• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[腹腔镜与开放盆腔脏器清除术治疗局部晚期直肠癌:短期和长期效果分析]

[Laparoscopic versus open pelvic exenteration for locally advanced rectal cancer: analysis of short- and long-term effects].

作者信息

Tang J Q, Zhang J Z, Mei S W, Hu G, Wan Y L, Wang X, Wang X S

机构信息

Department of Colorectal Surenrry, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.

Department of General Surgery, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Mar 25;26(3):253-259. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20230222-00049.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20230222-00049
PMID:36925125
Abstract

To explore the feasibility, safety, and short- and long-term efficacy of laparoscopic pelvic exenteration (LPE) in treating locally advanced rectal cancer. The clinical data of 173 patients who had undergone pelvic exenteration (PE) for locally advanced rectal cancer that had been shown by preoperative imaging or intraoperative exploration to have invaded beyond the mesorectal excision plane and adjacent organs in the Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (=64) and Peking University First Hospital (=109) from 2010 January to 2021 December were collected retrospectively. Laparoscopic PE (LPE) had been performed on 82 of these patients and open PE (OPE) on 91. Short- and long-term outcomes (1-, 3-, and 5-year overall and disease-free survival and 1- and 3-year cumulative local recurrence rates) were compared between these groups. The only statistically significant difference in baseline data between the two groups (>0.05) was administration of neoadjuvant therapy. Compared with OPE, LPE had a significantly shorter operative time (319.3±129.3 minutes versus 417.3±155.0 minutes, =4.531, <0.001) and less intraoperative blood loss (175 [20-2000] ml vs. 500 [20-4500] ml, =2206.500, <0.001). The R0 resection rates were 98.8% and 94.5%, respectively (χ=2.355, =0.214). At 18.3% (15/82), and the incidence of perioperative complications was lower in the LPE group than in the OPE group (37.4% [34/91], χ=7.727, =0.005). The rates of surgical site infection were 7.3% (6/82) and 23.1% (21/91) in the LPE and OPE group, respectively (χ=8.134, =0.004). The rates of abdominal wound infection were 0 and 12.1% (11/91) (χ=10.585, =0.001), respectively, and of urinary tract infection 0 and 6.6% (6/91) (χ=5.601, =0.030), respectively. Postoperative hospital stay was shorter in the LPE than OPE group (12 [4-60] days vs. 15 [7-87] days, =2498.000, <0.001). The median follow-up time was 40 (2-88) months in the LPE group and 59 (1-130) months in the OPE group. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 91.3%, 76.0%, and 62.5%, respectively, in the LPE group, and 91.2%, 68.9%, and 57.6%, respectively, in the OPE group. The 1, 3, and 5-year disease-free survival rates were 82.8%, 64.9%, and 59.7%, respectively, in the LPE group and 76.9%, 57.8%, and 52.7%, respectively, in the OPE group. The 1- and 3-year cumulative local recurrence rates were 5.1% and 14.1%, respectively, in the LPE group and 8.0% and 15.1%, respectively, in the OPE group (both >0.05). In locally advanced rectal cancer patients, LPE is associated with shorter operative time, less intraoperative blood loss, fewer perioperative complications, and shorter hospital stay compared with OPE. It is safe and feasible without compromising oncological effect.

