Forchuk Cheryl, Serrato Jonathan, Scott Leanne
Mental Health Nursing Research Alliance, Lawson Health Research Institute, London, ON, Canada.
Arthur Labatt Family School of Nursing, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Front Health Serv. 2023 Feb 7;3:1113891. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2023.1113891. eCollection 2023.
Harm reduction strategies for substance use disorder are not currently offered in Canadian hospitals. Previous research has suggested that substance use may continue to occur which can lead to further complications such as new infections. Harm reduction strategies may be a solution to this issue. This secondary analysis aims to explore the current barriers and potential facilitators for implementing harm reduction into the hospital from the perspective of health care and service providers.
Primary data was collected from 31 health care and service providers who participated in a series of virtual focus groups and one-to-one interviews regarding their perspectives on harm reduction. All staff were recruited from hospitals in Southwestern Ontario, Canada from February 2021 to December 2021. Health care and service professionals completed a one-time individual interview or a virtual focus group using an open-ended qualitative interview survey. Qualitative data was transcribed verbatim and analyzed using an ethnographic thematic approach. Themes and subthemes were identified and coded based on responses.
Attitude and Knowledge, Pragmatics, and Safety/Reduction of Harm were identified as the core themes. Attitudinal barriers such as stigma and lack of acceptance were reported but education, openness and community support were regarded as potential facilitators. Cost, space, time and availability of substances on site were regarded as Pragmatic barriers but potential facilitators such as organizational support, flexible harm reduction services and a specialized team were identified. Policy and liability were perceived as both a barrier and a potential facilitator. Safety and impact of substances on treatment were considered as both a barrier and a potential facilitator but sharps boxes and continuity of care were regarded as potential facilitators.
Although barriers in implementing harm reduction in hospital settings exist, there are opportunities to facilitate change. As identified in this study, feasible and achievable solutions are available. Education on harm reduction for staff was considered to be a key clinical implication in facilitating harm reduction implementation.
加拿大医院目前未提供针对物质使用障碍的减少伤害策略。先前的研究表明,物质使用可能会持续发生,这可能导致进一步的并发症,如新感染。减少伤害策略可能是解决此问题的办法。本二次分析旨在从医疗保健和服务提供者的角度探讨目前在医院实施减少伤害措施的障碍和潜在促进因素。
从31名医疗保健和服务提供者收集了原始数据,他们参与了一系列关于减少伤害观点的虚拟焦点小组和一对一访谈。所有工作人员均于2021年2月至2021年12月从加拿大安大略省西南部的医院招募。医疗保健和服务专业人员使用开放式定性访谈调查问卷完成了一次性个人访谈或虚拟焦点小组访谈。定性数据逐字转录,并采用人种学主题方法进行分析。根据回答确定主题和子主题并进行编码。
态度与知识、实用性以及安全/减少伤害被确定为核心主题。报告了诸如耻辱感和缺乏接纳等态度障碍,但教育、开放态度和社区支持被视为潜在促进因素。成本、空间、时间和现场物质的可得性被视为实用障碍,但确定了诸如组织支持、灵活的减少伤害服务和专业团队等潜在促进因素。政策和责任被视为既是障碍又是潜在促进因素。物质对治疗的安全性和影响被视为既是障碍又是潜在促进因素,但锐器盒和连续护理被视为潜在促进因素。
尽管在医院环境中实施减少伤害存在障碍,但仍有促进变革的机会。如本研究中所确定的,有可行且可实现的解决方案。对工作人员进行减少伤害教育被认为是促进减少伤害实施的关键临床意义。