School of Education, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.
Human Development and Family Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.
J Intellect Disabil. 2024 Jun;28(2):434-452. doi: 10.1177/17446295231164662. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
Individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities face barriers to accessing sex education, including a lack of professional ownership over providing sex education. Limited information exists regarding educator training background, funding structure, and who they serve. We interviewed 58 sex educators of individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities. We integrated thematic analysis and composite narratives to identify service models and the benefits and challenges associated with them. We identified seven service delivery models: clinic-based board-certified behavior analysis; mental health therapists; small businesses; public health not-for-profits; disability programs; high school-based educators; and university-based educators; and three themes that addressed the strengths and challenges of these service models: Instructional Implications of the Short-term, Drop-in Approach; Getting on the Same Page; and Questioning Who Should Teach Sex Education. Understanding these typologies and their strengths and challenges provide insights into how we can build capacity for sex education services.
个体若存在智力和发育障碍,他们获取性教育的机会就会受阻,包括缺乏提供性教育的专业自主权。关于教育者的培训背景、资金结构以及服务对象,相关信息十分有限。我们采访了 58 名智力和发育障碍人士的性教育者。我们结合主题分析和综合叙述,确定了服务模式,以及这些模式相关的益处和挑战。我们确定了七种服务提供模式:以诊所为基础的持牌行为分析;心理健康治疗师;小型企业;公共卫生非营利组织;残疾项目;高中教育者;和大学教育者;以及三个主题,探讨了这些服务模式的优势和挑战:短期、即到即学方法的教学意义;达成共识;以及质疑谁应该教授性教育。了解这些类型及其优缺点,为我们如何为性教育服务提供能力建设提供了思路。