摘要

探讨腹腔镜盆腔脏器清除术(LPE)治疗局部晚期直肠癌的可行性、安全性及短期和长期疗效。回顾性收集2010年1月至2021年12月在中国医学科学院肿瘤医院(=64)和北京大学第一医院(=109)因术前影像学检查或术中探查显示局部晚期直肠癌侵犯超过直肠系膜切除平面及相邻器官而接受盆腔脏器清除术(PE)的173例患者的临床资料。其中82例患者接受了腹腔镜PE(LPE),91例接受了开放PE(OPE)。比较两组的短期和长期结局(1年、3年和5年总生存率和无病生存率以及1年和3年累积局部复发率)。两组基线数据之间唯一具有统计学意义的差异(>0.05)是新辅助治疗的应用情况。与OPE相比,LPE的手术时间显著缩短(319.3±129.3分钟对417.3±155.0分钟,=4.531,<0.001),术中出血量更少(175[20 - 2000]ml对500[20 - 4500]ml,=2206.500,<0.001)。R0切除率分别为98.8%和94.5%(χ=2.355,=0.214)。LPE组围手术期并发症发生率为18.3%(15/82),低于OPE组(37.4%[34/91],χ=7.727,=0.005)。LPE组和OPE组手术部位感染率分别为7.3%(6/82)和23.1%(21/91)(χ=8.134,=0.004)。腹部伤口感染率分别为0和12.1%(11/91)(χ=10.585,=0.001),尿路感染率分别为0和6.6%(6/91)(χ=5.601,=0.030)。LPE组术后住院时间短于OPE组(12[4 - 60]天对15[7 - 87]天,=2498.000,<0.001)。LPE组中位随访时间为40(2 - 88)个月,OPE组为59(1 - 130)个月。LPE组1年、3年和5年总生存率分别为91.3%、76.0%和62.5%,OPE组分别为91.2%、68.9%和57.6%。LPE组1年、3年和5年无病生存率分别为82.8%、64.9%和59.7%,OPE组分别为76.9%、57.8%和52.7%。LPE组1年和3年累积局部复发率分别为5.1%和14.1%,OPE组分别为8.0%和15.1%(均>0.05)。在局部晚期直肠癌患者中,与OPE相比,LPE手术时间更短、术中出血量更少、围手术期并发症更少且住院时间更短。其安全可行,不影响肿瘤学疗效。

相似文献

1
[Laparoscopic versus open pelvic exenteration for locally advanced rectal cancer: analysis of short- and long-term effects].[腹腔镜与开放盆腔脏器清除术治疗局部晚期直肠癌:短期和长期效果分析]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Mar 25;26(3):253-259. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20230222-00049.
2
Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open pelvic exenteration for locally advanced rectal cancer: a single-center propensity score matching analysis.腹腔镜与开腹盆腔廓清术治疗局部进展期直肠癌的短期和长期疗效:单中心倾向评分匹配分析。
Tech Coloproctol. 2023 Jan;27(1):43-52. doi: 10.1007/s10151-022-02691-0. Epub 2022 Oct 4.
3
Initial experience of laparoscopic pelvic exenteration and comparison with conventional open surgery.腹腔镜盆腔脏器清除术的初步经验及与传统开放手术的比较。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Jan;30(1):132-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4172-3. Epub 2015 Mar 21.
4
Robotic versus open and laparoscopic pelvic exenterations for pelvic cancer: a multicenter propensity-matched analysis in Japan.机器人与开放和腹腔镜盆腔廓清术治疗盆腔癌:日本多中心倾向评分匹配分析。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Aug;38(8):4390-4401. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10966-w. Epub 2024 Jun 17.
5
Laparoscopic Pelvic Exenteration for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer, Technique and Short-Term Outcomes.腹腔镜盆腔脏器切除术治疗局部晚期直肠癌:技术与短期疗效
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Dec;28(12):1489-1494. doi: 10.1089/lap.2018.0147. Epub 2018 May 9.
6
[Clinical study of using basement membrane biological products in pelvic floor reconstruction during pelvic exenteration].[盆腔脏器清除术中使用基底膜生物制品进行盆底重建的临床研究]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Mar 25;26(3):268-276. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20221208-00516.
7
Laparoscopic posterior pelvic exenteration is safe and feasible for locally advanced primary rectal cancer in female patients: a comparative study from China PelvEx collaborative.腹腔镜盆腔后切除术治疗女性局部晚期原发性直肠癌的安全性和可行性:中国 PelvEx 协作组的一项对比研究。
Tech Coloproctol. 2023 Nov;27(11):1109-1117. doi: 10.1007/s10151-023-02824-z. Epub 2023 May 27.
8
[Analysis on risk factors of the degree of radical resection and prognosis of patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer].[局部复发性直肠癌患者根治性切除程度及预后的危险因素分析]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 May 25;23(5):472-479. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn.441530-20200207-00042.
9
Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open lateral lymph node dissection for locally advanced middle/lower rectal cancer using a propensity score-matched analysis.采用倾向评分匹配分析比较腹腔镜与开腹侧方淋巴结清扫术治疗局部进展期中/低位直肠癌的短期和长期疗效。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Aug;35(8):4427-4435. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07943-4. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
10
Feasibility and safety of minimally invasive multivisceral resection for T4b rectal cancer: A 9-year review.T4b期直肠癌微创多脏器切除术的可行性与安全性:一项9年回顾
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 Mar 27;16(3):777-789. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i3.777.