• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

左主干交叉支架置入后罪犯回旋支基于 Murray 法的定量血流比的长期预后价值。

Long-term prognostic value of Murray law-based quantitative flow ratio in jailed left circumflex coronary artery after left main crossover stenting.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Institute of Coronary Heart Disease, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Xinquan, Road 29#, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 16;13(1):4391. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-30991-4.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-30991-4
PMID:36927741
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10020166/
Abstract

We aimed to evaluate the impact of new Murray law-based QFR of jailed left circumflex coronary artery (LCx) on long-term clinical outcomes after left main coronary artery (LM) simple crossover stenting. 164 patients who underwent LM-to-left anterior descending coronary artery simple crossover stenting and had appropriate angiographic view of LCx for QFR computation were enrolled. The primary clinical outcome was the 5-year target lesion failure (TLF), defined as a composite of cardiac death, a target vessel myocardial infarction or target lesion repeat revascularization. The mean QFR of the LCx after LM stent implantation was 0.88 ± 0.09, and 29 patients (17.7%) had a low QFR (< 0.80), which was significantly associated with a higher 5-year rate of TLF when compared with the high QFR group (27.6% vs. 6.7%; HR: 4.235; 95% CI 1.21-14.95; p = 0.0015). The 5-year LCx ostium-related TLR rate in the low QFR group was also higher (17.2% vs. 3.0% in the high QFR group; HR: 6.07, 95% CI 1.63-22.59, p = 0.002). In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, a low QFR in the LCx after LM stenting was an independent predictor of the 5-year TLF rate (HR: 3.21, 95% CI 1.21-8.53; p = 0.019). ROC analysis showed that QFR a negative predictive value (NPV) of 89.6% ([AUC] 0.73, 95% CI 0.58-0.88, p < 0.05), the cutoff point is 0.85. The patients with a low QFR (< 0.80) in jailed LCX after LM simple crossover stenting had worse 5-year outcomes than those with a high QFR. Conversely, a QFR ≥ 0.85 of jailed LCx could serve as a good predictor of low risk of adverse outcome in LCx ostium. The QFR computation of the jailed LCx may be helpful to determine whether an additional procedure is required for the jailed side branch.

