Medical College of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, China; Department of Plastic Surgery, Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, China.
Department of Plastic Surgery, Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, China; The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, China.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023 Oct;52(10):1049-1056. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2023.01.021. Epub 2023 Mar 14.
The purpose of this study was to review the existing evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the effect of autogenous bone grafts combined with a platelet-rich concentrate on alveolar clefts. An electronic search was conducted in the PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases for studies published between January 2000 and April 2022. This study included six RCTs to evaluate bone quantity (bone formation ratio, %) and quality (bone density in Hounsfield units, HU), as well as complications as a way to assess the safety of the technique. Two independent reviewers assessed the risk of bias. There was no statistically significant difference in bone formation ratio at 6 months of follow-up between the use of autologous bone alone for alveolar bone grafting or adding platelet-rich plasma (PRP) (mean difference (MD) 14.33%, 95% confidence interval (CI) - 7.19% to 35.85%; P = 0.196) or platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) (MD 9.38%, 95% CI -2.36% to 21.12%; P = 0.123) to autologous bone. The MD for the change in bone density at 6 months was in favour of PRP added to autologous bone graft (MD 155.69 HU, 95% CI 99.29-212.09 HU; P < 0.001); however, this result was based on only two studies, one of which had a high risk of bias. Patients who received autologous bone graft with PRP were significantly less likely to experience complications (odds ratio (OR) 0.21, 95% CI 0.05-0.92; P = 0.038), but this was no longer statistically significant after a sensitivity test (OR 0.24, 95% CI 0.04-1.56; P = 0.138). In conclusion, this systematic review and meta-analysis appears to show no benefit to using a platelet-rich concentrate combined with autologous bone for alveolar cleft grafting in terms of bone volume, bone density, or complications.
本研究旨在回顾 2000 年 1 月至 2022 年 4 月期间发表的随机对照试验(RCT)中关于自体骨移植联合富含血小板的浓缩物对牙槽裂影响的现有证据。在 PubMed/MEDLINE、Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库、Embase 和 ClinicalTrials.gov 数据库中进行了电子检索。本研究纳入了 6 项 RCT,以评估骨量(骨形成率,%)和质量(骨密度,HU),以及并发症,以评估该技术的安全性。两名独立的审查员评估了偏倚风险。在 6 个月的随访中,单独使用自体骨进行牙槽骨移植或添加富含血小板的血浆(PRP)(平均差异(MD)14.33%,95%置信区间(CI)-7.19%至 35.85%;P=0.196)或富含血小板的纤维蛋白(PRF)(MD 9.38%,95%CI-2.36%至 21.12%;P=0.123)与自体骨相比,骨形成率无统计学差异。6 个月时骨密度变化的 MD 有利于 PRP 与自体骨移植物联合使用(MD 155.69HU,95%CI 99.29-212.09HU;P<0.001);然而,这一结果仅基于两项研究,其中一项研究存在较高的偏倚风险。与单独使用自体骨移植相比,接受富含血小板的 PRP 自体骨移植的患者发生并发症的可能性显著降低(比值比(OR)0.21,95%CI 0.05-0.92;P=0.038),但在敏感性测试后,这一结果不再具有统计学意义(OR 0.24,95%CI 0.04-1.56;P=0.138)。综上所述,本系统评价和荟萃分析似乎表明,在牙槽裂植骨中使用富含血小板的浓缩物联合自体骨在骨量、骨密度或并发症方面没有益处。