Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Center for Value-Based Care Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Aug;71(8):2406-2418. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18322. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
Evidence on the effects of neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage on dementia risk in racially and ethically diverse populations is limited. Our objective was to evaluate the relative extent to which neighborhood disadvantage accounts for racial/ethnic variation in dementia incidence rates. Secondarily, we evaluated the spatial relationship between neighborhood disadvantage and dementia risk.
In this retrospective study using electronic health records (EHR) at two regional health systems in Northeast Ohio, participants included 253,421 patients aged >60 years who had an outpatient primary care visit between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2015. The date of the first qualifying visit served as the study baseline. Cumulative incidence of composite dementia outcome, defined as EHR-documented dementia diagnosis or dementia-related death, stratified by neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation (as measured by Area Deprivation Index) was determined by competing-risk regression analysis, with non-dementia-related death as the competing risk. Fine-Gray sub-distribution hazard ratios were determined for neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation, race/ethnicity, and clinical risk factors. The degree to which neighborhood socioeconomic position accounted for racial/ethnic disparities in the incidence of composite dementia outcome was evaluated via mediation analysis with Poisson rate models.
Increasing neighborhood disadvantage was associated with increased risk of EHR-documented dementia diagnosis or dementia-related death (most vs. least disadvantaged ADI quintile HR = 1.76, 95% confidence interval = 1.69-1.84) after adjusting for age and sex. The effect of neighborhood disadvantage on this composite dementia outcome remained after accounting for known medical risk factors of dementia. Mediation analysis indicated that neighborhood disadvantage accounted for 34% and 29% of the elevated risk for composite dementia outcome in Hispanic and Black patients compared to White patients, respectively.
Neighborhood disadvantage is related to the risk of EHR-documented dementia diagnosis or dementia-related death and accounts for a portion of racial/ethnic differences in dementia burden, even after adjustment for clinically important confounders.
关于邻里社会经济劣势对不同种族和族裔人群痴呆风险影响的证据有限。我们的目的是评估邻里劣势在多大程度上解释了痴呆发病率的种族/族裔差异。其次,我们评估了邻里劣势与痴呆风险之间的空间关系。
在俄亥俄州东北部两个区域卫生系统的电子健康记录(EHR)中进行了这项回顾性研究,参与者包括 253421 名年龄>60 岁的患者,他们在 2005 年 1 月 1 日至 2015 年 12 月 31 日期间有一次门诊初级保健就诊。首次符合条件的就诊日期作为研究基线。通过竞争风险回归分析确定按邻里社会经济剥夺程度(以区域剥夺指数衡量)分层的复合痴呆结局的累积发生率,非痴呆相关死亡为竞争风险。Fine-Gray 亚分布风险比确定了邻里社会经济剥夺、种族/族裔和临床危险因素。通过泊松率模型的中介分析评估邻里社会经济地位在复合痴呆结局发生率的种族/族裔差异中所占的程度。
在调整年龄和性别后,与最不利的 ADI 五分位相比,邻里劣势程度增加与 EHR 记录的痴呆诊断或痴呆相关死亡风险增加相关(最高五分位与最低五分位 ADI 的 HR=1.76,95%置信区间 1.69-1.84)。在考虑到痴呆的已知医学危险因素后,邻里劣势对这一复合痴呆结局的影响仍然存在。中介分析表明,与白人患者相比,邻里劣势分别导致西班牙裔和黑人患者的复合痴呆结局风险增加 34%和 29%。
邻里劣势与 EHR 记录的痴呆诊断或痴呆相关死亡风险相关,并解释了痴呆负担在种族/族裔差异的一部分,即使在调整了临床重要的混杂因素后也是如此。