摘要

我们旨在评估新的基于 Murray 法则的 QFR 对左主干冠状动脉(LM)单纯交叉支架置入后左回旋支(LCx)长期临床结局的影响。共纳入 164 例接受 LM 至左前降支(LAD)单纯交叉支架置入术且 LCx 有合适的 QFR 计算血管造影视图的患者。主要临床终点为 5 年靶病变失败(TLF),定义为心脏死亡、靶血管心肌梗死或靶病变再次血运重建的复合终点。LM 支架置入后 LCx 的平均 QFR 为 0.88 ± 0.09,29 例(17.7%)QFR 较低(<0.80),与 QFR 较高组相比,5 年 TLF 发生率更高(27.6%比 6.7%;HR:4.235;95%CI 1.21-14.95;p=0.0015)。低 QFR 组 5 年 LCx 开口相关 TLR 发生率也较高(17.2%比 QFR 较高组 3.0%;HR:6.07,95%CI 1.63-22.59,p=0.002)。多变量 Cox 回归分析显示,LM 支架置入后 LCx 的低 QFR 是 5 年 TLF 发生率的独立预测因素(HR:3.21,95%CI 1.21-8.53;p=0.019)。ROC 分析显示,QFR 的阴性预测值(NPV)为 89.6%[AUC 0.73,95%CI 0.58-0.88,p<0.05],截断点为 0.85。LM 单纯交叉支架置入后 LCx 中 QFR 较低(<0.80)的患者 5 年结局较 QFR 较高的患者差。相反,LCx 中 QFR≥0.85可作为 LCx 开口不良结局低风险的良好预测因子。LCx 受困分支 QFR 的计算可能有助于确定是否需要对受困分支进行额外的介入治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75c6/10020166/c290cc473064/41598_2023_30991_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75c6/10020166/db35acdea7a5/41598_2023_30991_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75c6/10020166/dfecc36d94dd/41598_2023_30991_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75c6/10020166/9d31d37fa22e/41598_2023_30991_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75c6/10020166/ff6decc0f8b3/41598_2023_30991_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75c6/10020166/c290cc473064/41598_2023_30991_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75c6/10020166/db35acdea7a5/41598_2023_30991_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75c6/10020166/dfecc36d94dd/41598_2023_30991_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75c6/10020166/9d31d37fa22e/41598_2023_30991_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75c6/10020166/ff6decc0f8b3/41598_2023_30991_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75c6/10020166/c290cc473064/41598_2023_30991_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Long-term prognostic value of Murray law-based quantitative flow ratio in jailed left circumflex coronary artery after left main crossover stenting.左主干交叉支架置入后罪犯回旋支基于 Murray 法的定量血流比的长期预后价值。
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 16;13(1):4391. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-30991-4.
2
5-Year Outcomes According to FFR of Left Circumflex Coronary Artery After Left Main Crossover Stenting.左主干分叉病变后左回旋支经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后血流储备分数的 5 年结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 May 13;12(9):847-855. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.02.037.
3
Single-stent crossover technique from distal unprotected left main coronary artery to the left circumflex artery.经远端无保护左主干至回旋支的单支架交叉技术。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Nov 1;82(5):757-64. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24988. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
4
Predictors and 3-year outcomes of compromised left circumflex coronary artery after left main crossover stenting.左主干交叉支架置入术后左回旋支临界病变的预测因素及其 3 年转归。
Clin Cardiol. 2021 Oct;44(10):1377-1385. doi: 10.1002/clc.23693. Epub 2021 Jul 16.
5
Long-term outcomes of simple crossover stenting from the left main to the left anterior descending coronary artery.从左主干到左前降支冠状动脉进行简单交叉支架置入术的长期预后。
Korean J Intern Med. 2014 Sep;29(5):597-602. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2014.29.5.597. Epub 2014 Aug 28.
6
Optimal Minimal Stent Area and Impact of Stent Underexpansion in Left Main Up-Front 2-Stent Strategy.左主干 upfront 2 支架策略中最优最小支架面积和支架扩张不足的影响。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Jan;17(1):e013006. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.013006. Epub 2024 Jan 16.
7
Clinical Implications of Bifurcation Angles in Left Main Bifurcation Intervention Using a Two-Stent Technique.左主干分叉病变双支架技术中分叉角度的临床意义。
J Interv Cardiol. 2020 Jul 11;2020:2475930. doi: 10.1155/2020/2475930. eCollection 2020.
8
Dynamic assessment of the left main-left circumflex bending angle: Implications for ostial left circumflex artery in-stent restenosis after successful two-stent PCI.左主干-左旋支弯曲角度的动态评估:对成功进行双支架PCI术后左旋支开口处支架内再狭窄的意义
Int J Cardiol. 2023 May 1;378:11-19. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2023.02.030. Epub 2023 Feb 15.
9
Clinical Outcomes After Current-Generation Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation for Ostial Left Circumflex Lesions.经新一代药物洗脱支架植入治疗开口左回旋支病变的临床结局。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2022 Jul;40:57-61. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2021.11.009. Epub 2021 Nov 7.
10
Impact of coronary anatomy and stenting technique on long-term outcome after drug-eluting stent implantation for unprotected left main coronary artery disease.药物洗脱支架置入治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉疾病后,冠状动脉解剖结构和支架技术对长期预后的影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jan;7(1):29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.08.013. Epub 2013 Dec 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Association Between Stent Implantation and Progression of Nontarget Lesions in a Rabbit Model of Atherosclerosis.支架置入与动脉粥样硬化兔模型中非靶病变进展的相关性。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Nov;14(11):e010764. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.121.010764. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
2
Left main coronary disease at the bifurcation: should the pendulum swing back towards the provisional stenting approach?
Eur Heart J. 2021 Oct 1;42(37):3840-3843. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab363.
3
The European bifurcation club Left Main Coronary Stent study: a randomized comparison of stepwise provisional vs. systematic dual stenting strategies (EBC MAIN).欧洲分叉俱乐部左主干冠状动脉支架研究:分步临时与系统双支架策略的随机比较(EBC MAIN)。
Eur Heart J. 2021 Oct 1;42(37):3829-3839. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab283.
4
Diagnostic accuracy of quantitative flow ratio for assessment of coronary stenosis significance from a single angiographic view: A novel method based on bifurcation fractal law.定量血流比评估单支血管造影下冠状动脉狭窄意义的诊断准确性:一种基于分叉分形律的新方法。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 May 1;97 Suppl 2:1040-1047. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29592. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
5
Percutaneous coronary intervention for bifurcation coronary lesions: the 15 consensus document from the European Bifurcation Club.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗分叉病变:来自欧洲分叉俱乐部的 15 项共识文件。
EuroIntervention. 2021 Mar 19;16(16):1307-1317. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-20-00169.
6
Quantitative flow ratio-guided strategy versus angiography-guided strategy for percutaneous coronary intervention: Rationale and design of the FAVOR III China trial.定量血流分数比值指导策略与血管造影指导策略在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的应用:FAVOR III China 试验的原理和设计。
Am Heart J. 2020 May;223:72-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.02.015. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
7
Influence of final kissing balloon inflation on long-term outcomes after PCI of distal left main bifurcation lesions in the EXCEL trial.EXCEL 试验中,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)左主干分叉病变远段后,最终球囊扩张对长期预后的影响。
EuroIntervention. 2020 Jun 25;16(3):218-224. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00851.
8
Left Circumflex Coronary Artery After Left Main Crossover Stenting: Jailed Yet Mostly Innocent.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 May 13;12(9):856-858. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.03.015.
9
5-Year Outcomes According to FFR of Left Circumflex Coronary Artery After Left Main Crossover Stenting.左主干分叉病变后左回旋支经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后血流储备分数的 5 年结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 May 13;12(9):847-855. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.02.037.
10
Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (2018).心肌梗死的第四次全球定义(2018年)。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Oct 30;72(18):2231-2264. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.08.1038. Epub 2018 Aug 25.