• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三种不同面部扫描模式准确性的体外比较。

An in vitro Comparison of Accuracy Between Three Different Face Scanning Modalities.

机构信息

Private Dental Practice, Heraklion, Crete, Greece.

Private Dental Practice, Chania, Crete, Greece.

出版信息

Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2023 Aug 31;31(3):296-307. doi: 10.1922/EJPRD_2495Michelinakis12.

DOI:10.1922/EJPRD_2495Michelinakis12
PMID:36927828
Abstract

A mannequin head was digitized using a reference scanner (Scan in a Box) to acquire the reference mesh. Subsequently it was scanned with a structured light scanner (Einscan Pro HD), a stereophotogrammetry scanner (RayFace100) and a laser scanner (Proface 3D Mid) to acquire test meshes.Resulting meshes were delineated in four horizontal areas and discrepancies calculated for the complete face and different facial partitions. One-way Anova and pairwise comparisons tests were used to compare trueness and precision between scanners across different areas. Significant differences were detected among scanners for complete face (F (3, 27) =776, P ⟨ 0.01)) and for delineated face areas (F (11, 99) =200.1, P ⟨ 0.01)). Einscan had significantly higher accuracy for the complete face (P⟨0.01) and significantly higher trueness for each facial partition compared to other scanners. RayFace had significantly higher trueness when scanning the middle part of face compared to other facial parts. Proface had significantly lower upper facial third trueness compared to other facial parts. All scanners had accuracy levels below the 2.00mm threshold. Facial scanning accuracy was influenced per scanner used. Scanning trueness per device was influenced by location of surface area. All scanners had accuracy levels within the acceptable accuracy threshold.

摘要

使用参考扫描仪(Scan in a Box)对人头模型进行数字化处理,以获取参考网格。随后,使用结构光扫描仪(Einscan Pro HD)、立体摄影测量扫描仪(RayFace100)和激光扫描仪(Proface 3D Mid)对其进行扫描,以获取测试网格。将所得网格在四个水平区域中进行描绘,并计算整个面部和不同面部分区的差异。使用单向方差分析和两两比较检验来比较不同区域不同扫描仪之间的真实性和精度。在整个面部(F (3, 27) = 776,P ⟨ 0.01)和不同面部分区(F (11, 99) = 200.1,P ⟨ 0.01)方面,不同扫描仪之间存在显著差异。与其他扫描仪相比,Einscan 在整个面部(P ⟨ 0.01)和每个面部分区的准确性方面具有更高的精度,在整个面部(P ⟨ 0.01)和每个面部分区的真实性方面具有更高的准确性。与其他面部部分相比,RayFace 在扫描面部中间部分时具有更高的真实性。与其他面部部分相比,Proface 在上部面部三分之一的真实性方面较低。所有扫描仪的精度水平均低于 2.00mm 阈值。面部扫描精度受所用扫描仪的影响。每个设备的扫描精度受表面区域位置的影响。所有扫描仪的精度水平均在可接受的精度阈值内。

相似文献

1
An in vitro Comparison of Accuracy Between Three Different Face Scanning Modalities.三种不同面部扫描模式准确性的体外比较。
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2023 Aug 31;31(3):296-307. doi: 10.1922/EJPRD_2495Michelinakis12.
2
Facial scanning accuracy depending on the alignment algorithm and digitized surface area location: An in vitro study.面部扫描精度取决于配准算法和数字化表面区域位置:一项体外研究。
J Dent. 2021 Jul;110:103680. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103680. Epub 2021 Apr 24.
3
Accuracy of RGB-D camera-based and stereophotogrammetric facial scanners: a comparative study.基于 RGB-D 相机和立体摄影测量面部扫描仪的准确性:一项比较研究。
J Dent. 2022 Dec;127:104302. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104302. Epub 2022 Sep 21.
4
[Trueness of 4 three-dimensional facial scanners: an study].[4种三维面部扫描仪的准确性:一项研究]
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2022 Oct 9;57(10):1036-1042. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112144-20220715-00385.
5
Influence of operator experience, scanner type, and scan size on 3D scans.操作人员经验、扫描仪类型和扫描范围对 3D 扫描的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2021 Feb;125(2):294-299. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.12.011. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
6
A comparative study assessing the precision and trueness of digital and printed casts produced from several intraoral and extraoral scanners in full arch and short span (3-unit FPD) scanning: An in vitro study.一项评估几种口内和口外扫描仪在全牙弓和短跨度(3 单位 FPD)扫描中产生的数字和印刷模型的精度和准确性的对比研究:一项体外研究。
J Prosthodont. 2023 Jun;32(5):423-430. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13568. Epub 2022 Aug 3.
7
Understanding the effect of scan spans on the accuracy of intraoral and desktop scanners.理解扫描跨度对口腔内和台式扫描仪准确性的影响。
J Dent. 2022 Sep;124:104220. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104220. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
8
A comparison of accuracy of 3 intraoral scanners: A single-blinded in vitro study.三种口内扫描仪准确性的比较:一项单盲体外研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Nov;124(5):581-588. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.10.023. Epub 2019 Dec 24.
9
Effect of Ambient Lights on the Accuracy of a 3-Dimensional Optical Scanner for Face Scans: An In Vitro Study.环境光对面部扫描三维光学扫描仪准确性的影响:一项体外研究。
J Healthc Eng. 2022 Aug 5;2022:2637078. doi: 10.1155/2022/2637078. eCollection 2022.
10
Scanning accuracy of nondental structured light extraoral scanners compared with that of a dental-specific scanner.非牙科结构光口外扫描仪与专用牙科扫描仪的扫描精度比较。
J Prosthet Dent. 2021 Jul;126(1):110-114. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.04.009. Epub 2020 Jul 19.

引用本文的文献

1
The accuracy of three-dimensional facial scan obtained from three different 3d scanners.从三种不同的三维扫描仪获取的三维面部扫描的准确性。
PLoS One. 2025 May 23;20(5):e0322358. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322358. eCollection 2025.
2
The chance and challenge of creating virtual patients in prosthodontics.在口腔修复学中创建虚拟患者的机遇与挑战。
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2024 Feb 1;42(1):1-11. doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2024.2023317.