Baumgart Christian, Schubert Markus, Hoppe Matthias W, Gokeler Alli, Freiwald Jürgen
Department of Movement and Training Science, University of Wuppertal, Fuhlrottstraße 10, 42119, Wuppertal, Germany.
Clinic of Trauma Surgery and Orthopedics, HELIOS Klinikum Wuppertal, Heusnerstraße 40, 42283, Wuppertal, Germany.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 May;25(5):1385-1394. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3623-7. Epub 2015 May 10.
The aims of the study were (1) to evaluate the leg asymmetry assessed with ground reaction forces (GRFs) during unilateral and bilateral movements of different knee loads in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructed patients and (2) to investigate differences in leg asymmetry depending on the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Form (IKDC) in order to identify potential compensation strategies.
The knee function of 50 ACL reconstructed (patella tendon) patients was examined at 31 ± 7 months after the surgery. GRFs were quantified during the sit-to-stand and stand-to-sit test, the step-up and step-down test, and the two- and one-leg vertical jump. Further, the IKDC score, the anterior-posterior knee laxity, and the concentric torque of the quadriceps and hamstring muscles were evaluated.
Differences between the operated and non-operated leg were found in the knee laxity, the quadriceps torque, and GRFs. The patients with low IKDC scores demonstrated greater leg asymmetries in GRFs compared to the patients with high IKDC scores.
ACL reconstructed patients showed GRF asymmetries during unilateral and bilateral movements of different knee loads. Three compensation strategies were found in patients with low subjective knee function: (1) a reduced eccentric load, (2) an inter-limb compensation during bilateral movements, and (3) the avoidance of high vertical impact forces. These compensation strategies may be indicative of a protective adaptation to avoid excessive ACL strain. GRF measurements are practicable and efficient tools to identify individual compensation strategies during early rehabilitation.
本研究的目的是:(1)评估前交叉韧带(ACL)重建患者在不同膝关节负荷的单侧和双侧运动过程中,通过地面反作用力(GRF)评估的腿部不对称情况;(2)根据国际膝关节文献委员会主观评分表(IKDC)调查腿部不对称的差异,以确定潜在的代偿策略。
对50例接受ACL重建(髌腱)手术的患者在术后31±7个月时的膝关节功能进行检查。在坐立和站立坐测试、上台阶和下台阶测试以及双腿和单腿垂直跳跃过程中对GRF进行量化。此外,还评估了IKDC评分、膝关节前后松弛度以及股四头肌和腘绳肌的向心扭矩。
在膝关节松弛度、股四头肌扭矩和GRF方面发现了患侧与健侧之间的差异。与IKDC评分高的患者相比,IKDC评分低的患者在GRF方面表现出更大的腿部不对称。
ACL重建患者在不同膝关节负荷的单侧和双侧运动过程中表现出GRF不对称。在膝关节主观功能差的患者中发现了三种代偿策略:(1)减少离心负荷;(2)双侧运动过程中的肢体间代偿;(3)避免高垂直冲击力。这些代偿策略可能表明是一种保护性适应,以避免ACL过度受力。GRF测量是在早期康复过程中识别个体代偿策略的实用且有效的工具。