Suppr超能文献

免疫电子显微镜法检测弹性蛋白。不同方法的比较。

Detection of elastin by immunoelectronmicroscopy. A comparison of different procedures.

作者信息

Daga-Gordini D, Bressan G M, Castellani I, Volpin D

机构信息

Institute of Histology and Embryology, University of Padova, Italy.

出版信息

Histochemistry. 1987;87(6):573-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00492473.

Abstract

Elastin components have been identified in chick aorta by different immunoelectronmicroscopic procedures (peroxidase-antiperoxidase, immunoferritin and immunogold) using affinity purified antibodies to chick tropoelastin. The PAP method used in a preembedding procedure stained the outer portion of amorphous elastin and the microfibrils very intensively. The surface of the cells was also slightly stained. On the contrary immunogold labelling on Epon or Lowicryl embedded sections produced a strong decoration only of amorphous elastin, while microfibrils remained almost completely unlabelled. The result is not due to loss of antigenicity of microfibrils during embedding, since similar data were obtained with immunoferritin in a preembedding procedure. Experiments performed under different stringency conditions showed that the products of the peroxidase reaction diffuse and redistribute in the tissue, indicating that the positive staining of microfibrils and cell surface is an artifact. The value of different immunological reagents and procedures in studying the fine mapping of elastin components is discussed.

摘要

利用针对鸡原弹性蛋白的亲和纯化抗体,通过不同的免疫电子显微镜技术(过氧化物酶-抗过氧化物酶法、免疫铁蛋白法和免疫金法)在鸡主动脉中鉴定出了弹性蛋白成分。预包埋程序中使用的过氧化物酶-抗过氧化物酶法对无定形弹性蛋白的外部和微原纤维进行了非常强烈的染色。细胞表面也有轻微染色。相反,在环氧树脂或低温包埋切片上进行的免疫金标记仅对无定形弹性蛋白产生强烈的标记,而微原纤维几乎完全未被标记。该结果并非由于包埋过程中微原纤维抗原性的丧失,因为在预包埋程序中用免疫铁蛋白也获得了类似的数据。在不同严格条件下进行的实验表明,过氧化物酶反应产物在组织中扩散和重新分布,这表明微原纤维和细胞表面的阳性染色是一种假象。本文讨论了不同免疫试剂和程序在研究弹性蛋白成分精细定位中的价值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验