Role of hospitalists in Japan for heart failure in the elderly: single center retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

In Japan, the benefits of hospitalist physician-led care after heart failure have not been sufficiently demonstrated. We evaluated quality of care by the general internal medicine hospitalist (GIM-H) system for patients after acute heart failure and compared it with care by cardiologists.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study enrolled adult patients from within a two-year period who were admitted to our institution for heart failure. Primary outcome measures were medico-economic indicators: length of hospital stay and medical costs. Secondary outcomes included readmission within 30 days of discharge, death within 30 days of admission, rate of prescription of ACEI/ARB and beta-blockers for heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, and the percentage of patients receiving bespoke written treatment plans after discharge. This was thought to represent quality of heart failure-specific care. Outcomes between the groups were compared by adjusting for background factors using a propensity score.

RESULTS

We enrolled 404 patients, and 81 were assigned to each group after matching (mean age: 86 years, female: 64.2%, mean left ventricular ejection fraction: 53.2%). The GIM-H-treated group had a significantly shorter hospital stay (13.7 days vs. 21.8 days, < 0.001), a significantly lower total medical cost (618,805 JPY vs. 867,857 JPY, < 0.05) but a higher medical cost per day (48,010 JPY vs 42,813 JPY, < 0.05) than the cardiologist-treated group. Other indicators were not significantly different.

CONCLUSIONS

: GIM-H physicians in Japan are suggested to be useful and effective in care of patients with heart failure. The hospitalist system may positively impact the health economic outcomes of such patients.