Coe Brian C, Munoz Douglas P
Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada K7l 3N6
Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada K7l 3N6.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2017 Apr 19;372(1718). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0192.
The anti-saccade task has emerged as an important tool for investigating the complex nature of voluntary behaviour. In this task, participants are instructed to suppress the natural response to look at a peripheral visual stimulus and look in the opposite direction instead. Analysis of saccadic reaction times (SRT: the time from stimulus appearance to the first saccade) and the frequency of direction errors (i.e. looking toward the stimulus) provide insight into saccade suppression mechanisms in the brain. Some direction errors are reflexive responses with very short SRTs (express latency saccades), while other direction errors are driven by automated responses and have longer SRTs. These different types of errors reveal that the anti-saccade task requires different forms of suppression, and neurophysiological experiments in macaques have revealed several potential mechanisms. At the start of an anti-saccade trial, pre-emptive top-down inhibition of saccade generating neurons in the frontal eye fields and superior colliculus must be present before the stimulus appears to prevent express latency direction errors. After the stimulus appears, voluntary anti-saccade commands must compete with, and override, automated visually initiated saccade commands to prevent longer latency direction errors. The frequencies of these types of direction errors, as well as SRTs, change throughout the lifespan and reveal time courses for development, maturation, and ageing. Additionally, patients diagnosed with a variety of neurological and/or psychiatric disorders affecting the frontal lobes and/or basal ganglia produce markedly different SRT distributions and types of direction errors, which highlight specific deficits in saccade suppression and inhibitory control. The anti-saccade task therefore provides valuable insight into the neural mechanisms of saccade suppression and is a valuable tool in a clinical setting.This article is part of the themed issue 'Movement suppression: brain mechanisms for stopping and stillness'.
反扫视任务已成为研究自愿行为复杂本质的重要工具。在这个任务中,参与者被指示抑制看向周边视觉刺激的自然反应,而是看向相反的方向。对扫视反应时间(SRT:从刺激出现到首次扫视的时间)和方向错误频率(即看向刺激的方向)的分析,有助于深入了解大脑中的扫视抑制机制。一些方向错误是具有非常短SRT的反射性反应(快速潜伏期扫视),而其他方向错误则由自动反应驱动,具有更长的SRT。这些不同类型的错误表明,反扫视任务需要不同形式的抑制,猕猴的神经生理学实验已经揭示了几种潜在机制。在反扫视试验开始时,在刺激出现之前,额叶眼区和上丘中产生扫视的神经元必须存在先发制人的自上而下抑制,以防止快速潜伏期方向错误。刺激出现后,自愿的反扫视指令必须与自动的视觉引发的扫视指令竞争并超越它们,以防止更长潜伏期的方向错误。这些类型的方向错误的频率以及SRT在整个生命周期中都会发生变化,并揭示发育、成熟和衰老的时间进程。此外,被诊断患有影响额叶和/或基底神经节的各种神经和/或精神疾病的患者,其SRT分布和方向错误类型明显不同,这突出了扫视抑制和抑制控制方面的特定缺陷。因此,反扫视任务为扫视抑制的神经机制提供了有价值的见解,并且是临床环境中的一种有价值的工具。本文是主题为“运动抑制:停止和静止的脑机制”的特刊的一部分。