Suppr超能文献

腱病严重程度评估-跟腱(TENDINS-A):根据 COSMIN 建议进行可靠性和有效性评估。

TENDINopathy Severity assessment-Achilles (TENDINS-A): evaluation of reliability and validity in accordance with COSMIN recommendations.

机构信息

Nutrition and Health Innovation Research Institute, School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia

School of Health Sciences, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, Western Australia, Australia.

出版信息

Br J Sports Med. 2024 May 31;58(12):665-673. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2023-107741.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the construct validity (structural validity and hypothesis testing), reliability (test-retest reliability, measurement error and internal consistency) and minimal important change (MIC) of the 13-item TENDINopathy Severity assessment-Achilles (TENDINS-A).

METHODS

Participants with Achilles pain completed an online survey including: demographics, TENDINS-A, Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) and Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-Achilles (VISA-A). Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) assessed dimensionality. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) assessed structural validity (root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA); Comparative Fit Index (CFI); Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI); standardised root measure square (SRMS)). Correlations between TENDINS-A and the FAOS or VISA-A assessed hypothesis testing. Intraclass correlation (ICC) assessed test-retest reliability. Cronbach's alpha assessed internal consistency. SE of the measurement (SEM) assessed measurement error. A distribution-based approach assessed MIC.

RESULTS

79 participants (51% female) with a mean (SD) age=42.6 (13.0) years, height=175.0 (11.7) cm and body mass=82.0 (19.1) kg were included. EFA identified three meaningful factors, proposed as pain, symptoms and function. The best model identified using CFA for TENDINS-A had structural validity (RMSEA=0.101, CFI=0.959, TLI=0.947, SRMS=0.068), which included three factors (pain, symptoms and function), but excluded three items from the original TENDINS-A. TENDINS-A exhibited moderate positive correlation with FAOS (r=0.598, p<0.001) and a moderate negative correlation with VISA-A (r=-0.639, p<0.001). Reliability of the TENDINS-A was excellent (ICC=0.930; Cronbach's α=0.808; SEM=6.54 units), with an MIC of 12 units.

CONCLUSIONS

Our evaluation of the revised 10-item TENDINS-A determined it has construct validity and excellent reliability, compared with the VISA-A and FAOS which lack content and construct validity. The TENDINS-A is recommended as the preferred patient-reported outcome measure to assess disability in people with Achilles tendinopathy.

摘要

目的

评估 13 项跟腱病严重程度评估-Achilles(TENDINS-A)的结构效度(结构效度和假设检验)、信度(重测信度、测量误差和内部一致性)和最小重要变化(MIC)。

方法

有跟腱疼痛的参与者完成了一项在线调查,包括:人口统计学资料、TENDINS-A、足踝结果评分(FAOS)和维多利亚运动评估-Achilles(VISA-A)。探索性因子分析(EFA)评估维度。验证性因子分析(CFA)评估结构效度(近似均方根误差(RMSEA);拟合指数(CFI);塔克-刘易斯指数(TLI);标准化根测平方(SRMS))。TENDINS-A 与 FAOS 或 VISA-A 之间的相关性评估假设检验。组内相关系数(ICC)评估重测信度。克朗巴赫的 alpha 评估内部一致性。测量的标准误差(SEM)评估测量误差。基于分布的方法评估 MIC。

结果

纳入 79 名参与者(51%为女性),平均(SD)年龄=42.6(13.0)岁,身高=175.0(11.7)cm,体重=82.0(19.1)kg。EFA 确定了三个有意义的因素,分别为疼痛、症状和功能。使用 CFA 对 TENDINS-A 进行最佳模型识别,具有结构效度(RMSEA=0.101,CFI=0.959,TLI=0.947,SRMS=0.068),包括三个因素(疼痛、症状和功能),但排除了 TENDINS-A 的三个项目。TENDINS-A 与 FAOS 呈中度正相关(r=0.598,p<0.001),与 VISA-A 呈中度负相关(r=-0.639,p<0.001)。TENDINS-A 的可靠性为优(ICC=0.930;克朗巴赫的α=0.808;SEM=6.54 单位),MIC 为 12 单位。

结论

与缺乏内容和结构效度的 VISA-A 和 FAOS 相比,我们对修订后的 10 项 TENDINS-A 的评估确定其具有结构效度和良好的可靠性。建议 TENDINS-A 作为评估跟腱病患者残疾的首选患者报告结局测量工具。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验