 100。

结果

共有 2456791 人参与了这项研究,为 SARS-CoV-2 初染者组贡献了 5310 万人日的观察期、340 万人日的前 omicron 组、660 万人日的 BA.1 组和 1370 万人日的 BA.2 组,时间为 2022 年 10 月 1 日至 2022 年 11 月 1 日。与 SARS-CoV-2 初染者相比,先前感染前 omicron 变体并不能预防 BA.4 或 BA.5(对于前 omicron 感染加疫苗加强针,IRR 0.87 [95%CI 0.73-1.05])或 XBB(对于前 omicron 感染加疫苗加强针,IRR 1.29 [1.23-1.35])的再感染。先前 BA.2 感染加疫苗加强针提供了对再感染的最大保护,但对 XBB 的保护作用较低(保护性免疫力 51%;95%CI 49-53),低于对 BA.4 或 BA.5 的再感染(78%;74-82)。先前 BA.2 感染对 XBB 再感染的保护作用随首次感染时间的推移而迅速减弱(从 3-6 个月的 74% [72-75]到 7-8 个月的 49% [47-52]),而不是对 BA.4 或 BA.5 再感染(从 3-6 个月的 87% [82-90]到 7-8 个月的 74% [66-80])。

解释

先前感染 omicron 加疫苗接种对 XBB 再感染的保护作用较低,且减弱速度较快,这表明 XBB 亚系的免疫逃逸能力更强。尽管严重的 COVID-19 并不常见,但由于高疫苗接种率和感染率,人群仍然容易受到新出现的 SARS-CoV-2 变体的未来再感染波的影响,这反映了新加坡 XBB 波期间的再感染率明显高于之前的 BA.5 驱动波。政策制定者可以考虑新出现的公共卫生干预措施,例如针对 omicron 的二价疫苗,以维持人群对 COVID-19 的免疫力。

资金

无。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ce1/10306341/d199bc78616a/gr1_lrg.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验