Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
La Trobe Sport and Exercise Medicine Research Centre, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Br J Sports Med. 2023 Oct;57(20):1311-1316. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2022-105547. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
To develop and evaluate a modified version of the Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-Achilles (VISA-A) questionnaire, for use in sedentary patients with Achilles tendinopathy, using the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments recommendations.
Twenty-two sedentary patients with Achilles tendinopathy completed the VISA-A and provided feedback regarding the relevance, comprehensiveness and comprehensibility of each item, response options and instructions. Patient and professional feedback was used to develop the VISA-A (sedentary) questionnaire. Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the VISA-A (sedentary) was evaluated in 51 sedentary patients with Achilles tendinopathy: 47.1% women, mean age 64.8 (SD 11.24).
Factor analysis identified two dimensions (symptoms and activity) for the VISA-A (sedentary). Test-retest reliability was excellent for symptoms (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC=0.991) and activity (ICC=0.999). Repeatability was 1.647 for symptoms and 0.549 for activity. There was a significant difference between the VISA-A and VISA-A (sedentary) scores both pretreatment and post-treatment. There was stronger correlation between the pretreatment to post-treatment change in the VISA-A (sedentary) scores (r=0.420 for symptoms, r=0.407 for activity) and the global rating of change than the VISA-A scores (r=0.253 for symptoms, r=0.186 for activity).
The VISA-A (sedentary) demonstrates adequate reliability, validity and responsiveness in sedentary patients with Achilles tendinopathy. The VISA-A (sedentary) is a more appropriate measure than the VISA-A for this cohort and is recommended for clinical and research purposes.
根据共识标准选择健康测量仪器建议,开发并评估维多利亚运动研究所评估-跟腱(VISA-A)问卷的改良版本,用于久坐的跟腱病患者。
22 名久坐的跟腱病患者完成了 VISA-A,并就每个项目、答案选项和说明的相关性、全面性和可理解性提供了反馈。患者和专业人员的反馈用于开发 VISA-A(久坐)问卷。在 51 名久坐的跟腱病患者中评估了 VISA-A(久坐)的可靠性、有效性和反应性:女性占 47.1%,平均年龄 64.8(SD 11.24)。
因子分析确定了 VISA-A(久坐)的两个维度(症状和活动)。症状的组内相关系数(ICC=0.991)和活动的 ICC(ICC=0.999)测试-重测可靠性非常好。症状的重复性为 1.647,活动的重复性为 0.549。VISA-A 和 VISA-A(久坐)评分在治疗前后均有显著差异。VISA-A(久坐)评分的治疗前后变化与整体变化的相关性更强(症状为 r=0.420,活动为 r=0.407),而与 VISA-A 评分的相关性较弱(症状为 r=0.253,活动为 r=0.186)。
VISA-A(久坐)在久坐的跟腱病患者中具有足够的可靠性、有效性和反应性。VISA-A(久坐)比 VISA-A 更适合该队列,推荐用于临床和研究目的。