Ma Wenbo, Zhang Mingsha
State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning and IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Division of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Front Neurosci. 2023 Feb 28;17:1112655. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1112655. eCollection 2023.
Multiple step saccades (MSSs) are an atypical form of saccade that consists of a series of small-amplitude saccades. It has been argued that the mechanism for generating MSS is due to the automatic saccadic plan. This argument was based on the observation that trials with MSS had shorter saccadic latency than trials without MSS in the reactive saccades. However, the validity of this argument has never been verified by other saccadic tasks. Alternatively, we and other researchers have speculated that the function of MSS is the same as that of the corrective saccade (CS), i.e., to correct saccadic errors. Thus, we propose that the function of the MSS is also to rectify saccadic errors and generated by forward internal models. The objective of the present study is to examine whether the automatic theory is universally applicable for the generation of MSSs in various saccadic tasks and to seek other possible mechanisms, such as error correction by forward internal models.
Fifty young healthy subjects (YHSs) and fifty elderly healthy subjects (EHSs) were recruited in the present study. The task paradigms were prosaccade (PS), anti-saccade (AS) and memory-guided saccade (MGS) tasks.
Saccadic latency in trials with MSS was shorter than without MSS in the PS task but similar in the AS and MGS tasks. The intersaccadic intervals (ISI) were similar among the three tasks in both YHSs and EHSs.
Our results indicate that the automatic theory is not a universal mechanism. Instead, the forward internal model for saccadic error correction might be an important mechanism.
多步扫视(MSSs)是一种非典型的扫视形式,由一系列小幅度扫视组成。有人认为,产生MSS的机制是由于自动扫视计划。这一观点基于这样的观察,即在反应性扫视中,有MSS的试验的扫视潜伏期比没有MSS的试验短。然而,这一观点的有效性从未在其他扫视任务中得到验证。另外,我们和其他研究人员推测,MSS的功能与校正扫视(CS)的功能相同,即校正扫视误差。因此,我们提出,MSS的功能也是校正扫视误差,并由前向内部模型产生。本研究的目的是检验自动理论是否普遍适用于各种扫视任务中MSS的产生,并寻找其他可能的机制,如前向内部模型的误差校正。
本研究招募了50名年轻健康受试者(YHSs)和50名老年健康受试者(EHSs)。任务范式为同向扫视(PS)、反向扫视(AS)和记忆引导扫视(MGS)任务。
在PS任务中,有MSS的试验的扫视潜伏期比没有MSS的试验短,但在AS和MGS任务中相似。在YHSs和EHSs中,三个任务的扫视间隔(ISI)相似。
我们的结果表明,自动理论不是一种普遍机制。相反,用于扫视误差校正的前向内部模型可能是一种重要机制。