Suppr超能文献

采用倾向评分匹配分析比较腹腔镜与开腹侧方淋巴结清扫术治疗局部进展期中/低位直肠癌的短期和长期疗效。

Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open lateral lymph node dissection for locally advanced middle/lower rectal cancer using a propensity score-matched analysis.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, 4-57, Urafune-cho, Minami-ku, Yokohama, 232-0024, Japan.

Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2021 Aug;35(8):4427-4435. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07943-4. Epub 2020 Sep 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are few reports on large-scale trials for the long-term outcomes regarding laparoscopic lateral lymph node dissection (LLND). We evaluated the short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open LLND for locally advanced middle/lower rectal cancer using a propensity score-matched analysis.

METHODS

From January 2005 to December 2016, consecutive clinical stage II to III middle/lower rectal cancer patients who underwent total mesorectal excision (TME) plus LLND were retrospectively collected at three institutions. Laparoscopic LLND was compared with open LLND for the surgical and oncological outcomes, including the long-term survival, using a propensity score-matched analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 325 patients were collected. There were 142 patients who underwent open TME plus LLND (open group) and 183 patients who underwent laparoscopic TME plus LLND (laparoscopic group). A total of 93 patients each were matched to each group. Compared to the open group, the laparoscopic group had a significantly longer operative time (327 vs. 377 min; p = 0.002) but significantly less blood loss (540 vs. 50 ml; p < 0.001), fewer Clavian-Dindo grade ≥ 2 postoperative complications (49.5% vs. 34.4%; p = 0.037) and shorter postoperative hospital stay (18 vs. 14 days; p = 0.008). Furthermore, the rate of urinary retention was significantly lower in the laparoscopic group than in the open group (16.1% vs. 6.5%; p = 0.037). The estimated 3-year overall survival, relapse-free survival, and cumulative incidence of local recurrence were 91.4%, 73.1%, and 3.4% in the open group and 90.3%, 74.2%, and 4.3% in the laparoscopic group (p = 0.879, 0.893, 0.999), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that laparoscopic LLND had advantages over an open approach, such as less blood loss, fewer postoperative complications, and a shorter postoperative hospital stay, and the oncologic outcomes were similar to the open approach. Laparoscopic LLND could be a viable standard approach to LLND for advanced middle/lower rectal cancer surgery.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜侧方淋巴结清扫术(LLND)的长期疗效大样本研究报道较少。本研究通过倾向评分匹配分析,评估腹腔镜与开腹 LLND 治疗局部进展期中低位直肠癌的短期和长期疗效。

方法

2005 年 1 月至 2016 年 12 月,三所机构连续收集接受全直肠系膜切除术(TME)加 LLND 的临床 II 至 III 期中低位直肠腺癌患者。通过倾向评分匹配分析比较腹腔镜 LLND 与开腹 LLND 的手术和肿瘤学结果,包括长期生存情况。

结果

共纳入 325 例患者。其中 142 例行开腹 TME 加 LLND(开腹组),183 例行腹腔镜 TME 加 LLND(腹腔镜组)。每组匹配 93 例患者。与开腹组相比,腹腔镜组手术时间显著延长(327 分钟 vs. 377 分钟;p=0.002),术中出血量显著减少(540 毫升 vs. 50 毫升;p<0.001),Clavian-Dindo 分级≥2 级的术后并发症发生率显著降低(49.5% vs. 34.4%;p=0.037),术后住院时间显著缩短(18 天 vs. 14 天;p=0.008)。此外,腹腔镜组的尿潴留发生率显著低于开腹组(16.1% vs. 6.5%;p=0.037)。开腹组和腹腔镜组的 3 年总生存率、无复发生存率和局部复发累积发生率分别为 91.4%、73.1%和 3.4%和 90.3%、74.2%和 4.3%(p=0.879、0.893、0.999)。

结论

本研究表明,与开腹相比,腹腔镜 LLND 具有出血少、术后并发症少、术后住院时间短等优势,且肿瘤学结果与开腹相似。腹腔镜 LLND 可能成为治疗中低位局部进展期直肠癌的可行标准方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验