Chan Ming-Sheng, Sigward Susan
Performance Science, San Francisco Giants, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Division of Biokinesiology and Physical Therapy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Front Sports Act Living. 2023 Feb 28;5:1090694. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2023.1090694. eCollection 2023.
Understanding the extent to which attention prioritization interfere with limb loading in daily activities following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLr) is important for reshaping loading behaviors. A dual-task paradigm, prioritizing limb loading symmetry (LLS) during standing or response time during an upper extremity task response time task was used to probe the effects of attention prioritization of loading. Individuals 115.6 ± 17.8 days post-ACLr (ACLr; = 13) and matched healthy individuals ( = 13; CTRL) performed a simple response time (RT) task and 2 dual tasks prioritizing limb loading (LS-RT) and response time (RT-LS). 2 × 3 General Linear Model repeated measures analyses determined effects of group and focus condition on LLS error and response time. Significant interaction ( = 0.010) was noted in LLS error. ACLr group, exhibited greater LLS error in RT ( = 0.001) and RT-LS ( = 0.001) than LS-RT condition. ACLr group exhibited greater LLS error in the RT ( = 0.001) and RT-LS ( = 0.040) than CTRL, but not in LS-RT. A main effect of condition ( < 0.001) for response time indicated that times were slower in LS-RT compared to RT ( < 0.001) and to RT-LS ( < 0.001) for both groups. These data suggest that limb loading symmetry during standing is more automatic for controls than individuals following ACLr. Unlike controls, improving loading symmetry during standing requires additional attention in individuals in early recovery following ACLr.
了解注意力优先级在前交叉韧带重建(ACLr)后日常活动中对肢体负荷的干扰程度,对于重塑负荷行为非常重要。采用双任务范式,即在站立时优先考虑肢体负荷对称性(LLS)或在上肢任务反应时间任务中优先考虑反应时间,以探究负荷注意力优先级的影响。ACLr术后115.6±17.8天的个体(ACLr组;n = 13)和匹配的健康个体(n = 13;对照组)进行了简单反应时间(RT)任务以及两项分别优先考虑肢体负荷(LS-RT)和反应时间(RT-LS)的双任务。2×3通用线性模型重复测量分析确定了组别和专注条件对LLS误差和反应时间的影响。在LLS误差方面发现了显著的交互作用(p = 0.010)。ACLr组在RT(p = 0.001)和RT-LS(p = 0.001)条件下比LS-RT条件表现出更大的LLS误差。ACLr组在RT(p = 0.001)和RT-LS(p = 0.040)条件下比对照组表现出更大的LLS误差,但在LS-RT条件下没有。反应时间的条件主效应(p < 0.001)表明,两组在LS-RT条件下的时间比RT(p < 0.001)和RT-LS(p < 0.001)都要慢。这些数据表明,与ACLr后的个体相比,站立时肢体负荷对称性对对照组来说更具自动性。与对照组不同,ACLr后早期恢复的个体在站立时改善负荷对称性需要额外的注意力。