Serviço de Endoscopia Gastrointestinal, Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo 05403010, Brazil.
Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 021115, United States.
World J Gastroenterol. 2023 Feb 21;29(7):1173-1193. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i7.1173.
Post-surgical leaks and fistulas are the most feared complication of bariatric surgery. They have become more common in clinical practice given the increasing number of these procedures and can be very difficult to treat. These two related conditions must be distinguished and characterized to guide the appropriate treatment. Leak is defined as a transmural defect with communication between the intra and extraluminal compartments, while fistula is defined as an abnormal communication between two epithelialized surfaces. Traditionally, surgical treatment was the preferred approach for leaks and fistulas and was associated with high morbidity with significant mortality rates. However, with the development of novel devices and techniques, endoscopic therapy plays an increasingly essential role in managing these conditions. Early diagnosis and endoscopic therapy initiation after clinical stabilization are crucial to success since clinical success rates are higher for acute leaks and fistulas when compared to late and chronic leaks and fistulas. Several endoscopic techniques are available with different mechanisms of action, including direct closure, covering/diverting or draining. The treatment should be individualized by considering the characteristics of both the patient and the defect. Although there is a lack of high-quality studies to provide standardized treatment algorithms, this narrative review aims to provide a summary of the current scientific evidence and, based on this data and our extensive experience, make recommendations to help choose the best endoscopic approach for the management of post-bariatric surgical leaks and fistulas.
术后漏和瘘是减重手术最令人恐惧的并发症。由于此类手术数量的增加,这些并发症在临床实践中变得更为常见,且治疗难度较大。这两种相关病症必须加以区分和明确,以指导进行恰当的治疗。漏定义为贯穿壁层的缺陷,存在腔内外间隙之间的沟通;而瘘则定义为两个上皮化表面之间的异常沟通。传统上,手术治疗是漏和瘘的首选方法,但这种方法与高发病率相关,死亡率也较高。然而,随着新型设备和技术的发展,内镜治疗在这些病症的管理中发挥着越来越重要的作用。在临床稳定后尽早诊断并开始内镜治疗对于取得成功至关重要,因为与迟发性和慢性漏和瘘相比,急性漏和瘘的临床成功率更高。有多种内镜技术可供选择,其作用机制各不相同,包括直接封闭、覆盖/引流或分流。在考虑患者和缺陷特征的基础上,应进行个体化治疗。虽然缺乏高质量的研究来提供标准化的治疗方案,但本综述性文章旨在总结当前的科学证据,并根据这些数据和我们的丰富经验,提出建议,以帮助选择管理减重手术后漏和瘘的最佳内镜方法。